Cargando…

Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer According to a Standardized MRI Classification System: A Systematic Review of the Literature

(1) Background: The classification of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is not currently standardized. The aim of this review was to evaluate pelvic LRRC according to the Beyond TME (BTME) classification system and to consider commonly associated primary tumour characteristics. (2) Methods: A s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rokan, Zena, Simillis, Constantinos, Kontovounisios, Christos, Moran, Brendan, Tekkis, Paris, Brown, Gina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123511
_version_ 1784733421323419648
author Rokan, Zena
Simillis, Constantinos
Kontovounisios, Christos
Moran, Brendan
Tekkis, Paris
Brown, Gina
author_facet Rokan, Zena
Simillis, Constantinos
Kontovounisios, Christos
Moran, Brendan
Tekkis, Paris
Brown, Gina
author_sort Rokan, Zena
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: The classification of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is not currently standardized. The aim of this review was to evaluate pelvic LRRC according to the Beyond TME (BTME) classification system and to consider commonly associated primary tumour characteristics. (2) Methods: A systematic review of the literature prior to April 2020 was performed through electronic searches of the Science Citation Index Expanded, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases. The primary outcome was to assess the location and frequency of previously classified pelvic LRRC and translate this information into the BTME system. Secondary outcomes were assessing primary tumour characteristics. (3) Results: A total of 58 eligible studies classified 4558 sites of LRRC, most commonly found in the central compartment (18%), following anterior resection (44%), in patients with an ‘advanced’ primary tumour (63%) and following neoadjuvant radiotherapy (29%). Most patients also classified had a low rectal primary tumour. The lymph node status of the primary tumour leading to LRRC was comparable, with 52% node positive versus 48% node negative tumours. (4) Conclusions: This review evaluates the largest number of LRRCs to date using a single classification system. It has also highlighted the need for standardized reporting in order to optimise perioperative treatment planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9224654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92246542022-06-24 Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer According to a Standardized MRI Classification System: A Systematic Review of the Literature Rokan, Zena Simillis, Constantinos Kontovounisios, Christos Moran, Brendan Tekkis, Paris Brown, Gina J Clin Med Systematic Review (1) Background: The classification of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is not currently standardized. The aim of this review was to evaluate pelvic LRRC according to the Beyond TME (BTME) classification system and to consider commonly associated primary tumour characteristics. (2) Methods: A systematic review of the literature prior to April 2020 was performed through electronic searches of the Science Citation Index Expanded, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases. The primary outcome was to assess the location and frequency of previously classified pelvic LRRC and translate this information into the BTME system. Secondary outcomes were assessing primary tumour characteristics. (3) Results: A total of 58 eligible studies classified 4558 sites of LRRC, most commonly found in the central compartment (18%), following anterior resection (44%), in patients with an ‘advanced’ primary tumour (63%) and following neoadjuvant radiotherapy (29%). Most patients also classified had a low rectal primary tumour. The lymph node status of the primary tumour leading to LRRC was comparable, with 52% node positive versus 48% node negative tumours. (4) Conclusions: This review evaluates the largest number of LRRCs to date using a single classification system. It has also highlighted the need for standardized reporting in order to optimise perioperative treatment planning. MDPI 2022-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9224654/ /pubmed/35743581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123511 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Rokan, Zena
Simillis, Constantinos
Kontovounisios, Christos
Moran, Brendan
Tekkis, Paris
Brown, Gina
Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer According to a Standardized MRI Classification System: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer According to a Standardized MRI Classification System: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer According to a Standardized MRI Classification System: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer According to a Standardized MRI Classification System: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer According to a Standardized MRI Classification System: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_short Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer According to a Standardized MRI Classification System: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_sort locally recurrent rectal cancer according to a standardized mri classification system: a systematic review of the literature
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123511
work_keys_str_mv AT rokanzena locallyrecurrentrectalcanceraccordingtoastandardizedmriclassificationsystemasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT simillisconstantinos locallyrecurrentrectalcanceraccordingtoastandardizedmriclassificationsystemasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT kontovounisioschristos locallyrecurrentrectalcanceraccordingtoastandardizedmriclassificationsystemasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT moranbrendan locallyrecurrentrectalcanceraccordingtoastandardizedmriclassificationsystemasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT tekkisparis locallyrecurrentrectalcanceraccordingtoastandardizedmriclassificationsystemasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT browngina locallyrecurrentrectalcanceraccordingtoastandardizedmriclassificationsystemasystematicreviewoftheliterature