Cargando…

Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements

The emergence of low-cost air quality sensors as viable tools for the monitoring of air quality at population and individual levels necessitates the evaluation of these instruments. The Flow air quality tracker, a product of Plume Labs, is one such sensor. To evaluate these sensors, we assessed 34 o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crnosija, Natalie, Levy Zamora, Misti, Rule, Ana M., Payne-Sturges, Devon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742589
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127340
_version_ 1784733162675372032
author Crnosija, Natalie
Levy Zamora, Misti
Rule, Ana M.
Payne-Sturges, Devon
author_facet Crnosija, Natalie
Levy Zamora, Misti
Rule, Ana M.
Payne-Sturges, Devon
author_sort Crnosija, Natalie
collection PubMed
description The emergence of low-cost air quality sensors as viable tools for the monitoring of air quality at population and individual levels necessitates the evaluation of these instruments. The Flow air quality tracker, a product of Plume Labs, is one such sensor. To evaluate these sensors, we assessed 34 of them in a controlled laboratory setting by exposing them to PM(10) and PM(2.5) and compared the response with Plantower A003 measurements. The overall coefficient of determination (R(2)) of measured PM(2.5) was 0.76 and of PM(10) it was 0.73, but the Flows’ accuracy improved after each introduction of incense. Overall, these findings suggest that the Flow can be a useful air quality monitoring tool in air pollution areas with higher concentrations, when incorporated into other monitoring frameworks and when used in aggregate. The broader environmental implications of this work are that it is possible for individuals and groups to monitor their individual exposure to particulate matter pollution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9223593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92235932022-06-24 Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements Crnosija, Natalie Levy Zamora, Misti Rule, Ana M. Payne-Sturges, Devon Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The emergence of low-cost air quality sensors as viable tools for the monitoring of air quality at population and individual levels necessitates the evaluation of these instruments. The Flow air quality tracker, a product of Plume Labs, is one such sensor. To evaluate these sensors, we assessed 34 of them in a controlled laboratory setting by exposing them to PM(10) and PM(2.5) and compared the response with Plantower A003 measurements. The overall coefficient of determination (R(2)) of measured PM(2.5) was 0.76 and of PM(10) it was 0.73, but the Flows’ accuracy improved after each introduction of incense. Overall, these findings suggest that the Flow can be a useful air quality monitoring tool in air pollution areas with higher concentrations, when incorporated into other monitoring frameworks and when used in aggregate. The broader environmental implications of this work are that it is possible for individuals and groups to monitor their individual exposure to particulate matter pollution. MDPI 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9223593/ /pubmed/35742589 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127340 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Crnosija, Natalie
Levy Zamora, Misti
Rule, Ana M.
Payne-Sturges, Devon
Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements
title Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements
title_full Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements
title_fullStr Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements
title_short Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements
title_sort laboratory chamber evaluation of flow air quality sensor pm(2.5) and pm(10) measurements
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742589
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127340
work_keys_str_mv AT crnosijanatalie laboratorychamberevaluationofflowairqualitysensorpm25andpm10measurements
AT levyzamoramisti laboratorychamberevaluationofflowairqualitysensorpm25andpm10measurements
AT ruleanam laboratorychamberevaluationofflowairqualitysensorpm25andpm10measurements
AT paynesturgesdevon laboratorychamberevaluationofflowairqualitysensorpm25andpm10measurements