Cargando…
Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients
In this study, effects of smoking on colour vision with the Farnsworth–Munsell 100 Hue test (FM100h) and achromatic (A), red-green (RG), and blue-yellow (BY) contrast sensitivity functions were evaluated. In total, 50 non-smoker controls and 25 smokers, divided into two groups (group 1, less than 10...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19126991 |
_version_ | 1784732916915372032 |
---|---|
author | García-Domene, Mari Carmen Luque-Cobija, María Josefa de Fez, Dolores Díez-Ajenjo, María Amparo |
author_facet | García-Domene, Mari Carmen Luque-Cobija, María Josefa de Fez, Dolores Díez-Ajenjo, María Amparo |
author_sort | García-Domene, Mari Carmen |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, effects of smoking on colour vision with the Farnsworth–Munsell 100 Hue test (FM100h) and achromatic (A), red-green (RG), and blue-yellow (BY) contrast sensitivity functions were evaluated. In total, 50 non-smoker controls and 25 smokers, divided into two groups (group 1, less than 10 cigarettes per day, with 15 patients, and group 2, >10 cigarettes per day, with 10 patients) took part in the experiments. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), FM100h, and A, RG, and BY contrast sensitivity functions were measured. Total and partial RG and BY error scores (TES and PTES) and colour axis index (CA) were used in the analysis. No differences between smoker and non-smoker groups were found in BCVA, CA and A and BY contrast sensitivity, but TES and PTES values and RG contrast sensitivity at 1 cpd were statistically different. Differences between smoker groups were not significant. Error scores in smokers were positively correlated with the number of cigarettes smoked per day, and in BY also with age. Tobacco caused discrimination losses in both chromatic mechanisms but affected the red-green pathway more than the blue-yellow, and therefore, a partial RG score of FM100h test seems to be a good predictor of smoker colour deficiencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9222644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92226442022-06-24 Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients García-Domene, Mari Carmen Luque-Cobija, María Josefa de Fez, Dolores Díez-Ajenjo, María Amparo Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In this study, effects of smoking on colour vision with the Farnsworth–Munsell 100 Hue test (FM100h) and achromatic (A), red-green (RG), and blue-yellow (BY) contrast sensitivity functions were evaluated. In total, 50 non-smoker controls and 25 smokers, divided into two groups (group 1, less than 10 cigarettes per day, with 15 patients, and group 2, >10 cigarettes per day, with 10 patients) took part in the experiments. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), FM100h, and A, RG, and BY contrast sensitivity functions were measured. Total and partial RG and BY error scores (TES and PTES) and colour axis index (CA) were used in the analysis. No differences between smoker and non-smoker groups were found in BCVA, CA and A and BY contrast sensitivity, but TES and PTES values and RG contrast sensitivity at 1 cpd were statistically different. Differences between smoker groups were not significant. Error scores in smokers were positively correlated with the number of cigarettes smoked per day, and in BY also with age. Tobacco caused discrimination losses in both chromatic mechanisms but affected the red-green pathway more than the blue-yellow, and therefore, a partial RG score of FM100h test seems to be a good predictor of smoker colour deficiencies. MDPI 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9222644/ /pubmed/35742240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19126991 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article García-Domene, Mari Carmen Luque-Cobija, María Josefa de Fez, Dolores Díez-Ajenjo, María Amparo Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients |
title | Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients |
title_full | Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients |
title_fullStr | Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients |
title_short | Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients |
title_sort | chromatic contrast sensitivity functions and colour discrimination in smoker patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19126991 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciadomenemaricarmen chromaticcontrastsensitivityfunctionsandcolourdiscriminationinsmokerpatients AT luquecobijamariajosefa chromaticcontrastsensitivityfunctionsandcolourdiscriminationinsmokerpatients AT defezdolores chromaticcontrastsensitivityfunctionsandcolourdiscriminationinsmokerpatients AT diezajenjomariaamparo chromaticcontrastsensitivityfunctionsandcolourdiscriminationinsmokerpatients |