Cargando…

The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort

Liver fibrosis is the most significant prognostic factor in chronic liver disease (CLD). Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of non-invasive techniques, such as two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE), to assess liver stiffness as a marker of fibrosis. Several other factors influ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Popa, Alexandru, Sporea, Ioan, Bende, Felix, Popescu, Alina, Fofiu, Renata, Borlea, Andreea, Bâldea, Victor, Pascu, Ariana, Foncea, Camelia Gianina, Cotrău, Radu, Șirli, Roxana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061451
_version_ 1784732816908484608
author Popa, Alexandru
Sporea, Ioan
Bende, Felix
Popescu, Alina
Fofiu, Renata
Borlea, Andreea
Bâldea, Victor
Pascu, Ariana
Foncea, Camelia Gianina
Cotrău, Radu
Șirli, Roxana
author_facet Popa, Alexandru
Sporea, Ioan
Bende, Felix
Popescu, Alina
Fofiu, Renata
Borlea, Andreea
Bâldea, Victor
Pascu, Ariana
Foncea, Camelia Gianina
Cotrău, Radu
Șirli, Roxana
author_sort Popa, Alexandru
collection PubMed
description Liver fibrosis is the most significant prognostic factor in chronic liver disease (CLD). Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of non-invasive techniques, such as two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE), to assess liver stiffness as a marker of fibrosis. Several other factors influence liver stiffness in addition to liver fibrosis. It is presumed that changes due to necro-inflammation modify the propagation of shear waves (dispersion). Therefore, new imaging techniques that investigate the dispersion properties of shear waves have been developed, which can serve as an indirect method of measuring liver viscosity (Vi PLUS). Defining the reference values in healthy subjects among different age groups and genders and analyzing the factors that influence these values is essential. However, published data on liver viscosity are still limited. This is the first study that aimed to assess the normal range of liver viscosity values in subjects with healthy livers and analyze the factors that influence them. One hundred and thirty-one consecutive subjects with healthy livers were enrolled in this prospective study. The results showed that Vi PLUS is a highly feasible method. Liver stiffness, age and BMI influenced the liver viscosity values. The mean liver viscosity by Vi PLUS in subjects with healthy livers was 1.59 Pa·s.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9222204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92222042022-06-24 The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort Popa, Alexandru Sporea, Ioan Bende, Felix Popescu, Alina Fofiu, Renata Borlea, Andreea Bâldea, Victor Pascu, Ariana Foncea, Camelia Gianina Cotrău, Radu Șirli, Roxana Diagnostics (Basel) Article Liver fibrosis is the most significant prognostic factor in chronic liver disease (CLD). Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of non-invasive techniques, such as two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE), to assess liver stiffness as a marker of fibrosis. Several other factors influence liver stiffness in addition to liver fibrosis. It is presumed that changes due to necro-inflammation modify the propagation of shear waves (dispersion). Therefore, new imaging techniques that investigate the dispersion properties of shear waves have been developed, which can serve as an indirect method of measuring liver viscosity (Vi PLUS). Defining the reference values in healthy subjects among different age groups and genders and analyzing the factors that influence these values is essential. However, published data on liver viscosity are still limited. This is the first study that aimed to assess the normal range of liver viscosity values in subjects with healthy livers and analyze the factors that influence them. One hundred and thirty-one consecutive subjects with healthy livers were enrolled in this prospective study. The results showed that Vi PLUS is a highly feasible method. Liver stiffness, age and BMI influenced the liver viscosity values. The mean liver viscosity by Vi PLUS in subjects with healthy livers was 1.59 Pa·s. MDPI 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9222204/ /pubmed/35741261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061451 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Popa, Alexandru
Sporea, Ioan
Bende, Felix
Popescu, Alina
Fofiu, Renata
Borlea, Andreea
Bâldea, Victor
Pascu, Ariana
Foncea, Camelia Gianina
Cotrău, Radu
Șirli, Roxana
The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort
title The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort
title_full The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort
title_fullStr The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort
title_full_unstemmed The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort
title_short The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort
title_sort non-invasive ultrasound-based assessment of liver viscosity in a healthy cohort
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061451
work_keys_str_mv AT popaalexandru thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT sporeaioan thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT bendefelix thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT popescualina thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT fofiurenata thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT borleaandreea thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT baldeavictor thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT pascuariana thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT fonceacameliagianina thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT cotrauradu thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT sirliroxana thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT popaalexandru noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT sporeaioan noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT bendefelix noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT popescualina noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT fofiurenata noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT borleaandreea noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT baldeavictor noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT pascuariana noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT fonceacameliagianina noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT cotrauradu noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort
AT sirliroxana noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort