Cargando…

Acetabular Revision Surgery with Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup for Failed Acetabular Cage Reconstruction with Bone Allografts: A Retrospective Study with Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up

Background: Acetabular cage reconstruction with bone allografts is among the successful strategies to deal with massive acetabular bone loss. However, the nonbiological fixation nature of cages can compromise long-term success. Tantalum trabecular metal acetabular cups (TM cups) have been used in ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Chen-Heng, Hu, Chih-Chien, Chang, Chih-Hsiang, Chang, Yu-Han, Shih, Hsin-Nung, Chen, Chun-Chieh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743498
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123428
_version_ 1784733454442692608
author Hsu, Chen-Heng
Hu, Chih-Chien
Chang, Chih-Hsiang
Chang, Yu-Han
Shih, Hsin-Nung
Chen, Chun-Chieh
author_facet Hsu, Chen-Heng
Hu, Chih-Chien
Chang, Chih-Hsiang
Chang, Yu-Han
Shih, Hsin-Nung
Chen, Chun-Chieh
author_sort Hsu, Chen-Heng
collection PubMed
description Background: Acetabular cage reconstruction with bone allografts is among the successful strategies to deal with massive acetabular bone loss. However, the nonbiological fixation nature of cages can compromise long-term success. Tantalum trabecular metal acetabular cups (TM cups) have been used in acetabular revision surgery because of their increased initial stability and good bone ingrowth features. This study was performed to determine whether the bone stock of the acetabulum is enough to support a hemispheric TM cup after failed cage reconstruction with bone allografts. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who received acetabular revision surgery with TM cups after failed cage reconstruction with bone allografts from 2006 to 2017. There were 12 patients (5 males and 7 females) included in this study, with a mean age of 61.5 years (38 to 81) at the time of re-revision surgery. The mean follow-up after re-revision surgery was 8.6 years (2.6 to 13.3). The endpoint was defined as the aseptic loosening of the TM cup and reoperation for any causes. The change in bone stock of the acetabulum between index revision and re-revision was assessed according to the Gross classification for acetabular bone loss. Results: One patient died after eight years of follow-up of a cause not related to hip surgery. Two patients received two-stage revision arthroplasty due to PJI after 3.2 and 9.4 years of follow-up, respectively. The bone stock of the acetabulum was significantly improved between index revision and re-revision surgery (p < 0.0001). The Kaplan–Meier survivorship was 100% with aseptic loosening as the endpoint and 90% and 75% at five- and ten-year follow-up, respectively, with reoperation for any reason as the endpoint. Even cage reconstruction with bone allografts will fail eventually, and the bone stock of the acetabulum will improve after union and incorporation between host bone and allografts. The restored bone stocks will facilitate further revision surgery with hemispheric TM cups. The biological fixation between host bone and tantalum trabecular metal can provide longstanding stability of the TM cup. Conclusions: The results of our study offer a viable option for patients with failed cage reconstruction with bone allografts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9224788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92247882022-06-24 Acetabular Revision Surgery with Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup for Failed Acetabular Cage Reconstruction with Bone Allografts: A Retrospective Study with Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up Hsu, Chen-Heng Hu, Chih-Chien Chang, Chih-Hsiang Chang, Yu-Han Shih, Hsin-Nung Chen, Chun-Chieh J Clin Med Article Background: Acetabular cage reconstruction with bone allografts is among the successful strategies to deal with massive acetabular bone loss. However, the nonbiological fixation nature of cages can compromise long-term success. Tantalum trabecular metal acetabular cups (TM cups) have been used in acetabular revision surgery because of their increased initial stability and good bone ingrowth features. This study was performed to determine whether the bone stock of the acetabulum is enough to support a hemispheric TM cup after failed cage reconstruction with bone allografts. