Cargando…
Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence
The accurate diagnosis of individual tooth prognosis has to be determined comprehensively in consideration of the broader treatment plan. The objective of this study was to establish an effective artificial intelligence (AI)-based module for an accurate tooth prognosis decision based on the Harvard...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061422 |
_version_ | 1784732669416833024 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Sang J. Chung, Dahee Asano, Akiko Sasaki, Daisuke Maeno, Masahiko Ishida, Yoshiki Kobayashi, Takuya Kuwajima, Yukinori Da Silva, John D. Nagai, Shigemi |
author_facet | Lee, Sang J. Chung, Dahee Asano, Akiko Sasaki, Daisuke Maeno, Masahiko Ishida, Yoshiki Kobayashi, Takuya Kuwajima, Yukinori Da Silva, John D. Nagai, Shigemi |
author_sort | Lee, Sang J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The accurate diagnosis of individual tooth prognosis has to be determined comprehensively in consideration of the broader treatment plan. The objective of this study was to establish an effective artificial intelligence (AI)-based module for an accurate tooth prognosis decision based on the Harvard School of Dental Medicine (HSDM) comprehensive treatment planning curriculum (CTPC). The tooth prognosis of 2359 teeth from 94 cases was evaluated with 1 to 5 levels (1—Hopeless, 5—Good condition for long term) by two groups (Model-A with 16, and Model-B with 13 examiners) based on 17 clinical determining factors selected from the HSDM-CTPC. Three AI machine-learning methods including gradient boosting classifier, decision tree classifier, and random forest classifier were used to create an algorithm. These three methods were evaluated against the gold standard data determined by consensus of three experienced prosthodontists, and their accuracy was analyzed. The decision tree classifier indicated the highest accuracy at 0.8413 (Model-A) and 0.7523 (Model-B). Accuracy with the gradient boosting classifier and the random forest classifier was 0.6896, 0.6687, and 0.8413, 0.7523, respectively. Overall, the decision tree classifier had the best accuracy among the three methods. The study contributes to the implementation of AI in the decision-making process of tooth prognosis in consideration of the treatment plan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9221626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92216262022-06-24 Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence Lee, Sang J. Chung, Dahee Asano, Akiko Sasaki, Daisuke Maeno, Masahiko Ishida, Yoshiki Kobayashi, Takuya Kuwajima, Yukinori Da Silva, John D. Nagai, Shigemi Diagnostics (Basel) Article The accurate diagnosis of individual tooth prognosis has to be determined comprehensively in consideration of the broader treatment plan. The objective of this study was to establish an effective artificial intelligence (AI)-based module for an accurate tooth prognosis decision based on the Harvard School of Dental Medicine (HSDM) comprehensive treatment planning curriculum (CTPC). The tooth prognosis of 2359 teeth from 94 cases was evaluated with 1 to 5 levels (1—Hopeless, 5—Good condition for long term) by two groups (Model-A with 16, and Model-B with 13 examiners) based on 17 clinical determining factors selected from the HSDM-CTPC. Three AI machine-learning methods including gradient boosting classifier, decision tree classifier, and random forest classifier were used to create an algorithm. These three methods were evaluated against the gold standard data determined by consensus of three experienced prosthodontists, and their accuracy was analyzed. The decision tree classifier indicated the highest accuracy at 0.8413 (Model-A) and 0.7523 (Model-B). Accuracy with the gradient boosting classifier and the random forest classifier was 0.6896, 0.6687, and 0.8413, 0.7523, respectively. Overall, the decision tree classifier had the best accuracy among the three methods. The study contributes to the implementation of AI in the decision-making process of tooth prognosis in consideration of the treatment plan. MDPI 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9221626/ /pubmed/35741232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061422 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Sang J. Chung, Dahee Asano, Akiko Sasaki, Daisuke Maeno, Masahiko Ishida, Yoshiki Kobayashi, Takuya Kuwajima, Yukinori Da Silva, John D. Nagai, Shigemi Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence |
title | Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence |
title_full | Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence |
title_fullStr | Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence |
title_short | Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence |
title_sort | diagnosis of tooth prognosis using artificial intelligence |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061422 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesangj diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence AT chungdahee diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence AT asanoakiko diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence AT sasakidaisuke diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence AT maenomasahiko diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence AT ishidayoshiki diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence AT kobayashitakuya diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence AT kuwajimayukinori diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence AT dasilvajohnd diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence AT nagaishigemi diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence |