Cargando…

Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence

The accurate diagnosis of individual tooth prognosis has to be determined comprehensively in consideration of the broader treatment plan. The objective of this study was to establish an effective artificial intelligence (AI)-based module for an accurate tooth prognosis decision based on the Harvard...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sang J., Chung, Dahee, Asano, Akiko, Sasaki, Daisuke, Maeno, Masahiko, Ishida, Yoshiki, Kobayashi, Takuya, Kuwajima, Yukinori, Da Silva, John D., Nagai, Shigemi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061422
_version_ 1784732669416833024
author Lee, Sang J.
Chung, Dahee
Asano, Akiko
Sasaki, Daisuke
Maeno, Masahiko
Ishida, Yoshiki
Kobayashi, Takuya
Kuwajima, Yukinori
Da Silva, John D.
Nagai, Shigemi
author_facet Lee, Sang J.
Chung, Dahee
Asano, Akiko
Sasaki, Daisuke
Maeno, Masahiko
Ishida, Yoshiki
Kobayashi, Takuya
Kuwajima, Yukinori
Da Silva, John D.
Nagai, Shigemi
author_sort Lee, Sang J.
collection PubMed
description The accurate diagnosis of individual tooth prognosis has to be determined comprehensively in consideration of the broader treatment plan. The objective of this study was to establish an effective artificial intelligence (AI)-based module for an accurate tooth prognosis decision based on the Harvard School of Dental Medicine (HSDM) comprehensive treatment planning curriculum (CTPC). The tooth prognosis of 2359 teeth from 94 cases was evaluated with 1 to 5 levels (1—Hopeless, 5—Good condition for long term) by two groups (Model-A with 16, and Model-B with 13 examiners) based on 17 clinical determining factors selected from the HSDM-CTPC. Three AI machine-learning methods including gradient boosting classifier, decision tree classifier, and random forest classifier were used to create an algorithm. These three methods were evaluated against the gold standard data determined by consensus of three experienced prosthodontists, and their accuracy was analyzed. The decision tree classifier indicated the highest accuracy at 0.8413 (Model-A) and 0.7523 (Model-B). Accuracy with the gradient boosting classifier and the random forest classifier was 0.6896, 0.6687, and 0.8413, 0.7523, respectively. Overall, the decision tree classifier had the best accuracy among the three methods. The study contributes to the implementation of AI in the decision-making process of tooth prognosis in consideration of the treatment plan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9221626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92216262022-06-24 Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence Lee, Sang J. Chung, Dahee Asano, Akiko Sasaki, Daisuke Maeno, Masahiko Ishida, Yoshiki Kobayashi, Takuya Kuwajima, Yukinori Da Silva, John D. Nagai, Shigemi Diagnostics (Basel) Article The accurate diagnosis of individual tooth prognosis has to be determined comprehensively in consideration of the broader treatment plan. The objective of this study was to establish an effective artificial intelligence (AI)-based module for an accurate tooth prognosis decision based on the Harvard School of Dental Medicine (HSDM) comprehensive treatment planning curriculum (CTPC). The tooth prognosis of 2359 teeth from 94 cases was evaluated with 1 to 5 levels (1—Hopeless, 5—Good condition for long term) by two groups (Model-A with 16, and Model-B with 13 examiners) based on 17 clinical determining factors selected from the HSDM-CTPC. Three AI machine-learning methods including gradient boosting classifier, decision tree classifier, and random forest classifier were used to create an algorithm. These three methods were evaluated against the gold standard data determined by consensus of three experienced prosthodontists, and their accuracy was analyzed. The decision tree classifier indicated the highest accuracy at 0.8413 (Model-A) and 0.7523 (Model-B). Accuracy with the gradient boosting classifier and the random forest classifier was 0.6896, 0.6687, and 0.8413, 0.7523, respectively. Overall, the decision tree classifier had the best accuracy among the three methods. The study contributes to the implementation of AI in the decision-making process of tooth prognosis in consideration of the treatment plan. MDPI 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9221626/ /pubmed/35741232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061422 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Sang J.
Chung, Dahee
Asano, Akiko
Sasaki, Daisuke
Maeno, Masahiko
Ishida, Yoshiki
Kobayashi, Takuya
Kuwajima, Yukinori
Da Silva, John D.
Nagai, Shigemi
Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence
title Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence
title_full Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence
title_fullStr Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence
title_short Diagnosis of Tooth Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence
title_sort diagnosis of tooth prognosis using artificial intelligence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061422
work_keys_str_mv AT leesangj diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence
AT chungdahee diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence
AT asanoakiko diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence
AT sasakidaisuke diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence
AT maenomasahiko diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence
AT ishidayoshiki diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence
AT kobayashitakuya diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence
AT kuwajimayukinori diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence
AT dasilvajohnd diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence
AT nagaishigemi diagnosisoftoothprognosisusingartificialintelligence