Cargando…

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A reliable estimate of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies is increasingly important to track the spread of infection and define the true burden of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted with the objective of estimating the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hajissa, Khalid, Islam, Md Asiful, Hassan, Siti Asma, Zaidah, Abdul Rahman, Ismail, Nabilah, Mohamed, Zeehaida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127257
_version_ 1784733184731119616
author Hajissa, Khalid
Islam, Md Asiful
Hassan, Siti Asma
Zaidah, Abdul Rahman
Ismail, Nabilah
Mohamed, Zeehaida
author_facet Hajissa, Khalid
Islam, Md Asiful
Hassan, Siti Asma
Zaidah, Abdul Rahman
Ismail, Nabilah
Mohamed, Zeehaida
author_sort Hajissa, Khalid
collection PubMed
description A reliable estimate of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies is increasingly important to track the spread of infection and define the true burden of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted with the objective of estimating the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Africa. A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar electronic databases was conducted. Thirty-five eligible studies were included. Using meta-analysis of proportions, the overall seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was calculated as 16% (95% CI 13.1–18.9%). Based on antibody isotypes, 14.6% (95% CI 12.2–17.1%) and 11.5% (95% CI 8.7–14.2%) were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM, respectively, while 6.6% (95% CI 4.9–8.3%) were tested positive for both IgM and IgG. Healthcare workers (16.3%) had higher seroprevalence than the general population (11.7%), blood donors (7.5%) and pregnant women (5.7%). The finding of this systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) may not accurately reflect the true seroprevalence status of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Africa, hence, further seroprevalence studies across Africa are required to assess and monitor the growing COVID-19 burden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9223681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92236812022-06-24 Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hajissa, Khalid Islam, Md Asiful Hassan, Siti Asma Zaidah, Abdul Rahman Ismail, Nabilah Mohamed, Zeehaida Int J Environ Res Public Health Article A reliable estimate of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies is increasingly important to track the spread of infection and define the true burden of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted with the objective of estimating the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Africa. A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar electronic databases was conducted. Thirty-five eligible studies were included. Using meta-analysis of proportions, the overall seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was calculated as 16% (95% CI 13.1–18.9%). Based on antibody isotypes, 14.6% (95% CI 12.2–17.1%) and 11.5% (95% CI 8.7–14.2%) were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM, respectively, while 6.6% (95% CI 4.9–8.3%) were tested positive for both IgM and IgG. Healthcare workers (16.3%) had higher seroprevalence than the general population (11.7%), blood donors (7.5%) and pregnant women (5.7%). The finding of this systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) may not accurately reflect the true seroprevalence status of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Africa, hence, further seroprevalence studies across Africa are required to assess and monitor the growing COVID-19 burden. MDPI 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9223681/ /pubmed/35742506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127257 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hajissa, Khalid
Islam, Md Asiful
Hassan, Siti Asma
Zaidah, Abdul Rahman
Ismail, Nabilah
Mohamed, Zeehaida
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort seroprevalence of sars-cov-2 antibodies in africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127257
work_keys_str_mv AT hajissakhalid seroprevalenceofsarscov2antibodiesinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT islammdasiful seroprevalenceofsarscov2antibodiesinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hassansitiasma seroprevalenceofsarscov2antibodiesinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zaidahabdulrahman seroprevalenceofsarscov2antibodiesinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ismailnabilah seroprevalenceofsarscov2antibodiesinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohamedzeehaida seroprevalenceofsarscov2antibodiesinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis