Cargando…
The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort
Liver fibrosis is the most significant prognostic factor in chronic liver disease (CLD). Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of non-invasive techniques, such as two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE), to assess liver stiffness as a marker of fibrosis. Several other factors influ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061451 |
_version_ | 1784732816908484608 |
---|---|
author | Popa, Alexandru Sporea, Ioan Bende, Felix Popescu, Alina Fofiu, Renata Borlea, Andreea Bâldea, Victor Pascu, Ariana Foncea, Camelia Gianina Cotrău, Radu Șirli, Roxana |
author_facet | Popa, Alexandru Sporea, Ioan Bende, Felix Popescu, Alina Fofiu, Renata Borlea, Andreea Bâldea, Victor Pascu, Ariana Foncea, Camelia Gianina Cotrău, Radu Șirli, Roxana |
author_sort | Popa, Alexandru |
collection | PubMed |
description | Liver fibrosis is the most significant prognostic factor in chronic liver disease (CLD). Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of non-invasive techniques, such as two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE), to assess liver stiffness as a marker of fibrosis. Several other factors influence liver stiffness in addition to liver fibrosis. It is presumed that changes due to necro-inflammation modify the propagation of shear waves (dispersion). Therefore, new imaging techniques that investigate the dispersion properties of shear waves have been developed, which can serve as an indirect method of measuring liver viscosity (Vi PLUS). Defining the reference values in healthy subjects among different age groups and genders and analyzing the factors that influence these values is essential. However, published data on liver viscosity are still limited. This is the first study that aimed to assess the normal range of liver viscosity values in subjects with healthy livers and analyze the factors that influence them. One hundred and thirty-one consecutive subjects with healthy livers were enrolled in this prospective study. The results showed that Vi PLUS is a highly feasible method. Liver stiffness, age and BMI influenced the liver viscosity values. The mean liver viscosity by Vi PLUS in subjects with healthy livers was 1.59 Pa·s. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9222204 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92222042022-06-24 The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort Popa, Alexandru Sporea, Ioan Bende, Felix Popescu, Alina Fofiu, Renata Borlea, Andreea Bâldea, Victor Pascu, Ariana Foncea, Camelia Gianina Cotrău, Radu Șirli, Roxana Diagnostics (Basel) Article Liver fibrosis is the most significant prognostic factor in chronic liver disease (CLD). Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of non-invasive techniques, such as two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE), to assess liver stiffness as a marker of fibrosis. Several other factors influence liver stiffness in addition to liver fibrosis. It is presumed that changes due to necro-inflammation modify the propagation of shear waves (dispersion). Therefore, new imaging techniques that investigate the dispersion properties of shear waves have been developed, which can serve as an indirect method of measuring liver viscosity (Vi PLUS). Defining the reference values in healthy subjects among different age groups and genders and analyzing the factors that influence these values is essential. However, published data on liver viscosity are still limited. This is the first study that aimed to assess the normal range of liver viscosity values in subjects with healthy livers and analyze the factors that influence them. One hundred and thirty-one consecutive subjects with healthy livers were enrolled in this prospective study. The results showed that Vi PLUS is a highly feasible method. Liver stiffness, age and BMI influenced the liver viscosity values. The mean liver viscosity by Vi PLUS in subjects with healthy livers was 1.59 Pa·s. MDPI 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9222204/ /pubmed/35741261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061451 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Popa, Alexandru Sporea, Ioan Bende, Felix Popescu, Alina Fofiu, Renata Borlea, Andreea Bâldea, Victor Pascu, Ariana Foncea, Camelia Gianina Cotrău, Radu Șirli, Roxana The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort |
title | The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort |
title_full | The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort |
title_fullStr | The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort |
title_short | The Non-Invasive Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Liver Viscosity in a Healthy Cohort |
title_sort | non-invasive ultrasound-based assessment of liver viscosity in a healthy cohort |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061451 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT popaalexandru thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT sporeaioan thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT bendefelix thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT popescualina thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT fofiurenata thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT borleaandreea thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT baldeavictor thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT pascuariana thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT fonceacameliagianina thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT cotrauradu thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT sirliroxana thenoninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT popaalexandru noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT sporeaioan noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT bendefelix noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT popescualina noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT fofiurenata noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT borleaandreea noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT baldeavictor noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT pascuariana noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT fonceacameliagianina noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT cotrauradu noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort AT sirliroxana noninvasiveultrasoundbasedassessmentofliverviscosityinahealthycohort |