Cargando…
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale
This methodological study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale (HNCS), which comprises five dimensions and 36 items. The English version of the HNCS was forward and backward translated and administered to 251 participants with mo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127244 |
_version_ | 1784733079260102656 |
---|---|
author | Seo, Kawoun Jang, Taejeong Kim, Taehui |
author_facet | Seo, Kawoun Jang, Taejeong Kim, Taehui |
author_sort | Seo, Kawoun |
collection | PubMed |
description | This methodological study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale (HNCS), which comprises five dimensions and 36 items. The English version of the HNCS was forward and backward translated and administered to 251 participants with more than a year of work experience in a general hospital. Data were analyzed using SPSS WIN 24.0(Chicago, IL, USA), and AMOS program was used for confirmatory factor analysis. Additionally, the “Task Performance Evaluation Instrument for Clinical Nurses” was used for concurrent validity. Reliability assessed using Cronbach’s α was 0.969. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity were good. Average variance extracted and construct reliability ranged from 0.845 to 0.932 and 0.980 to 0.987, respectively. The model was suitable with the chi-square value being 1216.563 (df = 584, p < 0.001), and Q value being less than three. Goodness-of-fit index, root mean square residual, and root mean square error of approximation were 0.784, 0.066, and 0.066, respectively. Moreover, comparative fit index, Tucker–Lewis index, and incremental fit index were 0.913, 0.906, and 0.913, respectively. Thus, this study verified the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the HNCS. Our findings suggest that the scale is helpful in measuring and developing the holistic nursing competence of clinical nurses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9223244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92232442022-06-24 Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale Seo, Kawoun Jang, Taejeong Kim, Taehui Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This methodological study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale (HNCS), which comprises five dimensions and 36 items. The English version of the HNCS was forward and backward translated and administered to 251 participants with more than a year of work experience in a general hospital. Data were analyzed using SPSS WIN 24.0(Chicago, IL, USA), and AMOS program was used for confirmatory factor analysis. Additionally, the “Task Performance Evaluation Instrument for Clinical Nurses” was used for concurrent validity. Reliability assessed using Cronbach’s α was 0.969. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity were good. Average variance extracted and construct reliability ranged from 0.845 to 0.932 and 0.980 to 0.987, respectively. The model was suitable with the chi-square value being 1216.563 (df = 584, p < 0.001), and Q value being less than three. Goodness-of-fit index, root mean square residual, and root mean square error of approximation were 0.784, 0.066, and 0.066, respectively. Moreover, comparative fit index, Tucker–Lewis index, and incremental fit index were 0.913, 0.906, and 0.913, respectively. Thus, this study verified the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the HNCS. Our findings suggest that the scale is helpful in measuring and developing the holistic nursing competence of clinical nurses. MDPI 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9223244/ /pubmed/35742493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127244 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Seo, Kawoun Jang, Taejeong Kim, Taehui Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale |
title | Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale |
title_full | Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale |
title_fullStr | Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale |
title_short | Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale |
title_sort | validity and reliability of the korean version of the holistic nursing competence scale |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127244 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seokawoun validityandreliabilityofthekoreanversionoftheholisticnursingcompetencescale AT jangtaejeong validityandreliabilityofthekoreanversionoftheholisticnursingcompetencescale AT kimtaehui validityandreliabilityofthekoreanversionoftheholisticnursingcompetencescale |