Cargando…

Application of Negative Pressure Therapy on Skin Grafts after Soft-Tissue Reconstruction: A Prospective Observational Study

A split-thickness skin graft (STSG) is one of the main tools used in the reconstruction of skin defects. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been widely used as adjunct therapy for wound healing for decades. Few studies have conducted the outcomes of NPWT use as a postoperative dressing for S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mandili, Aeshah, Aljubairy, Abdullah, Alsharif, Bayan, Patwa, Wala, Alotibey, Khlood, Basha, Sara, Alharbi, Ziyad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35735663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clinpract12030044
_version_ 1784732696474288128
author Mandili, Aeshah
Aljubairy, Abdullah
Alsharif, Bayan
Patwa, Wala
Alotibey, Khlood
Basha, Sara
Alharbi, Ziyad
author_facet Mandili, Aeshah
Aljubairy, Abdullah
Alsharif, Bayan
Patwa, Wala
Alotibey, Khlood
Basha, Sara
Alharbi, Ziyad
author_sort Mandili, Aeshah
collection PubMed
description A split-thickness skin graft (STSG) is one of the main tools used in the reconstruction of skin defects. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been widely used as adjunct therapy for wound healing for decades. Few studies have conducted the outcomes of NPWT use as a postoperative dressing for STSGs. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the application of NPWT versus conventional dressing on STSGs after soft-tissue reconstruction. A prospective observational study was performed at the King Abdullah Medical City. A total of 18 patients with STSGs for acute or chronic skin defects were recruited. Patients from the two groups—10 patients in the NPWT group and 8 in the No-NPWT group—were postoperatively evaluated for three weeks. Assessment included the STSG take rate, wound healing, pain, infection, hematoma formation, and the need to re-graft the same recipient area. Our data demonstrated a higher mean skin graft take rate in the second and third weeks of the No-NPWT group compared to the NPWT group, but it was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). No significant differences between the two groups in terms of wound healing, pain, infection, hematoma formation, and the need to re-graft (p > 0.05) were found. Our study showed that the conventional dressing of STSGs is not inferior to NPWT. In addition, conventional dressing was shown to be easier to use and less expensive to apply, as well as having a higher skin graft take rate and lower infection rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9221738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92217382022-06-24 Application of Negative Pressure Therapy on Skin Grafts after Soft-Tissue Reconstruction: A Prospective Observational Study Mandili, Aeshah Aljubairy, Abdullah Alsharif, Bayan Patwa, Wala Alotibey, Khlood Basha, Sara Alharbi, Ziyad Clin Pract Article A split-thickness skin graft (STSG) is one of the main tools used in the reconstruction of skin defects. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been widely used as adjunct therapy for wound healing for decades. Few studies have conducted the outcomes of NPWT use as a postoperative dressing for STSGs. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the application of NPWT versus conventional dressing on STSGs after soft-tissue reconstruction. A prospective observational study was performed at the King Abdullah Medical City. A total of 18 patients with STSGs for acute or chronic skin defects were recruited. Patients from the two groups—10 patients in the NPWT group and 8 in the No-NPWT group—were postoperatively evaluated for three weeks. Assessment included the STSG take rate, wound healing, pain, infection, hematoma formation, and the need to re-graft the same recipient area. Our data demonstrated a higher mean skin graft take rate in the second and third weeks of the No-NPWT group compared to the NPWT group, but it was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). No significant differences between the two groups in terms of wound healing, pain, infection, hematoma formation, and the need to re-graft (p > 0.05) were found. Our study showed that the conventional dressing of STSGs is not inferior to NPWT. In addition, conventional dressing was shown to be easier to use and less expensive to apply, as well as having a higher skin graft take rate and lower infection rate. MDPI 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9221738/ /pubmed/35735663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clinpract12030044 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mandili, Aeshah
Aljubairy, Abdullah
Alsharif, Bayan
Patwa, Wala
Alotibey, Khlood
Basha, Sara
Alharbi, Ziyad
Application of Negative Pressure Therapy on Skin Grafts after Soft-Tissue Reconstruction: A Prospective Observational Study
title Application of Negative Pressure Therapy on Skin Grafts after Soft-Tissue Reconstruction: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Application of Negative Pressure Therapy on Skin Grafts after Soft-Tissue Reconstruction: A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Application of Negative Pressure Therapy on Skin Grafts after Soft-Tissue Reconstruction: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Application of Negative Pressure Therapy on Skin Grafts after Soft-Tissue Reconstruction: A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Application of Negative Pressure Therapy on Skin Grafts after Soft-Tissue Reconstruction: A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort application of negative pressure therapy on skin grafts after soft-tissue reconstruction: a prospective observational study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35735663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clinpract12030044
work_keys_str_mv AT mandiliaeshah applicationofnegativepressuretherapyonskingraftsaftersofttissuereconstructionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT aljubairyabdullah applicationofnegativepressuretherapyonskingraftsaftersofttissuereconstructionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT alsharifbayan applicationofnegativepressuretherapyonskingraftsaftersofttissuereconstructionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT patwawala applicationofnegativepressuretherapyonskingraftsaftersofttissuereconstructionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT alotibeykhlood applicationofnegativepressuretherapyonskingraftsaftersofttissuereconstructionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT bashasara applicationofnegativepressuretherapyonskingraftsaftersofttissuereconstructionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT alharbiziyad applicationofnegativepressuretherapyonskingraftsaftersofttissuereconstructionaprospectiveobservationalstudy