Cargando…

The Influence of DNA Extraction Methods on Species Identification Results of Seafood Products

In terms of species identification, the ultimate aim of extracting DNA is the subsequent amplification of the selected marker; therefore, the quality and quantity of the extracted DNA must be sufficient for PCR-based methods. The purpose of this study is to compare five DNA extraction methods accord...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez-Riveiro, Rosalía, Velasco, Amaya, Sotelo, Carmen G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741937
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11121739
_version_ 1784732821860909056
author Rodríguez-Riveiro, Rosalía
Velasco, Amaya
Sotelo, Carmen G.
author_facet Rodríguez-Riveiro, Rosalía
Velasco, Amaya
Sotelo, Carmen G.
author_sort Rodríguez-Riveiro, Rosalía
collection PubMed
description In terms of species identification, the ultimate aim of extracting DNA is the subsequent amplification of the selected marker; therefore, the quality and quantity of the extracted DNA must be sufficient for PCR-based methods. The purpose of this study is to compare five DNA extraction methods according to the parameters of quantity, quality and simplicity, among others, in order to determine the most suitable method for identification for Cephalopoda, Gadiformes and Pleuronectiformes. The Wizard DNA clean-up system kit (Promega), MPure-12(TM) automated nucleic acid purification system (MP Biomedicals), Chelex 100 resin (Biorad), DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen) and a swab method were examined. The obtained DNA quantity was determined by fluorescence, and quality was evaluated with ratios of absorbance of A260/A280 and A260/A230 by agarose gel visualization of the extracts and by analyzing the success of PCR amplifications of 720 bp fragments of cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) for Cephalopods and 465 bp fragments of cytochrome b for Gadiformes and Pleuronectiformes. Statistical results confirmed significant differences between the tested methods according to yield, efficiency and purity and no significant differences with respect to the species employed. The best yields were obtained with the Wizard kit, whereas other methods stand out in terms of their affordability (Chelex) and automation (Mpure).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9222224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92222242022-06-24 The Influence of DNA Extraction Methods on Species Identification Results of Seafood Products Rodríguez-Riveiro, Rosalía Velasco, Amaya Sotelo, Carmen G. Foods Article In terms of species identification, the ultimate aim of extracting DNA is the subsequent amplification of the selected marker; therefore, the quality and quantity of the extracted DNA must be sufficient for PCR-based methods. The purpose of this study is to compare five DNA extraction methods according to the parameters of quantity, quality and simplicity, among others, in order to determine the most suitable method for identification for Cephalopoda, Gadiformes and Pleuronectiformes. The Wizard DNA clean-up system kit (Promega), MPure-12(TM) automated nucleic acid purification system (MP Biomedicals), Chelex 100 resin (Biorad), DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen) and a swab method were examined. The obtained DNA quantity was determined by fluorescence, and quality was evaluated with ratios of absorbance of A260/A280 and A260/A230 by agarose gel visualization of the extracts and by analyzing the success of PCR amplifications of 720 bp fragments of cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) for Cephalopods and 465 bp fragments of cytochrome b for Gadiformes and Pleuronectiformes. Statistical results confirmed significant differences between the tested methods according to yield, efficiency and purity and no significant differences with respect to the species employed. The best yields were obtained with the Wizard kit, whereas other methods stand out in terms of their affordability (Chelex) and automation (Mpure). MDPI 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9222224/ /pubmed/35741937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11121739 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rodríguez-Riveiro, Rosalía
Velasco, Amaya
Sotelo, Carmen G.
The Influence of DNA Extraction Methods on Species Identification Results of Seafood Products
title The Influence of DNA Extraction Methods on Species Identification Results of Seafood Products
title_full The Influence of DNA Extraction Methods on Species Identification Results of Seafood Products
title_fullStr The Influence of DNA Extraction Methods on Species Identification Results of Seafood Products
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of DNA Extraction Methods on Species Identification Results of Seafood Products
title_short The Influence of DNA Extraction Methods on Species Identification Results of Seafood Products
title_sort influence of dna extraction methods on species identification results of seafood products
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35741937
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11121739
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezriveirorosalia theinfluenceofdnaextractionmethodsonspeciesidentificationresultsofseafoodproducts
AT velascoamaya theinfluenceofdnaextractionmethodsonspeciesidentificationresultsofseafoodproducts
AT sotelocarmeng theinfluenceofdnaextractionmethodsonspeciesidentificationresultsofseafoodproducts
AT rodriguezriveirorosalia influenceofdnaextractionmethodsonspeciesidentificationresultsofseafoodproducts
AT velascoamaya influenceofdnaextractionmethodsonspeciesidentificationresultsofseafoodproducts
AT sotelocarmeng influenceofdnaextractionmethodsonspeciesidentificationresultsofseafoodproducts