Cargando…
Evaluation of viral concentration and extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 recovery from wastewater using droplet digital and quantitative RT-PCR
The ongoing pandemic caused by the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in millions of deaths worldwide despite the various measures announced by the authorities. Wastewater-based epidemiology has the ability to provide a day-to-day estimation of the number of infected people in a fast and cost-effe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100224 |
_version_ | 1784732821147877376 |
---|---|
author | Dimitrakopoulos, Lampros Kontou, Aikaterini Strati, Areti Galani, Aikaterini Kostakis, Marios Kapes, Vasileios Lianidou, Evrikleia Thomaidis, Nikolaos Markou, Athina |
author_facet | Dimitrakopoulos, Lampros Kontou, Aikaterini Strati, Areti Galani, Aikaterini Kostakis, Marios Kapes, Vasileios Lianidou, Evrikleia Thomaidis, Nikolaos Markou, Athina |
author_sort | Dimitrakopoulos, Lampros |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ongoing pandemic caused by the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in millions of deaths worldwide despite the various measures announced by the authorities. Wastewater-based epidemiology has the ability to provide a day-to-day estimation of the number of infected people in a fast and cost-effective manner. However, owing to the complex nature of wastewater, wastewater monitoring for viral genome copies is affected by the extensive viral fragmentation that takes place all the way to the sewage and the analytical lab. The aim of this study was to evaluate different methodologies for the concentration and extraction of viruses in wastewaters and to select and improve an option that maximizes the recovery of SARS-CoV-2. We compare 5 different concentration methods and 4 commercially available kits for the RNA extraction. To evaluate the performance and the recovery of these, SARS-CoV-2 isolated from patients was used as a spike control. Additionally, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in all wastewater samples was determined using reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR), targeting three genetic markers (N1, N2 and N3). Using spiked samples, recoveries were estimated 2.1–37.6% using different extraction kits and 0.1–2.1% using different concentration kits. It was found that a direct capture-based method, evaluated against a variety of concentration methods, is the best in terms of recovery, time and cost. Interestingly, we noticed a good agreement between the results provided by RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR in terms of recovery. This evaluation can serve as a guide for laboratories establishing a protocol to perform wastewater monitoring of SARS-CoV-2. Overall, data presented here reinforces the validity of WBE for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance, uncovers potential caveats in the selection of concentration and extraction protocols and points towards optimal solutions to maximize its potential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9222221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92222212022-06-24 Evaluation of viral concentration and extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 recovery from wastewater using droplet digital and quantitative RT-PCR Dimitrakopoulos, Lampros Kontou, Aikaterini Strati, Areti Galani, Aikaterini Kostakis, Marios Kapes, Vasileios Lianidou, Evrikleia Thomaidis, Nikolaos Markou, Athina Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering Case Report The ongoing pandemic caused by the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in millions of deaths worldwide despite the various measures announced by the authorities. Wastewater-based epidemiology has the ability to provide a day-to-day estimation of the number of infected people in a fast and cost-effective manner. However, owing to the complex nature of wastewater, wastewater monitoring for viral genome copies is affected by the extensive viral fragmentation that takes place all the way to the sewage and the analytical lab. The aim of this study was to evaluate different methodologies for the concentration and extraction of viruses in wastewaters and to select and improve an option that maximizes the recovery of SARS-CoV-2. We compare 5 different concentration methods and 4 commercially available kits for the RNA extraction. To evaluate the performance and the recovery of these, SARS-CoV-2 isolated from patients was used as a spike control. Additionally, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in all wastewater samples was determined using reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR), targeting three genetic markers (N1, N2 and N3). Using spiked samples, recoveries were estimated 2.1–37.6% using different extraction kits and 0.1–2.1% using different concentration kits. It was found that a direct capture-based method, evaluated against a variety of concentration methods, is the best in terms of recovery, time and cost. Interestingly, we noticed a good agreement between the results provided by RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR in terms of recovery. This evaluation can serve as a guide for laboratories establishing a protocol to perform wastewater monitoring of SARS-CoV-2. Overall, data presented here reinforces the validity of WBE for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance, uncovers potential caveats in the selection of concentration and extraction protocols and points towards optimal solutions to maximize its potential. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-12 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9222221/ /pubmed/37520924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100224 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Dimitrakopoulos, Lampros Kontou, Aikaterini Strati, Areti Galani, Aikaterini Kostakis, Marios Kapes, Vasileios Lianidou, Evrikleia Thomaidis, Nikolaos Markou, Athina Evaluation of viral concentration and extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 recovery from wastewater using droplet digital and quantitative RT-PCR |
title | Evaluation of viral concentration and extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 recovery from wastewater using droplet digital and quantitative RT-PCR |
title_full | Evaluation of viral concentration and extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 recovery from wastewater using droplet digital and quantitative RT-PCR |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of viral concentration and extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 recovery from wastewater using droplet digital and quantitative RT-PCR |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of viral concentration and extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 recovery from wastewater using droplet digital and quantitative RT-PCR |
title_short | Evaluation of viral concentration and extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 recovery from wastewater using droplet digital and quantitative RT-PCR |
title_sort | evaluation of viral concentration and extraction methods for sars-cov-2 recovery from wastewater using droplet digital and quantitative rt-pcr |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37520924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dimitrakopouloslampros evaluationofviralconcentrationandextractionmethodsforsarscov2recoveryfromwastewaterusingdropletdigitalandquantitativertpcr AT kontouaikaterini evaluationofviralconcentrationandextractionmethodsforsarscov2recoveryfromwastewaterusingdropletdigitalandquantitativertpcr AT stratiareti evaluationofviralconcentrationandextractionmethodsforsarscov2recoveryfromwastewaterusingdropletdigitalandquantitativertpcr AT galaniaikaterini evaluationofviralconcentrationandextractionmethodsforsarscov2recoveryfromwastewaterusingdropletdigitalandquantitativertpcr AT kostakismarios evaluationofviralconcentrationandextractionmethodsforsarscov2recoveryfromwastewaterusingdropletdigitalandquantitativertpcr AT kapesvasileios evaluationofviralconcentrationandextractionmethodsforsarscov2recoveryfromwastewaterusingdropletdigitalandquantitativertpcr AT lianidouevrikleia evaluationofviralconcentrationandextractionmethodsforsarscov2recoveryfromwastewaterusingdropletdigitalandquantitativertpcr AT thomaidisnikolaos evaluationofviralconcentrationandextractionmethodsforsarscov2recoveryfromwastewaterusingdropletdigitalandquantitativertpcr AT markouathina evaluationofviralconcentrationandextractionmethodsforsarscov2recoveryfromwastewaterusingdropletdigitalandquantitativertpcr |