Cargando…
Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists
Communication is a fundamental part of scientific development and methodology. With the advancement of the internet and social networks, communication has become rapid and sometimes overwhelming, especially in science. It is important to provide scientists with useful, effective, and dynamic tools t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35737640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010130 |
_version_ | 1784733096857305088 |
---|---|
author | Bautista, Carla Alfuraiji, Narjes Drangowska-Way, Anna Gangwani, Karishma de Flamingh, Alida Bourne, Philip E. |
author_facet | Bautista, Carla Alfuraiji, Narjes Drangowska-Way, Anna Gangwani, Karishma de Flamingh, Alida Bourne, Philip E. |
author_sort | Bautista, Carla |
collection | PubMed |
description | Communication is a fundamental part of scientific development and methodology. With the advancement of the internet and social networks, communication has become rapid and sometimes overwhelming, especially in science. It is important to provide scientists with useful, effective, and dynamic tools to establish and build a fluid communication framework that allows for scientific advancement. Therefore, in this article, we present advice and recommendations that can help promote and improve science communication while respecting an adequate balance in the degree of commitment toward collaborative work. We have developed 10 rules shown in increasing order of commitment that are grouped into 3 key categories: (1) speak (based on active participation); (2) join (based on joining scientific groups); and (3) assess (based on the analysis and retrospective consideration of the weaknesses and strengths). We include examples and resources that provide actionable strategies for involvement and engagement with science communication, from basic steps to more advanced, introspective, and long-term commitments. Overall, we aim to help spread science from within and encourage and engage scientists to become involved in science communication effectively and dynamically. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9223317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92233172022-06-24 Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists Bautista, Carla Alfuraiji, Narjes Drangowska-Way, Anna Gangwani, Karishma de Flamingh, Alida Bourne, Philip E. PLoS Comput Biol Perspective Communication is a fundamental part of scientific development and methodology. With the advancement of the internet and social networks, communication has become rapid and sometimes overwhelming, especially in science. It is important to provide scientists with useful, effective, and dynamic tools to establish and build a fluid communication framework that allows for scientific advancement. Therefore, in this article, we present advice and recommendations that can help promote and improve science communication while respecting an adequate balance in the degree of commitment toward collaborative work. We have developed 10 rules shown in increasing order of commitment that are grouped into 3 key categories: (1) speak (based on active participation); (2) join (based on joining scientific groups); and (3) assess (based on the analysis and retrospective consideration of the weaknesses and strengths). We include examples and resources that provide actionable strategies for involvement and engagement with science communication, from basic steps to more advanced, introspective, and long-term commitments. Overall, we aim to help spread science from within and encourage and engage scientists to become involved in science communication effectively and dynamically. Public Library of Science 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9223317/ /pubmed/35737640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010130 Text en © 2022 Bautista et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Perspective Bautista, Carla Alfuraiji, Narjes Drangowska-Way, Anna Gangwani, Karishma de Flamingh, Alida Bourne, Philip E. Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists |
title | Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists |
title_full | Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists |
title_fullStr | Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists |
title_full_unstemmed | Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists |
title_short | Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists |
title_sort | ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35737640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bautistacarla tensimplerulesforimprovingcommunicationamongscientists AT alfuraijinarjes tensimplerulesforimprovingcommunicationamongscientists AT drangowskawayanna tensimplerulesforimprovingcommunicationamongscientists AT gangwanikarishma tensimplerulesforimprovingcommunicationamongscientists AT deflaminghalida tensimplerulesforimprovingcommunicationamongscientists AT bournephilipe tensimplerulesforimprovingcommunicationamongscientists |