Cargando…

Social Media Impact of Myopia Research

Background: Myopia has become a public health issue worldwide. The fast increase in myopia prevalence in the last years has been accompanied by an increase in information through social and conventional media. This has led to the fight not only against a pandemic but also against the infodemic. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alvarez-Peregrina, Cristina, Villa-Collar, Cesar, Martinez-Perez, Clara, Barbosa, María Ibeth Peñaloza, Sánchez-Tena, Miguel Ángel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127270
_version_ 1784733038305869824
author Alvarez-Peregrina, Cristina
Villa-Collar, Cesar
Martinez-Perez, Clara
Barbosa, María Ibeth Peñaloza
Sánchez-Tena, Miguel Ángel
author_facet Alvarez-Peregrina, Cristina
Villa-Collar, Cesar
Martinez-Perez, Clara
Barbosa, María Ibeth Peñaloza
Sánchez-Tena, Miguel Ángel
author_sort Alvarez-Peregrina, Cristina
collection PubMed
description Background: Myopia has become a public health issue worldwide. The fast increase in myopia prevalence in the last years has been accompanied by an increase in information through social and conventional media. This has led to the fight not only against a pandemic but also against the infodemic. The excess of information has made it increasingly difficult for health professionals to identify high-quality articles. Alternative Metrics are useful tools to identify publications that provoke attention to society. This research aims to study the impact that research on myopia has had on social media. Methods: Almetric Explorer was used to make a search using “myopia” as a keyword. The 100 outputs with the highest attention were analyzed and correlated with the number of cites on Web of Science using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Results: The top 100 Altmetric Attention Score were published in 47 journals and had a mean value of Altmetric Attention Score of 437.61 ± 718.33. The outputs were mostly discussed on Twitter, with a mean of 296.36 ± 1585.58 tweets and retweets, and a mean of 185.18 ± 211.57 readers in Mendeley. There was a low correlation between Altmetric Attention Score and Web of Science Cites for the top-100 outputs. Conclusions: although myopia is a research topic with a high interest in society, most cited articles are not those with the most impact on social media. Myopia researchers should make more effort in promoting their goals, and social media is a useful tool to share them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9223093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92230932022-06-24 Social Media Impact of Myopia Research Alvarez-Peregrina, Cristina Villa-Collar, Cesar Martinez-Perez, Clara Barbosa, María Ibeth Peñaloza Sánchez-Tena, Miguel Ángel Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Myopia has become a public health issue worldwide. The fast increase in myopia prevalence in the last years has been accompanied by an increase in information through social and conventional media. This has led to the fight not only against a pandemic but also against the infodemic. The excess of information has made it increasingly difficult for health professionals to identify high-quality articles. Alternative Metrics are useful tools to identify publications that provoke attention to society. This research aims to study the impact that research on myopia has had on social media. Methods: Almetric Explorer was used to make a search using “myopia” as a keyword. The 100 outputs with the highest attention were analyzed and correlated with the number of cites on Web of Science using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Results: The top 100 Altmetric Attention Score were published in 47 journals and had a mean value of Altmetric Attention Score of 437.61 ± 718.33. The outputs were mostly discussed on Twitter, with a mean of 296.36 ± 1585.58 tweets and retweets, and a mean of 185.18 ± 211.57 readers in Mendeley. There was a low correlation between Altmetric Attention Score and Web of Science Cites for the top-100 outputs. Conclusions: although myopia is a research topic with a high interest in society, most cited articles are not those with the most impact on social media. Myopia researchers should make more effort in promoting their goals, and social media is a useful tool to share them. MDPI 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9223093/ /pubmed/35742519 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127270 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alvarez-Peregrina, Cristina
Villa-Collar, Cesar
Martinez-Perez, Clara
Barbosa, María Ibeth Peñaloza
Sánchez-Tena, Miguel Ángel
Social Media Impact of Myopia Research
title Social Media Impact of Myopia Research
title_full Social Media Impact of Myopia Research
title_fullStr Social Media Impact of Myopia Research
title_full_unstemmed Social Media Impact of Myopia Research
title_short Social Media Impact of Myopia Research
title_sort social media impact of myopia research
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127270
work_keys_str_mv AT alvarezperegrinacristina socialmediaimpactofmyopiaresearch
AT villacollarcesar socialmediaimpactofmyopiaresearch
AT martinezperezclara socialmediaimpactofmyopiaresearch
AT barbosamariaibethpenaloza socialmediaimpactofmyopiaresearch
AT sancheztenamiguelangel socialmediaimpactofmyopiaresearch