Cargando…

Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion (ACDF) may be performed with different kinds of stand-alone cages. Tantalum and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are two of the most commonly used materials in this procedure. Few comparisons between different stand-alone implants for ACDF hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazzucchi, Edoardo, La Rocca, Giuseppe, Perna, Andrea, Pignotti, Fabrizio, Galieri, Gianluca, De Santis, Vincenzo, Rinaldi, Pierluigi, Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro, Sabatino, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743770
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060986
_version_ 1784733421088538624
author Mazzucchi, Edoardo
La Rocca, Giuseppe
Perna, Andrea
Pignotti, Fabrizio
Galieri, Gianluca
De Santis, Vincenzo
Rinaldi, Pierluigi
Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro
Sabatino, Giovanni
author_facet Mazzucchi, Edoardo
La Rocca, Giuseppe
Perna, Andrea
Pignotti, Fabrizio
Galieri, Gianluca
De Santis, Vincenzo
Rinaldi, Pierluigi
Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro
Sabatino, Giovanni
author_sort Mazzucchi, Edoardo
collection PubMed
description Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion (ACDF) may be performed with different kinds of stand-alone cages. Tantalum and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are two of the most commonly used materials in this procedure. Few comparisons between different stand-alone implants for ACDF have been reported in the literature. Methods: We performed a comparison between patients who underwent ACDF with either a porous tantalum or a PEEK stand-alone cage, in two spine surgery units for single-level disc herniation. Clinical outcome [Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Short Form-36 (SF-36)] and radiological outcome (lordosis, fusion and subsidence) were measured before surgery and at least one year after surgery in both groups. Results: Thirty-eight patients underwent ACDF with a porous tantalum cage, and thirty-one with a PEEK cage. The improvement of NDI and SF-36 was significantly superior in the PEEK group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.049 respectively). Moreover, the variation of the Cobb angle for the cervical spine was significantly higher in the PEEK group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In a retrospective analysis of two groups of patients with at least one year of follow-up, a stand-alone PEEK cage showed superior clinical results, with improved cervical lordosis, compared to a stand-alone porous tantalum cage. Further studies are needed to confirm these data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9224653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92246532022-06-24 Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages Mazzucchi, Edoardo La Rocca, Giuseppe Perna, Andrea Pignotti, Fabrizio Galieri, Gianluca De Santis, Vincenzo Rinaldi, Pierluigi Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro Sabatino, Giovanni J Pers Med Article Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion (ACDF) may be performed with different kinds of stand-alone cages. Tantalum and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are two of the most commonly used materials in this procedure. Few comparisons between different stand-alone implants for ACDF have been reported in the literature. Methods: We performed a comparison between patients who underwent ACDF with either a porous tantalum or a PEEK stand-alone cage, in two spine surgery units for single-level disc herniation. Clinical outcome [Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Short Form-36 (SF-36)] and radiological outcome (lordosis, fusion and subsidence) were measured before surgery and at least one year after surgery in both groups. Results: Thirty-eight patients underwent ACDF with a porous tantalum cage, and thirty-one with a PEEK cage. The improvement of NDI and SF-36 was significantly superior in the PEEK group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.049 respectively). Moreover, the variation of the Cobb angle for the cervical spine was significantly higher in the PEEK group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In a retrospective analysis of two groups of patients with at least one year of follow-up, a stand-alone PEEK cage showed superior clinical results, with improved cervical lordosis, compared to a stand-alone porous tantalum cage. Further studies are needed to confirm these data. MDPI 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9224653/ /pubmed/35743770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060986 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mazzucchi, Edoardo
La Rocca, Giuseppe
Perna, Andrea
Pignotti, Fabrizio
Galieri, Gianluca
De Santis, Vincenzo
Rinaldi, Pierluigi
Tamburrelli, Francesco Ciro
Sabatino, Giovanni
Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages
title Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages
title_full Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages
title_fullStr Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages
title_full_unstemmed Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages
title_short Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion: A Comparison between Porous Tantalum and Polyetheretherketone Cages
title_sort single-level anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion: a comparison between porous tantalum and polyetheretherketone cages
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743770
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060986
work_keys_str_mv AT mazzucchiedoardo singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages
AT laroccagiuseppe singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages
AT pernaandrea singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages
AT pignottifabrizio singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages
AT galierigianluca singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages
AT desantisvincenzo singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages
AT rinaldipierluigi singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages
AT tamburrellifrancescociro singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages
AT sabatinogiovanni singlelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandinterbodyfusionacomparisonbetweenporoustantalumandpolyetheretherketonecages