Cargando…
Primary Teeth Supported Fixed Prosthesis—A Predictable Treatment Alternative
Background: Individuals with tooth agenesis often present a significant clinical challenge for dental practitioners. This retrospective study evaluated clinical and radiological long-term functional and esthetic outcomes following restoration using primary teeth to support fixed all-ceramic prosthes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35740741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9060804 |
_version_ | 1784732686730919936 |
---|---|
author | Naishlos, Sarit Chaushu, Liat Ghelfan, Oded Nissan, Joseph Peretz, Benjamin Ratson, Tal Ben-Izhack, Gil Davidovich, Moshe Blumer, Sigalit |
author_facet | Naishlos, Sarit Chaushu, Liat Ghelfan, Oded Nissan, Joseph Peretz, Benjamin Ratson, Tal Ben-Izhack, Gil Davidovich, Moshe Blumer, Sigalit |
author_sort | Naishlos, Sarit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Individuals with tooth agenesis often present a significant clinical challenge for dental practitioners. This retrospective study evaluated clinical and radiological long-term functional and esthetic outcomes following restoration using primary teeth to support fixed all-ceramic prosthesis in patients with teeth agenesis. Methods: Patients with teeth agenesis and at least one year follow-up were included. Examinations included panoramic X-ray, clinical examination and family history records. Only primary teeth without permanent teeth underneath were chosen. All ceramic fixed restorations were used. All data were collected from patient files. Outcome parameters included: restoration parameters (restoration survival, restoration fractures, restoration detachment, restoration replacement, and secondary caries), plaque index, and gingival index. Results: The study included 58 porcelain restorations inserted in 25 individuals; mean age 12 ± 2.1 years (range 10–19 years); mean number of missing teeth 12.3 ± 9 (range 6–12). Mean follow-up 48 ± 6 months (range 12–60 months). All restorations survived up to last follow-up, rendering a survival rate of 100%. Restorations outcome—porcelain chipping (9%), detachment (2%), no restoration replacement nor secondary caries, mean gingival index—0.7 ± 0.5 and mean plaque index—0.9 ± 0.3. Conclusions: In tooth agenesis, restoration using primary teeth to support fixed all-ceramic prosthesis is a viable treatment alternative. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9221699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92216992022-06-24 Primary Teeth Supported Fixed Prosthesis—A Predictable Treatment Alternative Naishlos, Sarit Chaushu, Liat Ghelfan, Oded Nissan, Joseph Peretz, Benjamin Ratson, Tal Ben-Izhack, Gil Davidovich, Moshe Blumer, Sigalit Children (Basel) Article Background: Individuals with tooth agenesis often present a significant clinical challenge for dental practitioners. This retrospective study evaluated clinical and radiological long-term functional and esthetic outcomes following restoration using primary teeth to support fixed all-ceramic prosthesis in patients with teeth agenesis. Methods: Patients with teeth agenesis and at least one year follow-up were included. Examinations included panoramic X-ray, clinical examination and family history records. Only primary teeth without permanent teeth underneath were chosen. All ceramic fixed restorations were used. All data were collected from patient files. Outcome parameters included: restoration parameters (restoration survival, restoration fractures, restoration detachment, restoration replacement, and secondary caries), plaque index, and gingival index. Results: The study included 58 porcelain restorations inserted in 25 individuals; mean age 12 ± 2.1 years (range 10–19 years); mean number of missing teeth 12.3 ± 9 (range 6–12). Mean follow-up 48 ± 6 months (range 12–60 months). All restorations survived up to last follow-up, rendering a survival rate of 100%. Restorations outcome—porcelain chipping (9%), detachment (2%), no restoration replacement nor secondary caries, mean gingival index—0.7 ± 0.5 and mean plaque index—0.9 ± 0.3. Conclusions: In tooth agenesis, restoration using primary teeth to support fixed all-ceramic prosthesis is a viable treatment alternative. MDPI 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9221699/ /pubmed/35740741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9060804 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Naishlos, Sarit Chaushu, Liat Ghelfan, Oded Nissan, Joseph Peretz, Benjamin Ratson, Tal Ben-Izhack, Gil Davidovich, Moshe Blumer, Sigalit Primary Teeth Supported Fixed Prosthesis—A Predictable Treatment Alternative |
title | Primary Teeth Supported Fixed Prosthesis—A Predictable Treatment Alternative |
title_full | Primary Teeth Supported Fixed Prosthesis—A Predictable Treatment Alternative |
title_fullStr | Primary Teeth Supported Fixed Prosthesis—A Predictable Treatment Alternative |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary Teeth Supported Fixed Prosthesis—A Predictable Treatment Alternative |
title_short | Primary Teeth Supported Fixed Prosthesis—A Predictable Treatment Alternative |
title_sort | primary teeth supported fixed prosthesis—a predictable treatment alternative |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35740741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9060804 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naishlossarit primaryteethsupportedfixedprosthesisapredictabletreatmentalternative AT chaushuliat primaryteethsupportedfixedprosthesisapredictabletreatmentalternative AT ghelfanoded primaryteethsupportedfixedprosthesisapredictabletreatmentalternative AT nissanjoseph primaryteethsupportedfixedprosthesisapredictabletreatmentalternative AT peretzbenjamin primaryteethsupportedfixedprosthesisapredictabletreatmentalternative AT ratsontal primaryteethsupportedfixedprosthesisapredictabletreatmentalternative AT benizhackgil primaryteethsupportedfixedprosthesisapredictabletreatmentalternative AT davidovichmoshe primaryteethsupportedfixedprosthesisapredictabletreatmentalternative AT blumersigalit primaryteethsupportedfixedprosthesisapredictabletreatmentalternative |