Cargando…

Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Preoperative Setting: A Narrative Review

Cognitive impairment predisposes patients to the development of delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. In particular, in older patients, the adverse sequelae of cognitive decline in the perioperative period may contribute to adverse outcomes after surgical procedures. Subtle signs of cogn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: te Pas, Mariska, Olde Rikkert, Marcel, Bouwman, Arthur, Kessels, Roy, Buise, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061112
_version_ 1784733031459717120
author te Pas, Mariska
Olde Rikkert, Marcel
Bouwman, Arthur
Kessels, Roy
Buise, Marc
author_facet te Pas, Mariska
Olde Rikkert, Marcel
Bouwman, Arthur
Kessels, Roy
Buise, Marc
author_sort te Pas, Mariska
collection PubMed
description Cognitive impairment predisposes patients to the development of delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. In particular, in older patients, the adverse sequelae of cognitive decline in the perioperative period may contribute to adverse outcomes after surgical procedures. Subtle signs of cognitive impairment are often not previously diagnosed. Therefore, the aim of this review is to describe the available cognitive screeners suitable for preoperative screening and their psychometric properties for identifying mild cognitive impairment, as preoperative workup may improve perioperative care for patients at risk for postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Electronic systematic and snowball searches of PubMed, PsycInfo, ClinicalKey, and ScienceDirect were conducted for the period 2015–2020. Major inclusion criteria for articles included those that discussed a screener that included the cognitive domain ‘memory’, that had a duration time of less than 15 min, and that reported sensitivity and specificity to detect mild cognitive impairment. Studies about informant-based screeners were excluded. We provided an overview of the characteristics of the cognitive screener, such as interrater and test-retest reliability correlations, sensitivity and specificity for mild cognitive impairment and cognitive impairment, and duration of the screener and cutoff points. Of the 4775 identified titles, 3222 were excluded from further analysis because they were published prior to 2015. One thousand four hundred and forty-eight titles did not fulfill the inclusion criteria. All abstracts of 52 studies on 45 screeners were examined of which 10 met the inclusion criteria. For these 10 screeners, a further snowball search was performed to obtain related studies, resulting in 20 articles. Screeners included in this review were the Mini-Cog, MoCA, O3DY, AD8, SAGE, SLUMS, TICS(-M), QMCI, MMSE2, and Mini-ACE. The sensitivity and specificity range to detect MCI in an older population is the highest for the MoCA, with a sensitivity range of 81–93% and a specificity range of 74–89%. The MoCA, with the highest combination of sensitivity and specificity, is a feasible and valid routine screening of pre-surgical cognitive function. This warrants further implementation and validation studies in surgical pathways with a large proportion of older patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9223065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92230652022-06-24 Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Preoperative Setting: A Narrative Review te Pas, Mariska Olde Rikkert, Marcel Bouwman, Arthur Kessels, Roy Buise, Marc Healthcare (Basel) Review Cognitive impairment predisposes patients to the development of delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. In particular, in older patients, the adverse sequelae of cognitive decline in the perioperative period may contribute to adverse outcomes after surgical procedures. Subtle signs of cognitive impairment are often not previously diagnosed. Therefore, the aim of this review is to describe the available cognitive screeners suitable for preoperative screening and their psychometric properties for identifying mild cognitive impairment, as preoperative workup may improve perioperative care for patients at risk for postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Electronic systematic and snowball searches of PubMed, PsycInfo, ClinicalKey, and ScienceDirect were conducted for the period 2015–2020. Major inclusion criteria for articles included those that discussed a screener that included the cognitive domain ‘memory’, that had a duration time of less than 15 min, and that reported sensitivity and specificity to detect mild cognitive impairment. Studies about informant-based screeners were excluded. We provided an overview of the characteristics of the cognitive screener, such as interrater and test-retest reliability correlations, sensitivity and specificity for mild cognitive impairment and cognitive impairment, and duration of the screener and cutoff points. Of the 4775 identified titles, 3222 were excluded from further analysis because they were published prior to 2015. One thousand four hundred and forty-eight titles did not fulfill the inclusion criteria. All abstracts of 52 studies on 45 screeners were examined of which 10 met the inclusion criteria. For these 10 screeners, a further snowball search was performed to obtain related studies, resulting in 20 articles. Screeners included in this review were the Mini-Cog, MoCA, O3DY, AD8, SAGE, SLUMS, TICS(-M), QMCI, MMSE2, and Mini-ACE. The sensitivity and specificity range to detect MCI in an older population is the highest for the MoCA, with a sensitivity range of 81–93% and a specificity range of 74–89%. The MoCA, with the highest combination of sensitivity and specificity, is a feasible and valid routine screening of pre-surgical cognitive function. This warrants further implementation and validation studies in surgical pathways with a large proportion of older patients. MDPI 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9223065/ /pubmed/35742163 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061112 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
te Pas, Mariska
Olde Rikkert, Marcel
Bouwman, Arthur
Kessels, Roy
Buise, Marc
Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Preoperative Setting: A Narrative Review
title Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Preoperative Setting: A Narrative Review
title_full Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Preoperative Setting: A Narrative Review
title_fullStr Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Preoperative Setting: A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Preoperative Setting: A Narrative Review
title_short Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Preoperative Setting: A Narrative Review
title_sort screening for mild cognitive impairment in the preoperative setting: a narrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061112
work_keys_str_mv AT tepasmariska screeningformildcognitiveimpairmentinthepreoperativesettinganarrativereview
AT olderikkertmarcel screeningformildcognitiveimpairmentinthepreoperativesettinganarrativereview
AT bouwmanarthur screeningformildcognitiveimpairmentinthepreoperativesettinganarrativereview
AT kesselsroy screeningformildcognitiveimpairmentinthepreoperativesettinganarrativereview
AT buisemarc screeningformildcognitiveimpairmentinthepreoperativesettinganarrativereview