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who received acetabular revision surgery with TM cups after failed cage reconstruction with bone allografts from 2006 to 2017. There were 12 patients (5 males and 7 females) included in this study, with a mean age of 61.5 years (38 to 81) at the time of re-revision surgery. The mean follow-up after re-revision surgery was 8.6 years (2.6 to 13.3). The endpoint was defined as the aseptic loosening of the TM cup and reoperation for any causes. The change in bone stock of the acetabulum between index revision and re-revision was assessed according to the Gross classification for acetabular bone loss. Results: One patient died after eight years of follow-up of a cause not related to hip surgery. Two patients received two-stage revision arthroplasty due to PJI after 3.2 and 9.4 years of follow-up, respectively. The bone stock of the acetabulum was significantly improved between index revision and re-revision surgery (p < 0.0001). The Kaplan–Meier survivorship was 100% with aseptic loosening as the endpoint and 90% and 75% at five- and ten-year follow-up, respectively, with reoperation for any reason as the endpoint. Even cage reconstruction with bone allografts will fail eventually, and the bone stock of the acetabulum will improve after union and incorporation between host bone and allografts. The restored bone stocks will facilitate further revision surgery with hemispheric TM cups. The biological fixation between host bone and tantalum trabecular metal can provide longstanding stability of the TM cup. Conclusions: The results of our study offer a viable option for patients with failed cage reconstruction with bone allografts. MDPI 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9224788/ /pubmed/35743498 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123428 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hsu, Chen-Heng
Hu, Chih-Chien
Chang, Chih-Hsiang
Chang, Yu-Han
Shih, Hsin-Nung
Chen, Chun-Chieh
Acetabular Revision Surgery with Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup for Failed Acetabular Cage Reconstruction with Bone Allografts: A Retrospective Study with Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up
title Acetabular Revision Surgery with Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup for Failed Acetabular Cage Reconstruction with Bone Allografts: A Retrospective Study with Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up
title_full Acetabular Revision Surgery with Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup for Failed Acetabular Cage Reconstruction with Bone Allografts: A Retrospective Study with Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up
title_fullStr Acetabular Revision Surgery with Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup for Failed Acetabular Cage Reconstruction with Bone Allografts: A Retrospective Study with Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Acetabular Revision Surgery with Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup for Failed Acetabular Cage Reconstruction with Bone Allografts: A Retrospective Study with Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up
title_short Acetabular Revision Surgery with Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup for Failed Acetabular Cage Reconstruction with Bone Allografts: A Retrospective Study with Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up
title_sort acetabular revision surgery with tantalum trabecular metal acetabular cup for failed acetabular cage reconstruction with bone allografts: a retrospective study with mid- to long-term follow-up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743498
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123428
work_keys_str_mv AT hsuchenheng acetabularrevisionsurgerywithtantalumtrabecularmetalacetabularcupforfailedacetabularcagereconstructionwithboneallograftsaretrospectivestudywithmidtolongtermfollowup
AT huchihchien acetabularrevisionsurgerywithtantalumtrabecularmetalacetabularcupforfailedacetabularcagereconstructionwithboneallograftsaretrospectivestudywithmidtolongtermfollowup
AT changchihhsiang acetabularrevisionsurgerywithtantalumtrabecularmetalacetabularcupforfailedacetabularcagereconstructionwithboneallograftsaretrospectivestudywithmidtolongtermfollowup
AT changyuhan acetabularrevisionsurgerywithtantalumtrabecularmetalacetabularcupforfailedacetabularcagereconstructionwithboneallograftsaretrospectivestudywithmidtolongtermfollowup
AT shihhsinnung acetabularrevisionsurgerywithtantalumtrabecularmetalacetabularcupforfailedacetabularcagereconstructionwithboneallograftsaretrospectivestudywithmidtolongtermfollowup
AT chenchunchieh acetabularrevisionsurgerywithtantalumtrabecularmetalacetabularcupforfailedacetabularcagereconstructionwithboneallograftsaretrospectivestudywithmidtolongtermfollowup