Cargando…
Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions
Background: The purpose of the present study was the evaluation of the image quality of polyenergetic and monoenergetic reconstructions (PERs and MERs) of CT angiographies (CTAs) of the head and neck acquired with the novel photon counting CT (PCCT) method in clinical routine. Methods: Thirty-seven...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061306 |
_version_ | 1784732786519703552 |
---|---|
author | Michael, Arwed Elias Boriesosdick, Jan Schoenbeck, Denise Lopez-Schmidt, Ingo Kroeger, Jan Robert Moenninghoff, Christoph Horstmeier, Sebastian Pennig, Lenhard Borggrefe, Jan Niehoff, Julius Henning |
author_facet | Michael, Arwed Elias Boriesosdick, Jan Schoenbeck, Denise Lopez-Schmidt, Ingo Kroeger, Jan Robert Moenninghoff, Christoph Horstmeier, Sebastian Pennig, Lenhard Borggrefe, Jan Niehoff, Julius Henning |
author_sort | Michael, Arwed Elias |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The purpose of the present study was the evaluation of the image quality of polyenergetic and monoenergetic reconstructions (PERs and MERs) of CT angiographies (CTAs) of the head and neck acquired with the novel photon counting CT (PCCT) method in clinical routine. Methods: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Quantitative image parameters of the extracranial, intracranial and cerebral arteries were evaluated for the PER and MER (40–120 keV). Additionally, two radiologists rated the perceived image quality. Results: The mean CTDI(vol) used in the PCCT was 8.31 ± 1.19 mGy. The highest signal within the vessels was detected in the 40 keV MER, whereas the lowest noise was detected in the 115 keV MER. The most favorable contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) were detected in the PER and low keV MER. In the qualitative image analysis, the PER was superior to the MER in all rated criteria. For MER, 60–65 keV was rated as best image quality. Conclusion: Overall, PCCT offers excellent image quality for CTAs of the head and neck. At the current state, the PER of the PCCT seems to be the most favorable reconstruction for diagnostic reporting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9222087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92220872022-06-24 Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions Michael, Arwed Elias Boriesosdick, Jan Schoenbeck, Denise Lopez-Schmidt, Ingo Kroeger, Jan Robert Moenninghoff, Christoph Horstmeier, Sebastian Pennig, Lenhard Borggrefe, Jan Niehoff, Julius Henning Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: The purpose of the present study was the evaluation of the image quality of polyenergetic and monoenergetic reconstructions (PERs and MERs) of CT angiographies (CTAs) of the head and neck acquired with the novel photon counting CT (PCCT) method in clinical routine. Methods: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Quantitative image parameters of the extracranial, intracranial and cerebral arteries were evaluated for the PER and MER (40–120 keV). Additionally, two radiologists rated the perceived image quality. Results: The mean CTDI(vol) used in the PCCT was 8.31 ± 1.19 mGy. The highest signal within the vessels was detected in the 40 keV MER, whereas the lowest noise was detected in the 115 keV MER. The most favorable contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) were detected in the PER and low keV MER. In the qualitative image analysis, the PER was superior to the MER in all rated criteria. For MER, 60–65 keV was rated as best image quality. Conclusion: Overall, PCCT offers excellent image quality for CTAs of the head and neck. At the current state, the PER of the PCCT seems to be the most favorable reconstruction for diagnostic reporting. MDPI 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9222087/ /pubmed/35741116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061306 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Michael, Arwed Elias Boriesosdick, Jan Schoenbeck, Denise Lopez-Schmidt, Ingo Kroeger, Jan Robert Moenninghoff, Christoph Horstmeier, Sebastian Pennig, Lenhard Borggrefe, Jan Niehoff, Julius Henning Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions |
title | Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions |
title_full | Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions |
title_fullStr | Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions |
title_full_unstemmed | Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions |
title_short | Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions |
title_sort | photon counting ct angiography of the head and neck: image quality assessment of polyenergetic and virtual monoenergetic reconstructions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061306 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT michaelarwedelias photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions AT boriesosdickjan photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions AT schoenbeckdenise photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions AT lopezschmidtingo photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions AT kroegerjanrobert photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions AT moenninghoffchristoph photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions AT horstmeiersebastian photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions AT penniglenhard photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions AT borggrefejan photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions AT niehoffjuliushenning photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions |