Cargando…
Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements
The emergence of low-cost air quality sensors as viable tools for the monitoring of air quality at population and individual levels necessitates the evaluation of these instruments. The Flow air quality tracker, a product of Plume Labs, is one such sensor. To evaluate these sensors, we assessed 34 o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742589 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127340 |
_version_ | 1784733162675372032 |
---|---|
author | Crnosija, Natalie Levy Zamora, Misti Rule, Ana M. Payne-Sturges, Devon |
author_facet | Crnosija, Natalie Levy Zamora, Misti Rule, Ana M. Payne-Sturges, Devon |
author_sort | Crnosija, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The emergence of low-cost air quality sensors as viable tools for the monitoring of air quality at population and individual levels necessitates the evaluation of these instruments. The Flow air quality tracker, a product of Plume Labs, is one such sensor. To evaluate these sensors, we assessed 34 of them in a controlled laboratory setting by exposing them to PM(10) and PM(2.5) and compared the response with Plantower A003 measurements. The overall coefficient of determination (R(2)) of measured PM(2.5) was 0.76 and of PM(10) it was 0.73, but the Flows’ accuracy improved after each introduction of incense. Overall, these findings suggest that the Flow can be a useful air quality monitoring tool in air pollution areas with higher concentrations, when incorporated into other monitoring frameworks and when used in aggregate. The broader environmental implications of this work are that it is possible for individuals and groups to monitor their individual exposure to particulate matter pollution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9223593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92235932022-06-24 Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements Crnosija, Natalie Levy Zamora, Misti Rule, Ana M. Payne-Sturges, Devon Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The emergence of low-cost air quality sensors as viable tools for the monitoring of air quality at population and individual levels necessitates the evaluation of these instruments. The Flow air quality tracker, a product of Plume Labs, is one such sensor. To evaluate these sensors, we assessed 34 of them in a controlled laboratory setting by exposing them to PM(10) and PM(2.5) and compared the response with Plantower A003 measurements. The overall coefficient of determination (R(2)) of measured PM(2.5) was 0.76 and of PM(10) it was 0.73, but the Flows’ accuracy improved after each introduction of incense. Overall, these findings suggest that the Flow can be a useful air quality monitoring tool in air pollution areas with higher concentrations, when incorporated into other monitoring frameworks and when used in aggregate. The broader environmental implications of this work are that it is possible for individuals and groups to monitor their individual exposure to particulate matter pollution. MDPI 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9223593/ /pubmed/35742589 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127340 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Crnosija, Natalie Levy Zamora, Misti Rule, Ana M. Payne-Sturges, Devon Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements |
title | Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements |
title_full | Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements |
title_fullStr | Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements |
title_short | Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM(2.5) and PM(10) Measurements |
title_sort | laboratory chamber evaluation of flow air quality sensor pm(2.5) and pm(10) measurements |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742589 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127340 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crnosijanatalie laboratorychamberevaluationofflowairqualitysensorpm25andpm10measurements AT levyzamoramisti laboratorychamberevaluationofflowairqualitysensorpm25andpm10measurements AT ruleanam laboratorychamberevaluationofflowairqualitysensorpm25andpm10measurements AT paynesturgesdevon laboratorychamberevaluationofflowairqualitysensorpm25andpm10measurements |