Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale

This methodological study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale (HNCS), which comprises five dimensions and 36 items. The English version of the HNCS was forward and backward translated and administered to 251 participants with mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Kawoun, Jang, Taejeong, Kim, Taehui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742493
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127244
_version_ 1784733079260102656
author Seo, Kawoun
Jang, Taejeong
Kim, Taehui
author_facet Seo, Kawoun
Jang, Taejeong
Kim, Taehui
author_sort Seo, Kawoun
collection PubMed
description This methodological study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale (HNCS), which comprises five dimensions and 36 items. The English version of the HNCS was forward and backward translated and administered to 251 participants with more than a year of work experience in a general hospital. Data were analyzed using SPSS WIN 24.0(Chicago, IL, USA), and AMOS program was used for confirmatory factor analysis. Additionally, the “Task Performance Evaluation Instrument for Clinical Nurses” was used for concurrent validity. Reliability assessed using Cronbach’s α was 0.969. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity were good. Average variance extracted and construct reliability ranged from 0.845 to 0.932 and 0.980 to 0.987, respectively. The model was suitable with the chi-square value being 1216.563 (df = 584, p < 0.001), and Q value being less than three. Goodness-of-fit index, root mean square residual, and root mean square error of approximation were 0.784, 0.066, and 0.066, respectively. Moreover, comparative fit index, Tucker–Lewis index, and incremental fit index were 0.913, 0.906, and 0.913, respectively. Thus, this study verified the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the HNCS. Our findings suggest that the scale is helpful in measuring and developing the holistic nursing competence of clinical nurses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9223244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92232442022-06-24 Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale Seo, Kawoun Jang, Taejeong Kim, Taehui Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This methodological study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale (HNCS), which comprises five dimensions and 36 items. The English version of the HNCS was forward and backward translated and administered to 251 participants with more than a year of work experience in a general hospital. Data were analyzed using SPSS WIN 24.0(Chicago, IL, USA), and AMOS program was used for confirmatory factor analysis. Additionally, the “Task Performance Evaluation Instrument for Clinical Nurses” was used for concurrent validity. Reliability assessed using Cronbach’s α was 0.969. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity were good. Average variance extracted and construct reliability ranged from 0.845 to 0.932 and 0.980 to 0.987, respectively. The model was suitable with the chi-square value being 1216.563 (df = 584, p < 0.001), and Q value being less than three. Goodness-of-fit index, root mean square residual, and root mean square error of approximation were 0.784, 0.066, and 0.066, respectively. Moreover, comparative fit index, Tucker–Lewis index, and incremental fit index were 0.913, 0.906, and 0.913, respectively. Thus, this study verified the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the HNCS. Our findings suggest that the scale is helpful in measuring and developing the holistic nursing competence of clinical nurses. MDPI 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9223244/ /pubmed/35742493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127244 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Seo, Kawoun
Jang, Taejeong
Kim, Taehui
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale
title Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale
title_full Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale
title_short Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale
title_sort validity and reliability of the korean version of the holistic nursing competence scale
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742493
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127244
work_keys_str_mv AT seokawoun validityandreliabilityofthekoreanversionoftheholisticnursingcompetencescale
AT jangtaejeong validityandreliabilityofthekoreanversionoftheholisticnursingcompetencescale
AT kimtaehui validityandreliabilityofthekoreanversionoftheholisticnursingcompetencescale