Cargando…
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
A reliable estimate of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies is increasingly important to track the spread of infection and define the true burden of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted with the objective of estimating the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127257 |
_version_ | 1784733184731119616 |
---|---|
author | Hajissa, Khalid Islam, Md Asiful Hassan, Siti Asma Zaidah, Abdul Rahman Ismail, Nabilah Mohamed, Zeehaida |
author_facet | Hajissa, Khalid Islam, Md Asiful Hassan, Siti Asma Zaidah, Abdul Rahman Ismail, Nabilah Mohamed, Zeehaida |
author_sort | Hajissa, Khalid |
collection | PubMed |
description | A reliable estimate of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies is increasingly important to track the spread of infection and define the true burden of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted with the objective of estimating the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Africa. A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar electronic databases was conducted. Thirty-five eligible studies were included. Using meta-analysis of proportions, the overall seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was calculated as 16% (95% CI 13.1–18.9%). Based on antibody isotypes, 14.6% (95% CI 12.2–17.1%) and 11.5% (95% CI 8.7–14.2%) were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM, respectively, while 6.6% (95% CI 4.9–8.3%) were tested positive for both IgM and IgG. Healthcare workers (16.3%) had higher seroprevalence than the general population (11.7%), blood donors (7.5%) and pregnant women (5.7%). The finding of this systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) may not accurately reflect the true seroprevalence status of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Africa, hence, further seroprevalence studies across Africa are required to assess and monitor the growing COVID-19 burden. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9223681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92236812022-06-24 Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hajissa, Khalid Islam, Md Asiful Hassan, Siti Asma Zaidah, Abdul Rahman Ismail, Nabilah Mohamed, Zeehaida Int J Environ Res Public Health Article A reliable estimate of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies is increasingly important to track the spread of infection and define the true burden of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted with the objective of estimating the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Africa. A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar electronic databases was conducted. Thirty-five eligible studies were included. Using meta-analysis of proportions, the overall seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was calculated as 16% (95% CI 13.1–18.9%). Based on antibody isotypes, 14.6% (95% CI 12.2–17.1%) and 11.5% (95% CI 8.7–14.2%) were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM, respectively, while 6.6% (95% CI 4.9–8.3%) were tested positive for both IgM and IgG. Healthcare workers (16.3%) had higher seroprevalence than the general population (11.7%), blood donors (7.5%) and pregnant women (5.7%). The finding of this systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) may not accurately reflect the true seroprevalence status of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Africa, hence, further seroprevalence studies across Africa are required to assess and monitor the growing COVID-19 burden. MDPI 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9223681/ /pubmed/35742506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127257 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hajissa, Khalid Islam, Md Asiful Hassan, Siti Asma Zaidah, Abdul Rahman Ismail, Nabilah Mohamed, Zeehaida Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | seroprevalence of sars-cov-2 antibodies in africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127257 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hajissakhalid seroprevalenceofsarscov2antibodiesinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT islammdasiful seroprevalenceofsarscov2antibodiesinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hassansitiasma seroprevalenceofsarscov2antibodiesinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zaidahabdulrahman seroprevalenceofsarscov2antibodiesinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ismailnabilah seroprevalenceofsarscov2antibodiesinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohamedzeehaida seroprevalenceofsarscov2antibodiesinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |