Cargando…
Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion (ACDF) may be performed with different kinds of stand-alone cages. Tantalum and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are two of the most commonly used materials in this procedure. Few comparisons between different stand-alone implants for ACDF hav...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060986 |
_version_ | 1784733421088538624 |
---|---|
author | Mazzucchi, Edoardo La Rocca, Giuseppe Perna, Andrea Pignotti, Fabrizio Galieri, Gianluca De Santis, Vincenzo Rinaldi, Pierluigi Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro Sabatino, Giovanni |
author_facet | Mazzucchi, Edoardo La Rocca, Giuseppe Perna, Andrea Pignotti, Fabrizio Galieri, Gianluca De Santis, Vincenzo Rinaldi, Pierluigi Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro Sabatino, Giovanni |
author_sort | Mazzucchi, Edoardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion (ACDF) may be performed with different kinds of stand-alone cages. Tantalum and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are two of the most commonly used materials in this procedure. Few comparisons between different stand-alone implants for ACDF have been reported in the literature. Methods: We performed a comparison between patients who underwent ACDF with either a porous tantalum or a PEEK stand-alone cage, in two spine surgery units for single-level disc herniation. Clinical outcome [Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Short Form-36 (SF-36)] and radiological outcome (lordosis, fusion and subsidence) were measured before surgery and at least one year after surgery in both groups. Results: Thirty-eight patients underwent ACDF with a porous tantalum cage, and thirty-one with a PEEK cage. The improvement of NDI and SF-36 was significantly superior in the PEEK group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.049 respectively). Moreover, the variation of the Cobb angle for the cervical spine was significantly higher in the PEEK group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In a retrospective analysis of two groups of patients with at least one year of follow-up, a stand-alone PEEK cage showed superior clinical results, with improved cervical lordosis, compared to a stand-alone porous tantalum cage. Further studies are needed to confirm these data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9224653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92246532022-06-24 Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages Mazzucchi, Edoardo La Rocca, Giuseppe Perna, Andrea Pignotti, Fabrizio Galieri, Gianluca De Santis, Vincenzo Rinaldi, Pierluigi Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro Sabatino, Giovanni J Pers Med Article Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion (ACDF) may be performed with different kinds of stand-alone cages. Tantalum and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are two of the most commonly used materials in this procedure. Few comparisons between different stand-alone implants for ACDF have been reported in the literature. Methods: We performed a comparison between patients who underwent ACDF with either a porous tantalum or a PEEK stand-alone cage, in two spine surgery units for single-level disc herniation. Clinical outcome [Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Short Form-36 (SF-36)] and radiological outcome (lordosis, fusion and subsidence) were measured before surgery and at least one year after surgery in both groups. Results: Thirty-eight patients underwent ACDF with a porous tantalum cage, and thirty-one with a PEEK cage. The improvement of NDI and SF-36 was significantly superior in the PEEK group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.049 respectively). Moreover, the variation of the Cobb angle for the cervical spine was significantly higher in the PEEK group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In a retrospective analysis of two groups of patients with at least one year of follow-up, a stand-alone PEEK cage showed superior clinical results, with improved cervical lordosis, compared to a stand-alone porous tantalum cage. Further studies are needed to confirm these data. MDPI 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9224653/ /pubmed/35743770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060986 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mazzucchi, Edoardo La Rocca, Giuseppe Perna, Andrea Pignotti, Fabrizio Galieri, Gianluca De Santis, Vincenzo Rinaldi, Pierluigi Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro Sabatino, Giovanni Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages |
title | Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages |
title_full | Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages |
title_fullStr | Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages |
title_short | Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages |
title_sort | single-level anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion: a comparison between porous tantalum and polyetheretherketone cages |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060986 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazzucchiedoardo singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages AT laroccagiuseppe singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages AT pernaandrea singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages AT pignottifabrizio singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages AT galierigianluca singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages AT desantisvincenzo singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages AT rinaldipierluigi singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages AT tamburrellifrancescociro singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages AT sabatinogiovanni singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages |