Cargando…
Immediate versus Delayed Attachment Incorporation Impact on Prosthetic Aftercare among Mandibular Implant—Supported Overdenture Wearers
Background: Substantial effort is dedicated to finding the most favorable parameters that will ensure low aftercare demands among edentulous patients wearing mandibular implant supported overdentures (MISODs). The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare prosthetic aftercare between...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123524 |
_version_ | 1784733414863142912 |
---|---|
author | Zenziper, Eran Rosner, Ofir Ghelfan, Oded Nissan, Joseph Blumer, Sigalit Ben-Izhack, Gil Davidovich, Moshe Chaushu, Liat Kahn, Adrian Naishlos, Sarit |
author_facet | Zenziper, Eran Rosner, Ofir Ghelfan, Oded Nissan, Joseph Blumer, Sigalit Ben-Izhack, Gil Davidovich, Moshe Chaushu, Liat Kahn, Adrian Naishlos, Sarit |
author_sort | Zenziper, Eran |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Substantial effort is dedicated to finding the most favorable parameters that will ensure low aftercare demands among edentulous patients wearing mandibular implant supported overdentures (MISODs). The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare prosthetic aftercare between MISOD patients with a simultaneous (group A) vs. a three-week settling in period (group B) prior to attachment incorporation. Methods: Forty-five patients enrolled in this study. Two implants per patient were placed using a two-stage implant insertion protocol. Second-stage surgery was performed after three months. All patients received ball attachments using the direct (chairside) incorporation method. Twenty-two patients received their dentures with simultaneous attachment activation and the rest—twenty-three patients—after a three-week settling in period. Patients’ files were scanned for aftercare visits. Outcome parameters included sore spot relief, attachment incorporation, and denture repair. Additionally, gingival index measurements were compared. Confounding factors included age, gender, and implant dimensions. Results: The mean follow-up for the entire cohort was 84 ± 21 months, and the range 39–120 months. The mean number of visits for group A vs. B respectively: pressure sores relieve (3.63 ± 0.84 vs. 3.71 ± 0.61, p = 0.581), liner exchange due to loss of retention (2.09 ± 1.03 vs. 2.31 ± 1.04 p = 0.487), and gingival index (1.3 ± 0.3 vs. 1.03 ± 0.2, p = 0.653) exhibited no statistically significant differences between the tested groups. No statistically significant differences between the groups were also noted for the denture repair aftercare treatments (p = 0.318) and the independent variables including age, gender, and implant length. Conclusions: Prosthetic aftercare in MISOD wearers is similar whether a simultaneous or a three-week settling in period for attachment incorporation is applied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9224628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92246282022-06-24 Immediate versus Delayed Attachment Incorporation Impact on Prosthetic Aftercare among Mandibular Implant—Supported Overdenture Wearers Zenziper, Eran Rosner, Ofir Ghelfan, Oded Nissan, Joseph Blumer, Sigalit Ben-Izhack, Gil Davidovich, Moshe Chaushu, Liat Kahn, Adrian Naishlos, Sarit J Clin Med Article Background: Substantial effort is dedicated to finding the most favorable parameters that will ensure low aftercare demands among edentulous patients wearing mandibular implant supported overdentures (MISODs). The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare prosthetic aftercare between MISOD patients with a simultaneous (group A) vs. a three-week settling in period (group B) prior to attachment incorporation. Methods: Forty-five patients enrolled in this study. Two implants per patient were placed using a two-stage implant insertion protocol. Second-stage surgery was performed after three months. All patients received ball attachments using the direct (chairside) incorporation method. Twenty-two patients received their dentures with simultaneous attachment activation and the rest—twenty-three patients—after a three-week settling in period. Patients’ files were scanned for aftercare visits. Outcome parameters included sore spot relief, attachment incorporation, and denture repair. Additionally, gingival index measurements were compared. Confounding factors included age, gender, and implant dimensions. Results: The mean follow-up for the entire cohort was 84 ± 21 months, and the range 39–120 months. The mean number of visits for group A vs. B respectively: pressure sores relieve (3.63 ± 0.84 vs. 3.71 ± 0.61, p = 0.581), liner exchange due to loss of retention (2.09 ± 1.03 vs. 2.31 ± 1.04 p = 0.487), and gingival index (1.3 ± 0.3 vs. 1.03 ± 0.2, p = 0.653) exhibited no statistically significant differences between the tested groups. No statistically significant differences between the groups were also noted for the denture repair aftercare treatments (p = 0.318) and the independent variables including age, gender, and implant length. Conclusions: Prosthetic aftercare in MISOD wearers is similar whether a simultaneous or a three-week settling in period for attachment incorporation is applied. MDPI 2022-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9224628/ /pubmed/35743594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123524 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zenziper, Eran Rosner, Ofir Ghelfan, Oded Nissan, Joseph Blumer, Sigalit Ben-Izhack, Gil Davidovich, Moshe Chaushu, Liat Kahn, Adrian Naishlos, Sarit Immediate versus Delayed Attachment Incorporation Impact on Prosthetic Aftercare among Mandibular Implant—Supported Overdenture Wearers |
title | Immediate versus Delayed Attachment Incorporation Impact on Prosthetic Aftercare among Mandibular Implant—Supported Overdenture Wearers |
title_full | Immediate versus Delayed Attachment Incorporation Impact on Prosthetic Aftercare among Mandibular Implant—Supported Overdenture Wearers |
title_fullStr | Immediate versus Delayed Attachment Incorporation Impact on Prosthetic Aftercare among Mandibular Implant—Supported Overdenture Wearers |
title_full_unstemmed | Immediate versus Delayed Attachment Incorporation Impact on Prosthetic Aftercare among Mandibular Implant—Supported Overdenture Wearers |
title_short | Immediate versus Delayed Attachment Incorporation Impact on Prosthetic Aftercare among Mandibular Implant—Supported Overdenture Wearers |
title_sort | immediate versus delayed attachment incorporation impact on prosthetic aftercare among mandibular implant—supported overdenture wearers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123524 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zenzipereran immediateversusdelayedattachmentincorporationimpactonprostheticaftercareamongmandibularimplantsupportedoverdenturewearers AT rosnerofir immediateversusdelayedattachmentincorporationimpactonprostheticaftercareamongmandibularimplantsupportedoverdenturewearers AT ghelfanoded immediateversusdelayedattachmentincorporationimpactonprostheticaftercareamongmandibularimplantsupportedoverdenturewearers AT nissanjoseph immediateversusdelayedattachmentincorporationimpactonprostheticaftercareamongmandibularimplantsupportedoverdenturewearers AT blumersigalit immediateversusdelayedattachmentincorporationimpactonprostheticaftercareamongmandibularimplantsupportedoverdenturewearers AT benizhackgil immediateversusdelayedattachmentincorporationimpactonprostheticaftercareamongmandibularimplantsupportedoverdenturewearers AT davidovichmoshe immediateversusdelayedattachmentincorporationimpactonprostheticaftercareamongmandibularimplantsupportedoverdenturewearers AT chaushuliat immediateversusdelayedattachmentincorporationimpactonprostheticaftercareamongmandibularimplantsupportedoverdenturewearers AT kahnadrian immediateversusdelayedattachmentincorporationimpactonprostheticaftercareamongmandibularimplantsupportedoverdenturewearers AT naishlossarit immediateversusdelayedattachmentincorporationimpactonprostheticaftercareamongmandibularimplantsupportedoverdenturewearers |