Cargando…
Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study
Since the identification of the new severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a huge effort in terms of diagnostic strategies has been deployed. To date, serological assays represent a valuable tool for the identification of recovered COVID-19 patients and for the monitoring of immune...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061509 |
_version_ | 1784732730154549248 |
---|---|
author | Bergami, Federica Arena, Francesca Pattonieri, Eleonora Francesca Gregorini, Marilena Meloni, Federica Abelli, Massimo Ticozzelli, Elena Testa, Giorgia Lilleri, Daniele Cassaniti, Irene Baldanti, Fausto |
author_facet | Bergami, Federica Arena, Francesca Pattonieri, Eleonora Francesca Gregorini, Marilena Meloni, Federica Abelli, Massimo Ticozzelli, Elena Testa, Giorgia Lilleri, Daniele Cassaniti, Irene Baldanti, Fausto |
author_sort | Bergami, Federica |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the identification of the new severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a huge effort in terms of diagnostic strategies has been deployed. To date, serological assays represent a valuable tool for the identification of recovered COVID-19 patients and for the monitoring of immune response elicited by vaccination. However, the role of T-cell response should be better clarified and simple and easy to perform assays should be routinely introduced. The main aim of this study was to compare a home-made assay for whole blood stimulation with a standardized ELISpot assay design in our laboratory for the assessment of spike-specific T-cell response in vaccinated subjects. Even if a good correlation between the assays was reported, a higher percentage of responder subjects was reported for immunocompromised subjects with ELISpot assay (56%) than home-made whole blood stimulation assay (33%). Additionally, three commercial assays were compared with our home-made assay, reporting a good agreement in terms of both positive and negative results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9221863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92218632022-06-24 Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study Bergami, Federica Arena, Francesca Pattonieri, Eleonora Francesca Gregorini, Marilena Meloni, Federica Abelli, Massimo Ticozzelli, Elena Testa, Giorgia Lilleri, Daniele Cassaniti, Irene Baldanti, Fausto Diagnostics (Basel) Brief Report Since the identification of the new severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a huge effort in terms of diagnostic strategies has been deployed. To date, serological assays represent a valuable tool for the identification of recovered COVID-19 patients and for the monitoring of immune response elicited by vaccination. However, the role of T-cell response should be better clarified and simple and easy to perform assays should be routinely introduced. The main aim of this study was to compare a home-made assay for whole blood stimulation with a standardized ELISpot assay design in our laboratory for the assessment of spike-specific T-cell response in vaccinated subjects. Even if a good correlation between the assays was reported, a higher percentage of responder subjects was reported for immunocompromised subjects with ELISpot assay (56%) than home-made whole blood stimulation assay (33%). Additionally, three commercial assays were compared with our home-made assay, reporting a good agreement in terms of both positive and negative results. MDPI 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9221863/ /pubmed/35741317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061509 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Bergami, Federica Arena, Francesca Pattonieri, Eleonora Francesca Gregorini, Marilena Meloni, Federica Abelli, Massimo Ticozzelli, Elena Testa, Giorgia Lilleri, Daniele Cassaniti, Irene Baldanti, Fausto Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | performance of whole blood stimulation assays for the quantification of sars-cov-2 specific t-cell response: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergamifederica performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy AT arenafrancesca performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy AT pattonierieleonorafrancesca performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy AT gregorinimarilena performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy AT melonifederica performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy AT abellimassimo performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy AT ticozzellielena performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy AT testagiorgia performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy AT lilleridaniele performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy AT cassanitiirene performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy AT baldantifausto performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy |