Cargando…

Expert Multinational Consensus Statement for Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA) Using the Delphi Method †

Introduction: The use of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) has been well established as an anaesthetic technique over the last few decades. Significant variation in practice exists however, and volatile agents are still commonly used. This study aims to determine the motivations and barriers for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uitenbosch, Giulia, Sng, Daniel, Carvalho, Hugo N., Cata, Juan P., De Boer, Hans D., Erdoes, Gabor, Heytens, Luc, Lois, Fernande Jane, Rousseau, Anne-Françoise, Pelosi, Paolo, Forget, Patrice, Nesvadba, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123486
_version_ 1784733518374371328
author Uitenbosch, Giulia
Sng, Daniel
Carvalho, Hugo N.
Cata, Juan P.
De Boer, Hans D.
Erdoes, Gabor
Heytens, Luc
Lois, Fernande Jane
Rousseau, Anne-Françoise
Pelosi, Paolo
Forget, Patrice
Nesvadba, David
author_facet Uitenbosch, Giulia
Sng, Daniel
Carvalho, Hugo N.
Cata, Juan P.
De Boer, Hans D.
Erdoes, Gabor
Heytens, Luc
Lois, Fernande Jane
Rousseau, Anne-Françoise
Pelosi, Paolo
Forget, Patrice
Nesvadba, David
author_sort Uitenbosch, Giulia
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The use of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) has been well established as an anaesthetic technique over the last few decades. Significant variation in practice exists however, and volatile agents are still commonly used. This study aims to determine the motivations and barriers for using TIVA over the use of volatile agents by analysing the opinion of several international anaesthetists with specific expertise or interests. Methods and participants: The Delphi method was used to gain the opinions of expert panellists with a range of anaesthetic subspecialty expertise. Twenty-nine panellists were invited to complete three survey rounds containing statements regarding the use of TIVA. Anonymised data were captured through the software REDCap and analysed for consensus and prioritisation across statements. Starting with 12 statements, strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. Stability was assessed between rounds. Results: Strong consensus was achieved for four statements regarding considerations for the use of TIVA. These statements addressed whether TIVA is useful in paediatric anaesthesia, the importance of TIVA in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, its positive impact on the environment and effect on patient physiology, such as airway and haemodynamic control. Conclusions: Using the Delphi method, this international consensus showed that cost, lack of familiarity or training and the risk of delayed emergence are not considered obstacles to TIVA use. It appears, instead, that the primary motivations for its adoption are the impact of TIVA on patient experience, especially in paediatrics, and the benefit to the overall procedure outcome. The effect of TIVA on postoperative nausea and vomiting and patient physiology, as well as improving its availability in paediatrics were considered as priorities. We also identified areas where the debate remains open, generating new research questions on geographical variation and the potential impact of local availability of monitoring equipment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9225030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92250302022-06-24 Expert Multinational Consensus Statement for Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA) Using the Delphi Method † Uitenbosch, Giulia Sng, Daniel Carvalho, Hugo N. Cata, Juan P. De Boer, Hans D. Erdoes, Gabor Heytens, Luc Lois, Fernande Jane Rousseau, Anne-Françoise Pelosi, Paolo Forget, Patrice Nesvadba, David J Clin Med Article Introduction: The use of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) has been well established as an anaesthetic technique over the last few decades. Significant variation in practice exists however, and volatile agents are still commonly used. This study aims to determine the motivations and barriers for using TIVA over the use of volatile agents by analysing the opinion of several international anaesthetists with specific expertise or interests. Methods and participants: The Delphi method was used to gain the opinions of expert panellists with a range of anaesthetic subspecialty expertise. Twenty-nine panellists were invited to complete three survey rounds containing statements regarding the use of TIVA. Anonymised data were captured through the software REDCap and analysed for consensus and prioritisation across statements. Starting with 12 statements, strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. Stability was assessed between rounds. Results: Strong consensus was achieved for four statements regarding considerations for the use of TIVA. These statements addressed whether TIVA is useful in paediatric anaesthesia, the importance of TIVA in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, its positive impact on the environment and effect on patient physiology, such as airway and haemodynamic control. Conclusions: Using the Delphi method, this international consensus showed that cost, lack of familiarity or training and the risk of delayed emergence are not considered obstacles to TIVA use. It appears, instead, that the primary motivations for its adoption are the impact of TIVA on patient experience, especially in paediatrics, and the benefit to the overall procedure outcome. The effect of TIVA on postoperative nausea and vomiting and patient physiology, as well as improving its availability in paediatrics were considered as priorities. We also identified areas where the debate remains open, generating new research questions on geographical variation and the potential impact of local availability of monitoring equipment. MDPI 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9225030/ /pubmed/35743557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123486 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Uitenbosch, Giulia
Sng, Daniel
Carvalho, Hugo N.
Cata, Juan P.
De Boer, Hans D.
Erdoes, Gabor
Heytens, Luc
Lois, Fernande Jane
Rousseau, Anne-Françoise
Pelosi, Paolo
Forget, Patrice
Nesvadba, David
Expert Multinational Consensus Statement for Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA) Using the Delphi Method †
title Expert Multinational Consensus Statement for Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA) Using the Delphi Method †
title_full Expert Multinational Consensus Statement for Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA) Using the Delphi Method †
title_fullStr Expert Multinational Consensus Statement for Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA) Using the Delphi Method †
title_full_unstemmed Expert Multinational Consensus Statement for Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA) Using the Delphi Method †
title_short Expert Multinational Consensus Statement for Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA) Using the Delphi Method †
title_sort expert multinational consensus statement for total intravenous anaesthesia (tiva) using the delphi method †
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123486
work_keys_str_mv AT uitenboschgiulia expertmultinationalconsensusstatementfortotalintravenousanaesthesiativausingthedelphimethod
AT sngdaniel expertmultinationalconsensusstatementfortotalintravenousanaesthesiativausingthedelphimethod
AT carvalhohugon expertmultinationalconsensusstatementfortotalintravenousanaesthesiativausingthedelphimethod
AT catajuanp expertmultinationalconsensusstatementfortotalintravenousanaesthesiativausingthedelphimethod
AT deboerhansd expertmultinationalconsensusstatementfortotalintravenousanaesthesiativausingthedelphimethod
AT erdoesgabor expertmultinationalconsensusstatementfortotalintravenousanaesthesiativausingthedelphimethod
AT heytensluc expertmultinationalconsensusstatementfortotalintravenousanaesthesiativausingthedelphimethod
AT loisfernandejane expertmultinationalconsensusstatementfortotalintravenousanaesthesiativausingthedelphimethod
AT rousseauannefrancoise expertmultinationalconsensusstatementfortotalintravenousanaesthesiativausingthedelphimethod
AT pelosipaolo expertmultinationalconsensusstatementfortotalintravenousanaesthesiativausingthedelphimethod
AT forgetpatrice expertmultinationalconsensusstatementfortotalintravenousanaesthesiativausingthedelphimethod
AT nesvadbadavid expertmultinationalconsensusstatementfortotalintravenousanaesthesiativausingthedelphimethod