Cargando…

Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists

Communication is a fundamental part of scientific development and methodology. With the advancement of the internet and social networks, communication has become rapid and sometimes overwhelming, especially in science. It is important to provide scientists with useful, effective, and dynamic tools t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bautista, Carla, Alfuraiji, Narjes, Drangowska-Way, Anna, Gangwani, Karishma, de Flamingh, Alida, Bourne, Philip E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35737640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010130
_version_ 1784733096857305088
author Bautista, Carla
Alfuraiji, Narjes
Drangowska-Way, Anna
Gangwani, Karishma
de Flamingh, Alida
Bourne, Philip E.
author_facet Bautista, Carla
Alfuraiji, Narjes
Drangowska-Way, Anna
Gangwani, Karishma
de Flamingh, Alida
Bourne, Philip E.
author_sort Bautista, Carla
collection PubMed
description Communication is a fundamental part of scientific development and methodology. With the advancement of the internet and social networks, communication has become rapid and sometimes overwhelming, especially in science. It is important to provide scientists with useful, effective, and dynamic tools to establish and build a fluid communication framework that allows for scientific advancement. Therefore, in this article, we present advice and recommendations that can help promote and improve science communication while respecting an adequate balance in the degree of commitment toward collaborative work. We have developed 10 rules shown in increasing order of commitment that are grouped into 3 key categories: (1) speak (based on active participation); (2) join (based on joining scientific groups); and (3) assess (based on the analysis and retrospective consideration of the weaknesses and strengths). We include examples and resources that provide actionable strategies for involvement and engagement with science communication, from basic steps to more advanced, introspective, and long-term commitments. Overall, we aim to help spread science from within and encourage and engage scientists to become involved in science communication effectively and dynamically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9223317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92233172022-06-24 Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists Bautista, Carla Alfuraiji, Narjes Drangowska-Way, Anna Gangwani, Karishma de Flamingh, Alida Bourne, Philip E. PLoS Comput Biol Perspective Communication is a fundamental part of scientific development and methodology. With the advancement of the internet and social networks, communication has become rapid and sometimes overwhelming, especially in science. It is important to provide scientists with useful, effective, and dynamic tools to establish and build a fluid communication framework that allows for scientific advancement. Therefore, in this article, we present advice and recommendations that can help promote and improve science communication while respecting an adequate balance in the degree of commitment toward collaborative work. We have developed 10 rules shown in increasing order of commitment that are grouped into 3 key categories: (1) speak (based on active participation); (2) join (based on joining scientific groups); and (3) assess (based on the analysis and retrospective consideration of the weaknesses and strengths). We include examples and resources that provide actionable strategies for involvement and engagement with science communication, from basic steps to more advanced, introspective, and long-term commitments. Overall, we aim to help spread science from within and encourage and engage scientists to become involved in science communication effectively and dynamically. Public Library of Science 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9223317/ /pubmed/35737640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010130 Text en © 2022 Bautista et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Perspective
Bautista, Carla
Alfuraiji, Narjes
Drangowska-Way, Anna
Gangwani, Karishma
de Flamingh, Alida
Bourne, Philip E.
Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists
title Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists
title_full Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists
title_fullStr Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists
title_full_unstemmed Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists
title_short Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists
title_sort ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35737640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010130
work_keys_str_mv AT bautistacarla tensimplerulesforimprovingcommunicationamongscientists
AT alfuraijinarjes tensimplerulesforimprovingcommunicationamongscientists
AT drangowskawayanna tensimplerulesforimprovingcommunicationamongscientists
AT gangwanikarishma tensimplerulesforimprovingcommunicationamongscientists
AT deflaminghalida tensimplerulesforimprovingcommunicationamongscientists
AT bournephilipe tensimplerulesforimprovingcommunicationamongscientists