Cargando…

Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study

Objective: Racial and ethnic disparities in peripartum blood loss and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) have not been adequately evaluated. We sought to compare postpartum blood loss and PPH in African American and Hispanic parturients compared to other groups. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katz, Daniel, Khadge, Shradha, Carvalho, Brendan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35755558
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25299
_version_ 1784733525756346368
author Katz, Daniel
Khadge, Shradha
Carvalho, Brendan
author_facet Katz, Daniel
Khadge, Shradha
Carvalho, Brendan
author_sort Katz, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Objective: Racial and ethnic disparities in peripartum blood loss and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) have not been adequately evaluated. We sought to compare postpartum blood loss and PPH in African American and Hispanic parturients compared to other groups. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of an observational study at a tertiary academic center of a historical (August 2016 to January 2017) and interventional (August 2017 to January 2018) cohort of 7618 deliveries. Visual estimation of blood loss (EBL) was used in the historical group and quantitative blood loss (QBL) was implemented in the intervention group. Our primary endpoint was median blood loss in African Americans versus other racial groups between cohorts. Results: A total of 7618 deliveries were evaluated; 755 (9.9%) were identified as African American with 1035 (13.6%) identifying as Hispanic. Blood loss was similar in racial groups using EBL (p=0.131), but not QBL that was 430 (227-771) in African Americans and 348 (200-612) in non-African Americans (p<0.001). PPH was greater among African Americans in both groups (10.3% vs. 6.9% in EBL cohort, p=0.023, and 16.9% vs. 11.6% in QBL cohort, p<0.001). Conclusion: Racial and ethnic differences in peripartum blood loss were more apparent with QBL than EBL. It is unknown if these differences are caused by provider cognitive bias, socioeconomic differences, language barriers and/or other factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9225058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92250582022-06-24 Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study Katz, Daniel Khadge, Shradha Carvalho, Brendan Cureus Anesthesiology Objective: Racial and ethnic disparities in peripartum blood loss and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) have not been adequately evaluated. We sought to compare postpartum blood loss and PPH in African American and Hispanic parturients compared to other groups. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of an observational study at a tertiary academic center of a historical (August 2016 to January 2017) and interventional (August 2017 to January 2018) cohort of 7618 deliveries. Visual estimation of blood loss (EBL) was used in the historical group and quantitative blood loss (QBL) was implemented in the intervention group. Our primary endpoint was median blood loss in African Americans versus other racial groups between cohorts. Results: A total of 7618 deliveries were evaluated; 755 (9.9%) were identified as African American with 1035 (13.6%) identifying as Hispanic. Blood loss was similar in racial groups using EBL (p=0.131), but not QBL that was 430 (227-771) in African Americans and 348 (200-612) in non-African Americans (p<0.001). PPH was greater among African Americans in both groups (10.3% vs. 6.9% in EBL cohort, p=0.023, and 16.9% vs. 11.6% in QBL cohort, p<0.001). Conclusion: Racial and ethnic differences in peripartum blood loss were more apparent with QBL than EBL. It is unknown if these differences are caused by provider cognitive bias, socioeconomic differences, language barriers and/or other factors. Cureus 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9225058/ /pubmed/35755558 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25299 Text en Copyright © 2022, Katz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Katz, Daniel
Khadge, Shradha
Carvalho, Brendan
Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study
title Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study
title_full Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study
title_fullStr Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study
title_short Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study
title_sort comparing postpartum estimated and quantified blood loss among racial groups: an observational study
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35755558
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25299
work_keys_str_mv AT katzdaniel comparingpostpartumestimatedandquantifiedbloodlossamongracialgroupsanobservationalstudy
AT khadgeshradha comparingpostpartumestimatedandquantifiedbloodlossamongracialgroupsanobservationalstudy
AT carvalhobrendan comparingpostpartumestimatedandquantifiedbloodlossamongracialgroupsanobservationalstudy