Cargando…
Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction
Mandible defects are conventionally reconstructed using titanium plates. However, titanium causes metallic artifacts which impair radiological imaging. This study aims at evaluating mechanical fatigue of radiolucent fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (f-PEEK), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyeth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123308 |
_version_ | 1784733389518012416 |
---|---|
author | Lommen, Julian Schorn, Lara Sproll, Christoph Kübler, Norbert R. Nicolini, Luis Fernando Merfort, Ricarda Dilimulati, Ayimire Hildebrand, Frank Rana, Majeed Greven, Johannes |
author_facet | Lommen, Julian Schorn, Lara Sproll, Christoph Kübler, Norbert R. Nicolini, Luis Fernando Merfort, Ricarda Dilimulati, Ayimire Hildebrand, Frank Rana, Majeed Greven, Johannes |
author_sort | Lommen, Julian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mandible defects are conventionally reconstructed using titanium plates. However, titanium causes metallic artifacts which impair radiological imaging. This study aims at evaluating mechanical fatigue of radiolucent fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (f-PEEK), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), and polyphenylsulfone (PPSU) polymer plates for mandible reconstruction. A total of 30 plates (titanium [n = 6], f-PEEK [n = 6], PEEK [n = 6], PEKK [n = 6], PPSU [n = 6]) were implanted in synthetic mandibulectomized polyurethane mandibles. Servo-pneumatic mechanical testing with cyclic application of 30–300 N at 3 Hz was conducted. Bite forces were 70% on the unresected and 30% on the resected side. Total number of cycles was set to 250,000. Testing was aborted in case of plate or screw failure. Axial load to failure was tested with a speed of 1 mm/s. Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc tests were used. Titanium, f-PEEK, and PEEK showed no failure in fatigue testing and PPSU (p < 0.001) failed against titanium, f-PEEK, PEEK, and PEKK. Titanium allowed the highest load to failure compared to f-PEEK (p = 0.049), PEEK (p = 0.008), PEKK (p < 0.001), and PPSU (p = 0.007). f-PEEK, PEEK, and PEKK withstood expected physiological bite force. Although titanium plates provided the highest fatigue strength, f-PEEK and PEEK plates showed no failure over 250,000 chewing cycles indicating sufficient mechanical strength for mandible reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9224531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92245312022-06-24 Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction Lommen, Julian Schorn, Lara Sproll, Christoph Kübler, Norbert R. Nicolini, Luis Fernando Merfort, Ricarda Dilimulati, Ayimire Hildebrand, Frank Rana, Majeed Greven, Johannes J Clin Med Article Mandible defects are conventionally reconstructed using titanium plates. However, titanium causes metallic artifacts which impair radiological imaging. This study aims at evaluating mechanical fatigue of radiolucent fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (f-PEEK), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), and polyphenylsulfone (PPSU) polymer plates for mandible reconstruction. A total of 30 plates (titanium [n = 6], f-PEEK [n = 6], PEEK [n = 6], PEKK [n = 6], PPSU [n = 6]) were implanted in synthetic mandibulectomized polyurethane mandibles. Servo-pneumatic mechanical testing with cyclic application of 30–300 N at 3 Hz was conducted. Bite forces were 70% on the unresected and 30% on the resected side. Total number of cycles was set to 250,000. Testing was aborted in case of plate or screw failure. Axial load to failure was tested with a speed of 1 mm/s. Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc tests were used. Titanium, f-PEEK, and PEEK showed no failure in fatigue testing and PPSU (p < 0.001) failed against titanium, f-PEEK, PEEK, and PEKK. Titanium allowed the highest load to failure compared to f-PEEK (p = 0.049), PEEK (p = 0.008), PEKK (p < 0.001), and PPSU (p = 0.007). f-PEEK, PEEK, and PEKK withstood expected physiological bite force. Although titanium plates provided the highest fatigue strength, f-PEEK and PEEK plates showed no failure over 250,000 chewing cycles indicating sufficient mechanical strength for mandible reconstruction. MDPI 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9224531/ /pubmed/35743379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123308 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lommen, Julian Schorn, Lara Sproll, Christoph Kübler, Norbert R. Nicolini, Luis Fernando Merfort, Ricarda Dilimulati, Ayimire Hildebrand, Frank Rana, Majeed Greven, Johannes Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction |
title | Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction |
title_full | Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction |
title_short | Mechanical Fatigue Performance of Patient-Specific Polymer Plates in Oncologic Mandible Reconstruction |
title_sort | mechanical fatigue performance of patient-specific polymer plates in oncologic mandible reconstruction |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lommenjulian mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction AT schornlara mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction AT sprollchristoph mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction AT kublernorbertr mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction AT nicoliniluisfernando mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction AT merfortricarda mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction AT dilimulatiayimire mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction AT hildebrandfrank mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction AT ranamajeed mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction AT grevenjohannes mechanicalfatigueperformanceofpatientspecificpolymerplatesinoncologicmandiblereconstruction |