Cargando…

Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients

In this study, effects of smoking on colour vision with the Farnsworth–Munsell 100 Hue test (FM100h) and achromatic (A), red-green (RG), and blue-yellow (BY) contrast sensitivity functions were evaluated. In total, 50 non-smoker controls and 25 smokers, divided into two groups (group 1, less than 10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-Domene, Mari Carmen, Luque-Cobija, María Josefa, de Fez, Dolores, Díez-Ajenjo, María Amparo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742240
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19126991
_version_ 1784732916915372032
author García-Domene, Mari Carmen
Luque-Cobija, María Josefa
de Fez, Dolores
Díez-Ajenjo, María Amparo
author_facet García-Domene, Mari Carmen
Luque-Cobija, María Josefa
de Fez, Dolores
Díez-Ajenjo, María Amparo
author_sort García-Domene, Mari Carmen
collection PubMed
description In this study, effects of smoking on colour vision with the Farnsworth–Munsell 100 Hue test (FM100h) and achromatic (A), red-green (RG), and blue-yellow (BY) contrast sensitivity functions were evaluated. In total, 50 non-smoker controls and 25 smokers, divided into two groups (group 1, less than 10 cigarettes per day, with 15 patients, and group 2, >10 cigarettes per day, with 10 patients) took part in the experiments. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), FM100h, and A, RG, and BY contrast sensitivity functions were measured. Total and partial RG and BY error scores (TES and PTES) and colour axis index (CA) were used in the analysis. No differences between smoker and non-smoker groups were found in BCVA, CA and A and BY contrast sensitivity, but TES and PTES values and RG contrast sensitivity at 1 cpd were statistically different. Differences between smoker groups were not significant. Error scores in smokers were positively correlated with the number of cigarettes smoked per day, and in BY also with age. Tobacco caused discrimination losses in both chromatic mechanisms but affected the red-green pathway more than the blue-yellow, and therefore, a partial RG score of FM100h test seems to be a good predictor of smoker colour deficiencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9222644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92226442022-06-24 Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients García-Domene, Mari Carmen Luque-Cobija, María Josefa de Fez, Dolores Díez-Ajenjo, María Amparo Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In this study, effects of smoking on colour vision with the Farnsworth–Munsell 100 Hue test (FM100h) and achromatic (A), red-green (RG), and blue-yellow (BY) contrast sensitivity functions were evaluated. In total, 50 non-smoker controls and 25 smokers, divided into two groups (group 1, less than 10 cigarettes per day, with 15 patients, and group 2, >10 cigarettes per day, with 10 patients) took part in the experiments. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), FM100h, and A, RG, and BY contrast sensitivity functions were measured. Total and partial RG and BY error scores (TES and PTES) and colour axis index (CA) were used in the analysis. No differences between smoker and non-smoker groups were found in BCVA, CA and A and BY contrast sensitivity, but TES and PTES values and RG contrast sensitivity at 1 cpd were statistically different. Differences between smoker groups were not significant. Error scores in smokers were positively correlated with the number of cigarettes smoked per day, and in BY also with age. Tobacco caused discrimination losses in both chromatic mechanisms but affected the red-green pathway more than the blue-yellow, and therefore, a partial RG score of FM100h test seems to be a good predictor of smoker colour deficiencies. MDPI 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9222644/ /pubmed/35742240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19126991 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
García-Domene, Mari Carmen
Luque-Cobija, María Josefa
de Fez, Dolores
Díez-Ajenjo, María Amparo
Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients
title Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients
title_full Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients
title_fullStr Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients
title_full_unstemmed Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients
title_short Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Functions and Colour Discrimination in Smoker Patients
title_sort chromatic contrast sensitivity functions and colour discrimination in smoker patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742240
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19126991
work_keys_str_mv AT garciadomenemaricarmen chromaticcontrastsensitivityfunctionsandcolourdiscriminationinsmokerpatients
AT luquecobijamariajosefa chromaticcontrastsensitivityfunctionsandcolourdiscriminationinsmokerpatients
AT defezdolores chromaticcontrastsensitivityfunctionsandcolourdiscriminationinsmokerpatients
AT diezajenjomariaamparo chromaticcontrastsensitivityfunctionsandcolourdiscriminationinsmokerpatients