Cargando…

Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions

Background: The purpose of the present study was the evaluation of the image quality of polyenergetic and monoenergetic reconstructions (PERs and MERs) of CT angiographies (CTAs) of the head and neck acquired with the novel photon counting CT (PCCT) method in clinical routine. Methods: Thirty-seven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael, Arwed Elias, Boriesosdick, Jan, Schoenbeck, Denise, Lopez-Schmidt, Ingo, Kroeger, Jan Robert, Moenninghoff, Christoph, Horstmeier, Sebastian, Pennig, Lenhard, Borggrefe, Jan, Niehoff, Julius Henning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061306
_version_ 1784732786519703552
author Michael, Arwed Elias
Boriesosdick, Jan
Schoenbeck, Denise
Lopez-Schmidt, Ingo
Kroeger, Jan Robert
Moenninghoff, Christoph
Horstmeier, Sebastian
Pennig, Lenhard
Borggrefe, Jan
Niehoff, Julius Henning
author_facet Michael, Arwed Elias
Boriesosdick, Jan
Schoenbeck, Denise
Lopez-Schmidt, Ingo
Kroeger, Jan Robert
Moenninghoff, Christoph
Horstmeier, Sebastian
Pennig, Lenhard
Borggrefe, Jan
Niehoff, Julius Henning
author_sort Michael, Arwed Elias
collection PubMed
description Background: The purpose of the present study was the evaluation of the image quality of polyenergetic and monoenergetic reconstructions (PERs and MERs) of CT angiographies (CTAs) of the head and neck acquired with the novel photon counting CT (PCCT) method in clinical routine. Methods: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Quantitative image parameters of the extracranial, intracranial and cerebral arteries were evaluated for the PER and MER (40–120 keV). Additionally, two radiologists rated the perceived image quality. Results: The mean CTDI(vol) used in the PCCT was 8.31 ± 1.19 mGy. The highest signal within the vessels was detected in the 40 keV MER, whereas the lowest noise was detected in the 115 keV MER. The most favorable contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) were detected in the PER and low keV MER. In the qualitative image analysis, the PER was superior to the MER in all rated criteria. For MER, 60–65 keV was rated as best image quality. Conclusion: Overall, PCCT offers excellent image quality for CTAs of the head and neck. At the current state, the PER of the PCCT seems to be the most favorable reconstruction for diagnostic reporting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9222087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92220872022-06-24 Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions Michael, Arwed Elias Boriesosdick, Jan Schoenbeck, Denise Lopez-Schmidt, Ingo Kroeger, Jan Robert Moenninghoff, Christoph Horstmeier, Sebastian Pennig, Lenhard Borggrefe, Jan Niehoff, Julius Henning Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: The purpose of the present study was the evaluation of the image quality of polyenergetic and monoenergetic reconstructions (PERs and MERs) of CT angiographies (CTAs) of the head and neck acquired with the novel photon counting CT (PCCT) method in clinical routine. Methods: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Quantitative image parameters of the extracranial, intracranial and cerebral arteries were evaluated for the PER and MER (40–120 keV). Additionally, two radiologists rated the perceived image quality. Results: The mean CTDI(vol) used in the PCCT was 8.31 ± 1.19 mGy. The highest signal within the vessels was detected in the 40 keV MER, whereas the lowest noise was detected in the 115 keV MER. The most favorable contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) were detected in the PER and low keV MER. In the qualitative image analysis, the PER was superior to the MER in all rated criteria. For MER, 60–65 keV was rated as best image quality. Conclusion: Overall, PCCT offers excellent image quality for CTAs of the head and neck. At the current state, the PER of the PCCT seems to be the most favorable reconstruction for diagnostic reporting. MDPI 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9222087/ /pubmed/35741116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061306 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Michael, Arwed Elias
Boriesosdick, Jan
Schoenbeck, Denise
Lopez-Schmidt, Ingo
Kroeger, Jan Robert
Moenninghoff, Christoph
Horstmeier, Sebastian
Pennig, Lenhard
Borggrefe, Jan
Niehoff, Julius Henning
Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions
title Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions
title_full Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions
title_fullStr Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions
title_full_unstemmed Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions
title_short Photon Counting CT Angiography of the Head and Neck: Image Quality Assessment of Polyenergetic and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions
title_sort photon counting ct angiography of the head and neck: image quality assessment of polyenergetic and virtual monoenergetic reconstructions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061306
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelarwedelias photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions
AT boriesosdickjan photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions
AT schoenbeckdenise photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions
AT lopezschmidtingo photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions
AT kroegerjanrobert photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions
AT moenninghoffchristoph photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions
AT horstmeiersebastian photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions
AT penniglenhard photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions
AT borggrefejan photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions
AT niehoffjuliushenning photoncountingctangiographyoftheheadandneckimagequalityassessmentofpolyenergeticandvirtualmonoenergeticreconstructions