Cargando…

Can Land Policy Promote Farmers’ Subjective Well-Being? A Study on Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads in Jinjiang, China

Urbanization and aging populations are threatening the sustainability of rural development around the world. Improving the happiness of rural residents is closely related not only to rural development but also to the harmony and stability of a country. Sustainable development has become an important...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Fachao, Wang, Zehua, Lin, Sheng-Hau
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127414
_version_ 1784733230237220864
author Liang, Fachao
Wang, Zehua
Lin, Sheng-Hau
author_facet Liang, Fachao
Wang, Zehua
Lin, Sheng-Hau
author_sort Liang, Fachao
collection PubMed
description Urbanization and aging populations are threatening the sustainability of rural development around the world. Improving the happiness of rural residents is closely related not only to rural development but also to the harmony and stability of a country. Sustainable development has become an important strategy for China’s rural areas. Although withdrawal from rural homesteads is an important issue in rural land policy, few researchers have examined the determinants of the subjective well-being of farmers following withdrawal. The current paper investigated 315 rural residents under three models of the “withdrawal from homestead” policy in Jinjiang City, Fujian Province, China. The application of the orderly probit model revealed how satisfaction with economic, social, environment, cultural, and policy factors impacted their subjective well-being. The pooled results showed that satisfaction with cultural and policy factors had no significant impact; however, the other aspects significantly promoted their subjective well-being. The empirical model with interaction terms indicated the significant positive impact of economic, environmental, and social factors on subjective well-being under the index replacement model, while only environment and social factors exerted a significant positive impact under the asset replacement and monetary compensation models. Corresponding policy implications are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9223863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92238632022-06-24 Can Land Policy Promote Farmers’ Subjective Well-Being? A Study on Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads in Jinjiang, China Liang, Fachao Wang, Zehua Lin, Sheng-Hau Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Urbanization and aging populations are threatening the sustainability of rural development around the world. Improving the happiness of rural residents is closely related not only to rural development but also to the harmony and stability of a country. Sustainable development has become an important strategy for China’s rural areas. Although withdrawal from rural homesteads is an important issue in rural land policy, few researchers have examined the determinants of the subjective well-being of farmers following withdrawal. The current paper investigated 315 rural residents under three models of the “withdrawal from homestead” policy in Jinjiang City, Fujian Province, China. The application of the orderly probit model revealed how satisfaction with economic, social, environment, cultural, and policy factors impacted their subjective well-being. The pooled results showed that satisfaction with cultural and policy factors had no significant impact; however, the other aspects significantly promoted their subjective well-being. The empirical model with interaction terms indicated the significant positive impact of economic, environmental, and social factors on subjective well-being under the index replacement model, while only environment and social factors exerted a significant positive impact under the asset replacement and monetary compensation models. Corresponding policy implications are discussed. MDPI 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9223863/ /pubmed/35742660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127414 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liang, Fachao
Wang, Zehua
Lin, Sheng-Hau
Can Land Policy Promote Farmers’ Subjective Well-Being? A Study on Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads in Jinjiang, China
title Can Land Policy Promote Farmers’ Subjective Well-Being? A Study on Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads in Jinjiang, China
title_full Can Land Policy Promote Farmers’ Subjective Well-Being? A Study on Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads in Jinjiang, China
title_fullStr Can Land Policy Promote Farmers’ Subjective Well-Being? A Study on Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads in Jinjiang, China
title_full_unstemmed Can Land Policy Promote Farmers’ Subjective Well-Being? A Study on Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads in Jinjiang, China
title_short Can Land Policy Promote Farmers’ Subjective Well-Being? A Study on Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads in Jinjiang, China
title_sort can land policy promote farmers’ subjective well-being? a study on withdrawal from rural homesteads in jinjiang, china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9223863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35742660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127414
work_keys_str_mv AT liangfachao canlandpolicypromotefarmerssubjectivewellbeingastudyonwithdrawalfromruralhomesteadsinjinjiangchina
AT wangzehua canlandpolicypromotefarmerssubjectivewellbeingastudyonwithdrawalfromruralhomesteadsinjinjiangchina
AT linshenghau canlandpolicypromotefarmerssubjectivewellbeingastudyonwithdrawalfromruralhomesteadsinjinjiangchina