Cargando…

Income Disparities in Obesity Trends among U.S. Adults: An Analysis of the 2011–2014 California Health Interview Survey

The aim of this study was to examine income disparities in obesity trends among California adults. Data were obtained from the 2011–2014 California Health Interview Survey (n = 83,175 adults). Obesity for adults was defined as a body mass index of 30 kg/m(2) or above. Family income was categorized a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gong, Shaoqing, Wang, Liang, Zhou, Zhongliang, Wang, Kesheng, Alamian, Arsham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742437
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127188
_version_ 1784732963378823168
author Gong, Shaoqing
Wang, Liang
Zhou, Zhongliang
Wang, Kesheng
Alamian, Arsham
author_facet Gong, Shaoqing
Wang, Liang
Zhou, Zhongliang
Wang, Kesheng
Alamian, Arsham
author_sort Gong, Shaoqing
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to examine income disparities in obesity trends among California adults. Data were obtained from the 2011–2014 California Health Interview Survey (n = 83,175 adults). Obesity for adults was defined as a body mass index of 30 kg/m(2) or above. Family income was categorized as below 100%, 100% to 299%, or 300% and above of the federal poverty level (FPL). Weighted multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between family income and obesity across survey years after controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking status, marital status, education, physical activity, and healthy diet. Obesity prevalence among California adults increased slightly from 25.1% in 2011 to 27.0% in 2014. Compared to 300% FPL or above, <100% FPL and 100–299% FPL were associated with increased odds of obesity, respectively (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.22–1.50, for 100–299% FPL; OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.10–1.27, for 300% FPL or above). Each year, lower FPL was associated with higher odds of obesity, except for the year 2014. An inverse association between obesity and family income in each survey year was observed, with the magnitude of the income disparity decreasing from 2011 to 2014. The findings of this study show that family income was negatively associated with obesity among adults in California from 2011–2014, and the magnitude of the income disparity in obesity prevalence decreased over this period. Future studies need to examine potential risk factors associated with the decreasing trend.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9222810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92228102022-06-24 Income Disparities in Obesity Trends among U.S. Adults: An Analysis of the 2011–2014 California Health Interview Survey Gong, Shaoqing Wang, Liang Zhou, Zhongliang Wang, Kesheng Alamian, Arsham Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The aim of this study was to examine income disparities in obesity trends among California adults. Data were obtained from the 2011–2014 California Health Interview Survey (n = 83,175 adults). Obesity for adults was defined as a body mass index of 30 kg/m(2) or above. Family income was categorized as below 100%, 100% to 299%, or 300% and above of the federal poverty level (FPL). Weighted multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between family income and obesity across survey years after controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking status, marital status, education, physical activity, and healthy diet. Obesity prevalence among California adults increased slightly from 25.1% in 2011 to 27.0% in 2014. Compared to 300% FPL or above, <100% FPL and 100–299% FPL were associated with increased odds of obesity, respectively (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.22–1.50, for 100–299% FPL; OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.10–1.27, for 300% FPL or above). Each year, lower FPL was associated with higher odds of obesity, except for the year 2014. An inverse association between obesity and family income in each survey year was observed, with the magnitude of the income disparity decreasing from 2011 to 2014. The findings of this study show that family income was negatively associated with obesity among adults in California from 2011–2014, and the magnitude of the income disparity in obesity prevalence decreased over this period. Future studies need to examine potential risk factors associated with the decreasing trend. MDPI 2022-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9222810/ /pubmed/35742437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127188 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gong, Shaoqing
Wang, Liang
Zhou, Zhongliang
Wang, Kesheng
Alamian, Arsham
Income Disparities in Obesity Trends among U.S. Adults: An Analysis of the 2011–2014 California Health Interview Survey
title Income Disparities in Obesity Trends among U.S. Adults: An Analysis of the 2011–2014 California Health Interview Survey
title_full Income Disparities in Obesity Trends among U.S. Adults: An Analysis of the 2011–2014 California Health Interview Survey
title_fullStr Income Disparities in Obesity Trends among U.S. Adults: An Analysis of the 2011–2014 California Health Interview Survey
title_full_unstemmed Income Disparities in Obesity Trends among U.S. Adults: An Analysis of the 2011–2014 California Health Interview Survey
title_short Income Disparities in Obesity Trends among U.S. Adults: An Analysis of the 2011–2014 California Health Interview Survey
title_sort income disparities in obesity trends among u.s. adults: an analysis of the 2011–2014 california health interview survey
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742437
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127188
work_keys_str_mv AT gongshaoqing incomedisparitiesinobesitytrendsamongusadultsananalysisofthe20112014californiahealthinterviewsurvey
AT wangliang incomedisparitiesinobesitytrendsamongusadultsananalysisofthe20112014californiahealthinterviewsurvey
AT zhouzhongliang incomedisparitiesinobesitytrendsamongusadultsananalysisofthe20112014californiahealthinterviewsurvey
AT wangkesheng incomedisparitiesinobesitytrendsamongusadultsananalysisofthe20112014californiahealthinterviewsurvey
AT alamianarsham incomedisparitiesinobesitytrendsamongusadultsananalysisofthe20112014californiahealthinterviewsurvey