Cargando…

Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study

Since the identification of the new severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a huge effort in terms of diagnostic strategies has been deployed. To date, serological assays represent a valuable tool for the identification of recovered COVID-19 patients and for the monitoring of immune...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergami, Federica, Arena, Francesca, Pattonieri, Eleonora Francesca, Gregorini, Marilena, Meloni, Federica, Abelli, Massimo, Ticozzelli, Elena, Testa, Giorgia, Lilleri, Daniele, Cassaniti, Irene, Baldanti, Fausto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741317
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061509
_version_ 1784732730154549248
author Bergami, Federica
Arena, Francesca
Pattonieri, Eleonora Francesca
Gregorini, Marilena
Meloni, Federica
Abelli, Massimo
Ticozzelli, Elena
Testa, Giorgia
Lilleri, Daniele
Cassaniti, Irene
Baldanti, Fausto
author_facet Bergami, Federica
Arena, Francesca
Pattonieri, Eleonora Francesca
Gregorini, Marilena
Meloni, Federica
Abelli, Massimo
Ticozzelli, Elena
Testa, Giorgia
Lilleri, Daniele
Cassaniti, Irene
Baldanti, Fausto
author_sort Bergami, Federica
collection PubMed
description Since the identification of the new severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a huge effort in terms of diagnostic strategies has been deployed. To date, serological assays represent a valuable tool for the identification of recovered COVID-19 patients and for the monitoring of immune response elicited by vaccination. However, the role of T-cell response should be better clarified and simple and easy to perform assays should be routinely introduced. The main aim of this study was to compare a home-made assay for whole blood stimulation with a standardized ELISpot assay design in our laboratory for the assessment of spike-specific T-cell response in vaccinated subjects. Even if a good correlation between the assays was reported, a higher percentage of responder subjects was reported for immunocompromised subjects with ELISpot assay (56%) than home-made whole blood stimulation assay (33%). Additionally, three commercial assays were compared with our home-made assay, reporting a good agreement in terms of both positive and negative results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9221863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92218632022-06-24 Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study Bergami, Federica Arena, Francesca Pattonieri, Eleonora Francesca Gregorini, Marilena Meloni, Federica Abelli, Massimo Ticozzelli, Elena Testa, Giorgia Lilleri, Daniele Cassaniti, Irene Baldanti, Fausto Diagnostics (Basel) Brief Report Since the identification of the new severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a huge effort in terms of diagnostic strategies has been deployed. To date, serological assays represent a valuable tool for the identification of recovered COVID-19 patients and for the monitoring of immune response elicited by vaccination. However, the role of T-cell response should be better clarified and simple and easy to perform assays should be routinely introduced. The main aim of this study was to compare a home-made assay for whole blood stimulation with a standardized ELISpot assay design in our laboratory for the assessment of spike-specific T-cell response in vaccinated subjects. Even if a good correlation between the assays was reported, a higher percentage of responder subjects was reported for immunocompromised subjects with ELISpot assay (56%) than home-made whole blood stimulation assay (33%). Additionally, three commercial assays were compared with our home-made assay, reporting a good agreement in terms of both positive and negative results. MDPI 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9221863/ /pubmed/35741317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061509 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Bergami, Federica
Arena, Francesca
Pattonieri, Eleonora Francesca
Gregorini, Marilena
Meloni, Federica
Abelli, Massimo
Ticozzelli, Elena
Testa, Giorgia
Lilleri, Daniele
Cassaniti, Irene
Baldanti, Fausto
Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Performance of Whole Blood Stimulation Assays for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Specific T-Cell Response: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort performance of whole blood stimulation assays for the quantification of sars-cov-2 specific t-cell response: a cross-sectional study
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741317
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061509
work_keys_str_mv AT bergamifederica performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy
AT arenafrancesca performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy
AT pattonierieleonorafrancesca performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy
AT gregorinimarilena performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy
AT melonifederica performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy
AT abellimassimo performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy
AT ticozzellielena performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy
AT testagiorgia performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy
AT lilleridaniele performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy
AT cassanitiirene performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy
AT baldantifausto performanceofwholebloodstimulationassaysforthequantificationofsarscov2specifictcellresponseacrosssectionalstudy