Cargando…

Profiles of Wellbeing in Soft and Hard Mountain Hikers

The aim of the study was to analyze the wellbeing profiles in a group of Polish mountain hikers. The study involved 242 young people (M = 23.50; SD = 4.40) who completed various wellbeing scales: The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ), Meaning of Life Questionnaire (MLQ), Positive and Negative Aff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Próchniak, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127429
_version_ 1784733171106971648
author Próchniak, Piotr
author_facet Próchniak, Piotr
author_sort Próchniak, Piotr
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to analyze the wellbeing profiles in a group of Polish mountain hikers. The study involved 242 young people (M = 23.50; SD = 4.40) who completed various wellbeing scales: The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ), Meaning of Life Questionnaire (MLQ), Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), Time Satisfaction Scale (TSS), Hope Scale, General Self-Efficiency Scale, Ego Resiliency Scale, Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R), and Adventure-Seeking Behavior Scale. Cluster analyses revealed two types of mountain hikers: hard adventure hikers and soft adventure hikers, with different profiles of subjective wellbeing. Hard adventure hikers most often revealed high levels of life satisfaction, control of life, meaning of life, and positive emotions, along with low levels of negative emotions. Moreover, these hikers revealed high levels of satisfaction in various time perspectives (past, present, and future) and a high level of psychological capital. On the other hand, soft adventure hikers most often revealed an average level of satisfaction with life, control of life, and positive emotions, average satisfaction in the past and present time perspective, and average levels of psychological capital. Soft adventure hikers also revealed higher levels of negative emotions and satisfaction in the future time perspective. The present research indicated that mountain hikers are not a homogenous group. The profiles of wellbeing in the hikers varied depending on the type of stimulating behavior in a natural environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9223626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92236262022-06-24 Profiles of Wellbeing in Soft and Hard Mountain Hikers Próchniak, Piotr Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The aim of the study was to analyze the wellbeing profiles in a group of Polish mountain hikers. The study involved 242 young people (M = 23.50; SD = 4.40) who completed various wellbeing scales: The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ), Meaning of Life Questionnaire (MLQ), Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), Time Satisfaction Scale (TSS), Hope Scale, General Self-Efficiency Scale, Ego Resiliency Scale, Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R), and Adventure-Seeking Behavior Scale. Cluster analyses revealed two types of mountain hikers: hard adventure hikers and soft adventure hikers, with different profiles of subjective wellbeing. Hard adventure hikers most often revealed high levels of life satisfaction, control of life, meaning of life, and positive emotions, along with low levels of negative emotions. Moreover, these hikers revealed high levels of satisfaction in various time perspectives (past, present, and future) and a high level of psychological capital. On the other hand, soft adventure hikers most often revealed an average level of satisfaction with life, control of life, and positive emotions, average satisfaction in the past and present time perspective, and average levels of psychological capital. Soft adventure hikers also revealed higher levels of negative emotions and satisfaction in the future time perspective. The present research indicated that mountain hikers are not a homogenous group. The profiles of wellbeing in the hikers varied depending on the type of stimulating behavior in a natural environment. MDPI 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9223626/ /pubmed/35742678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127429 Text en © 2022 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Próchniak, Piotr
Profiles of Wellbeing in Soft and Hard Mountain Hikers
title Profiles of Wellbeing in Soft and Hard Mountain Hikers
title_full Profiles of Wellbeing in Soft and Hard Mountain Hikers
title_fullStr Profiles of Wellbeing in Soft and Hard Mountain Hikers
title_full_unstemmed Profiles of Wellbeing in Soft and Hard Mountain Hikers
title_short Profiles of Wellbeing in Soft and Hard Mountain Hikers
title_sort profiles of wellbeing in soft and hard mountain hikers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127429
work_keys_str_mv AT prochniakpiotr profilesofwellbeinginsoftandhardmountainhikers