Cargando…

Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements

The emergence of low-cost air quality sensors as viable tools for the monitoring of air quality at population and individual levels necessitates the evaluation of these instruments. The Flow air quality tracker, a product of Plume Labs, is one such sensor. To evaluate these sensors, we assessed 34 o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crnosija, Natalie, Levy Zamora, Misti, Rule, Ana M., Payne-Sturges, Devon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742589
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127340
Descripción
Sumario:The emergence of low-cost air quality sensors as viable tools for the monitoring of air quality at population and individual levels necessitates the evaluation of these instruments. The Flow air quality tracker, a product of Plume Labs, is one such sensor. To evaluate these sensors, we assessed 34 of them in a controlled laboratory setting by exposing them to PM(10) and PM(2.5) and compared the response with Plantower A003 measurements. The overall coefficient of determination (R(2)) of measured PM(2.5) was 0.76 and of PM(10) it was 0.73, but the Flows’ accuracy improved after each introduction of incense. Overall, these findings suggest that the Flow can be a useful air quality monitoring tool in air pollution areas with higher concentrations, when incorporated into other monitoring frameworks and when used in aggregate. The broader environmental implications of this work are that it is possible for individuals and groups to monitor their individual exposure to particulate matter pollution.