Cargando…
Assessment of Orbital Compartment Pressure: A Comprehensive Review
The orbit is a closed compartment defined by the orbital bones and the orbital septum. Some diseases of the orbit and the optic nerve are associated with an increased orbital compartment pressure (OCP), e.g., retrobulbar hemorrhage or thyroid eye disease. Our aim was to review the literature on the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061481 |
_version_ | 1784732753575542784 |
---|---|
author | Enz, Tim J. Tschopp, Markus |
author_facet | Enz, Tim J. Tschopp, Markus |
author_sort | Enz, Tim J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The orbit is a closed compartment defined by the orbital bones and the orbital septum. Some diseases of the orbit and the optic nerve are associated with an increased orbital compartment pressure (OCP), e.g., retrobulbar hemorrhage or thyroid eye disease. Our aim was to review the literature on the different approaches to assess OCP. Historically, an assessment of the tissue resistance provoked by the retropulsion of the eye bulb was the method of choice for estimating OCP, either by digital palpation or with specifically designed devices. We found a total of 20 articles reporting direct OCP measurement in animals, cadavers and humans. In nine studies, OCP was directly measured in humans, of which five used a minimally invasive approach. Two groups used experimental/custom devices, whilst the others applied commercially available devices commonly used for monitoring the compartment syndromes of the limbs. None of the nine articles on direct OCP measurements in humans reported complications. Today, OCP is mainly estimated using clinical findings considered surrogates, e.g., elevated intraocular pressure or proptosis. These diagnostic markers appear to reliably indicate elevated OCP. However, particularly minimally invasive approaches show promises for direct OCP measurements. In the future, more sophisticated, specifically designed equipment might allow for even better and safer measurements and hence facilitate the diagnosis and monitoring of orbital diseases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9221953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92219532022-06-24 Assessment of Orbital Compartment Pressure: A Comprehensive Review Enz, Tim J. Tschopp, Markus Diagnostics (Basel) Review The orbit is a closed compartment defined by the orbital bones and the orbital septum. Some diseases of the orbit and the optic nerve are associated with an increased orbital compartment pressure (OCP), e.g., retrobulbar hemorrhage or thyroid eye disease. Our aim was to review the literature on the different approaches to assess OCP. Historically, an assessment of the tissue resistance provoked by the retropulsion of the eye bulb was the method of choice for estimating OCP, either by digital palpation or with specifically designed devices. We found a total of 20 articles reporting direct OCP measurement in animals, cadavers and humans. In nine studies, OCP was directly measured in humans, of which five used a minimally invasive approach. Two groups used experimental/custom devices, whilst the others applied commercially available devices commonly used for monitoring the compartment syndromes of the limbs. None of the nine articles on direct OCP measurements in humans reported complications. Today, OCP is mainly estimated using clinical findings considered surrogates, e.g., elevated intraocular pressure or proptosis. These diagnostic markers appear to reliably indicate elevated OCP. However, particularly minimally invasive approaches show promises for direct OCP measurements. In the future, more sophisticated, specifically designed equipment might allow for even better and safer measurements and hence facilitate the diagnosis and monitoring of orbital diseases. MDPI 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9221953/ /pubmed/35741290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061481 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Enz, Tim J. Tschopp, Markus Assessment of Orbital Compartment Pressure: A Comprehensive Review |
title | Assessment of Orbital Compartment Pressure: A Comprehensive Review |
title_full | Assessment of Orbital Compartment Pressure: A Comprehensive Review |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Orbital Compartment Pressure: A Comprehensive Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Orbital Compartment Pressure: A Comprehensive Review |
title_short | Assessment of Orbital Compartment Pressure: A Comprehensive Review |
title_sort | assessment of orbital compartment pressure: a comprehensive review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9221953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061481 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT enztimj assessmentoforbitalcompartmentpressureacomprehensivereview AT tschoppmarkus assessmentoforbitalcompartmentpressureacomprehensivereview |