Cargando…
Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study
Objective: Racial and ethnic disparities in peripartum blood loss and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) have not been adequately evaluated. We sought to compare postpartum blood loss and PPH in African American and Hispanic parturients compared to other groups. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of an...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35755558 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25299 |
_version_ | 1784733525756346368 |
---|---|
author | Katz, Daniel Khadge, Shradha Carvalho, Brendan |
author_facet | Katz, Daniel Khadge, Shradha Carvalho, Brendan |
author_sort | Katz, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Racial and ethnic disparities in peripartum blood loss and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) have not been adequately evaluated. We sought to compare postpartum blood loss and PPH in African American and Hispanic parturients compared to other groups. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of an observational study at a tertiary academic center of a historical (August 2016 to January 2017) and interventional (August 2017 to January 2018) cohort of 7618 deliveries. Visual estimation of blood loss (EBL) was used in the historical group and quantitative blood loss (QBL) was implemented in the intervention group. Our primary endpoint was median blood loss in African Americans versus other racial groups between cohorts. Results: A total of 7618 deliveries were evaluated; 755 (9.9%) were identified as African American with 1035 (13.6%) identifying as Hispanic. Blood loss was similar in racial groups using EBL (p=0.131), but not QBL that was 430 (227-771) in African Americans and 348 (200-612) in non-African Americans (p<0.001). PPH was greater among African Americans in both groups (10.3% vs. 6.9% in EBL cohort, p=0.023, and 16.9% vs. 11.6% in QBL cohort, p<0.001). Conclusion: Racial and ethnic differences in peripartum blood loss were more apparent with QBL than EBL. It is unknown if these differences are caused by provider cognitive bias, socioeconomic differences, language barriers and/or other factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9225058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92250582022-06-24 Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study Katz, Daniel Khadge, Shradha Carvalho, Brendan Cureus Anesthesiology Objective: Racial and ethnic disparities in peripartum blood loss and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) have not been adequately evaluated. We sought to compare postpartum blood loss and PPH in African American and Hispanic parturients compared to other groups. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of an observational study at a tertiary academic center of a historical (August 2016 to January 2017) and interventional (August 2017 to January 2018) cohort of 7618 deliveries. Visual estimation of blood loss (EBL) was used in the historical group and quantitative blood loss (QBL) was implemented in the intervention group. Our primary endpoint was median blood loss in African Americans versus other racial groups between cohorts. Results: A total of 7618 deliveries were evaluated; 755 (9.9%) were identified as African American with 1035 (13.6%) identifying as Hispanic. Blood loss was similar in racial groups using EBL (p=0.131), but not QBL that was 430 (227-771) in African Americans and 348 (200-612) in non-African Americans (p<0.001). PPH was greater among African Americans in both groups (10.3% vs. 6.9% in EBL cohort, p=0.023, and 16.9% vs. 11.6% in QBL cohort, p<0.001). Conclusion: Racial and ethnic differences in peripartum blood loss were more apparent with QBL than EBL. It is unknown if these differences are caused by provider cognitive bias, socioeconomic differences, language barriers and/or other factors. Cureus 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9225058/ /pubmed/35755558 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25299 Text en Copyright © 2022, Katz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Anesthesiology Katz, Daniel Khadge, Shradha Carvalho, Brendan Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study |
title | Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study |
title_full | Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study |
title_short | Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study |
title_sort | comparing postpartum estimated and quantified blood loss among racial groups: an observational study |
topic | Anesthesiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35755558 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katzdaniel comparingpostpartumestimatedandquantifiedbloodlossamongracialgroupsanobservationalstudy AT khadgeshradha comparingpostpartumestimatedandquantifiedbloodlossamongracialgroupsanobservationalstudy AT carvalhobrendan comparingpostpartumestimatedandquantifiedbloodlossamongracialgroupsanobservationalstudy |