Cargando…
Validity and Utility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Copy Number Variations and Microdeletions: A Systematic Review
Valid data on prenatal cell-free DNA-based screening tests for copy number variations and microdeletions are still insufficient. We aimed to compare different methodological approaches concerning the achieved diagnostic accuracy measurements and positive predictive values. For this systematic review...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123350 |
_version_ | 1784733423797010432 |
---|---|
author | Zaninović, Luca Bašković, Marko Ježek, Davor Katušić Bojanac, Ana |
author_facet | Zaninović, Luca Bašković, Marko Ježek, Davor Katušić Bojanac, Ana |
author_sort | Zaninović, Luca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Valid data on prenatal cell-free DNA-based screening tests for copy number variations and microdeletions are still insufficient. We aimed to compare different methodological approaches concerning the achieved diagnostic accuracy measurements and positive predictive values. For this systematic review, we searched the Scopus and PubMed databases and backward citations for studies published between 2013 and 4 February 2022 and included articles reporting the analytical and clinical performance of cfDNA screening tests for CNVs and microdeletions. Of the 1810 articles identified, 32 met the criteria. The reported sensitivity of the applied tests ranged from 20% to 100%, the specificity from 81.62% to 100%, and the PPV from 3% to 100% for cases with diagnostic or clinical follow-up information. No confirmatory analysis was available in the majority of cases with negative screening results, and, therefore, the NPVs could not be determined. NIPT for CNVs and microdeletions should be used with caution and any developments regarding new technologies should undergo strict evaluation before their implementation into clinical practice. Indications for testing should be in correlation with the application guidelines issued by international organizations in the field of prenatal diagnostics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9224664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92246642022-06-24 Validity and Utility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Copy Number Variations and Microdeletions: A Systematic Review Zaninović, Luca Bašković, Marko Ježek, Davor Katušić Bojanac, Ana J Clin Med Systematic Review Valid data on prenatal cell-free DNA-based screening tests for copy number variations and microdeletions are still insufficient. We aimed to compare different methodological approaches concerning the achieved diagnostic accuracy measurements and positive predictive values. For this systematic review, we searched the Scopus and PubMed databases and backward citations for studies published between 2013 and 4 February 2022 and included articles reporting the analytical and clinical performance of cfDNA screening tests for CNVs and microdeletions. Of the 1810 articles identified, 32 met the criteria. The reported sensitivity of the applied tests ranged from 20% to 100%, the specificity from 81.62% to 100%, and the PPV from 3% to 100% for cases with diagnostic or clinical follow-up information. No confirmatory analysis was available in the majority of cases with negative screening results, and, therefore, the NPVs could not be determined. NIPT for CNVs and microdeletions should be used with caution and any developments regarding new technologies should undergo strict evaluation before their implementation into clinical practice. Indications for testing should be in correlation with the application guidelines issued by international organizations in the field of prenatal diagnostics. MDPI 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9224664/ /pubmed/35743413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123350 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Zaninović, Luca Bašković, Marko Ježek, Davor Katušić Bojanac, Ana Validity and Utility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Copy Number Variations and Microdeletions: A Systematic Review |
title | Validity and Utility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Copy Number Variations and Microdeletions: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Validity and Utility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Copy Number Variations and Microdeletions: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Validity and Utility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Copy Number Variations and Microdeletions: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and Utility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Copy Number Variations and Microdeletions: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Validity and Utility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Copy Number Variations and Microdeletions: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | validity and utility of non-invasive prenatal testing for copy number variations and microdeletions: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zaninovicluca validityandutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforcopynumbervariationsandmicrodeletionsasystematicreview AT baskovicmarko validityandutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforcopynumbervariationsandmicrodeletionsasystematicreview AT jezekdavor validityandutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforcopynumbervariationsandmicrodeletionsasystematicreview AT katusicbojanacana validityandutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforcopynumbervariationsandmicrodeletionsasystematicreview |