Cargando…

Comparison of Retention between Conventional and Nanofilled Resin Sealants in a Paediatric Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: This study compared conventional-resin-sealant versus nanofilled-sealant retention at different intervals. Methods: A double-blinded split-mouth randomized control trial was performed on sixty-two children aged from six to nine years. Participants with one pair of contralateral permanent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamath, Vinayak, Hebbal, Mamata, Ankola, Anil, Sankeshwari, Roopali, Jalihal, Sagar, Choudhury, Abhra, Soliman, Mai, Eldwakhly, Elzahraa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123276
_version_ 1784733437507141632
author Kamath, Vinayak
Hebbal, Mamata
Ankola, Anil
Sankeshwari, Roopali
Jalihal, Sagar
Choudhury, Abhra
Soliman, Mai
Eldwakhly, Elzahraa
author_facet Kamath, Vinayak
Hebbal, Mamata
Ankola, Anil
Sankeshwari, Roopali
Jalihal, Sagar
Choudhury, Abhra
Soliman, Mai
Eldwakhly, Elzahraa
author_sort Kamath, Vinayak
collection PubMed
description Background: This study compared conventional-resin-sealant versus nanofilled-sealant retention at different intervals. Methods: A double-blinded split-mouth randomized control trial was performed on sixty-two children aged from six to nine years. Participants with one pair of contralateral permanent first molars with deep fissures or noncavitated carious lesions were randomly selected for sealant application. Conventional resin sealant was applied on one molar and nanofilled sealant on the contralateral molar. Evaluations were performed at one, three, six, twelve and eighteen months to check for retention. The chi-squared test, McNemar test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Friedman test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Conventional resin sealant showed complete retention in 91.4%, 86.2%, 74.1%, 62.1% and 55.2% of the teeth, and nanofilled sealant showed complete retention in 89.7%, 81%, 77.6%, 69% and 67.2% of the teeth, at the end of 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months evaluation, respectively. Each sealant exhibited a statistically significant change (p < 0.05) in the retention rate during the evaluation period. However, when both the sealants were compared with each other, there was no statistically significant difference in any phase. At the end of 18 months, caries development was observed in 13.8% of the teeth sealed with conventional sealant, and in 10.3% of the teeth sealed with nanofilled sealant. Conclusion: At eighteen months, the nanofilled resin sealant exhibited complete retention in 12% more teeth than the conventional sealant. However, the difference was not statistically significant. The nanofilled resin sealant yielded an acceptable performance in sealing the occlusal pits and fissures of mandibular permanent first molars, compared to conventional pit-and-fissure sealants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9224720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92247202022-06-24 Comparison of Retention between Conventional and Nanofilled Resin Sealants in a Paediatric Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial Kamath, Vinayak Hebbal, Mamata Ankola, Anil Sankeshwari, Roopali Jalihal, Sagar Choudhury, Abhra Soliman, Mai Eldwakhly, Elzahraa J Clin Med Article Background: This study compared conventional-resin-sealant versus nanofilled-sealant retention at different intervals. Methods: A double-blinded split-mouth randomized control trial was performed on sixty-two children aged from six to nine years. Participants with one pair of contralateral permanent first molars with deep fissures or noncavitated carious lesions were randomly selected for sealant application. Conventional resin sealant was applied on one molar and nanofilled sealant on the contralateral molar. Evaluations were performed at one, three, six, twelve and eighteen months to check for retention. The chi-squared test, McNemar test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Friedman test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Conventional resin sealant showed complete retention in 91.4%, 86.2%, 74.1%, 62.1% and 55.2% of the teeth, and nanofilled sealant showed complete retention in 89.7%, 81%, 77.6%, 69% and 67.2% of the teeth, at the end of 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months evaluation, respectively. Each sealant exhibited a statistically significant change (p < 0.05) in the retention rate during the evaluation period. However, when both the sealants were compared with each other, there was no statistically significant difference in any phase. At the end of 18 months, caries development was observed in 13.8% of the teeth sealed with conventional sealant, and in 10.3% of the teeth sealed with nanofilled sealant. Conclusion: At eighteen months, the nanofilled resin sealant exhibited complete retention in 12% more teeth than the conventional sealant. However, the difference was not statistically significant. The nanofilled resin sealant yielded an acceptable performance in sealing the occlusal pits and fissures of mandibular permanent first molars, compared to conventional pit-and-fissure sealants. MDPI 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9224720/ /pubmed/35743349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123276 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kamath, Vinayak
Hebbal, Mamata
Ankola, Anil
Sankeshwari, Roopali
Jalihal, Sagar
Choudhury, Abhra
Soliman, Mai
Eldwakhly, Elzahraa
Comparison of Retention between Conventional and Nanofilled Resin Sealants in a Paediatric Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Comparison of Retention between Conventional and Nanofilled Resin Sealants in a Paediatric Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Comparison of Retention between Conventional and Nanofilled Resin Sealants in a Paediatric Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Retention between Conventional and Nanofilled Resin Sealants in a Paediatric Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Retention between Conventional and Nanofilled Resin Sealants in a Paediatric Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Comparison of Retention between Conventional and Nanofilled Resin Sealants in a Paediatric Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort comparison of retention between conventional and nanofilled resin sealants in a paediatric population: a randomized clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123276
work_keys_str_mv AT kamathvinayak comparisonofretentionbetweenconventionalandnanofilledresinsealantsinapaediatricpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hebbalmamata comparisonofretentionbetweenconventionalandnanofilledresinsealantsinapaediatricpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ankolaanil comparisonofretentionbetweenconventionalandnanofilledresinsealantsinapaediatricpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sankeshwariroopali comparisonofretentionbetweenconventionalandnanofilledresinsealantsinapaediatricpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jalihalsagar comparisonofretentionbetweenconventionalandnanofilledresinsealantsinapaediatricpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT choudhuryabhra comparisonofretentionbetweenconventionalandnanofilledresinsealantsinapaediatricpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT solimanmai comparisonofretentionbetweenconventionalandnanofilledresinsealantsinapaediatricpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT eldwakhlyelzahraa comparisonofretentionbetweenconventionalandnanofilledresinsealantsinapaediatricpopulationarandomizedclinicaltrial