Cargando…
The Role of ICG in Robot-Assisted Liver Resections
Introduction: Robotic-assisted liver surgery (RALS) with its known limitations is gaining more importance. The fluorescent dye, indocyanine green (ICG), is a way to overcome some of these limitations. It accumulates in or around hepatic masses. The integrated near-infrared cameras help to visualize...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743595 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123527 |
_version_ | 1784733529835307008 |
---|---|
author | Mehdorn, Anne-Sophie Richter, Florian Hess, Katharina Beckmann, Jan Henrik Egberts, Jan-Hendrik Linecker, Michael Becker, Thomas Braun, Felix |
author_facet | Mehdorn, Anne-Sophie Richter, Florian Hess, Katharina Beckmann, Jan Henrik Egberts, Jan-Hendrik Linecker, Michael Becker, Thomas Braun, Felix |
author_sort | Mehdorn, Anne-Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Robotic-assisted liver surgery (RALS) with its known limitations is gaining more importance. The fluorescent dye, indocyanine green (ICG), is a way to overcome some of these limitations. It accumulates in or around hepatic masses. The integrated near-infrared cameras help to visualize this accumulation. We aimed to compare the influence of ICG staining on the surgical and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing RALS. Material and Methods: Patients who underwent RALS between 2014 and 2021 at the Department of General Surgery at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, were included. In 2019, ICG-supported RALS was introduced. Results: Fifty-four patients were included, with twenty-eight patients (50.9%) receiving preoperative ICG. Hepatocellular carcinoma (32.1%) was the main entity resected, followed by the metastasis of colorectal cancers (17%) and focal nodular hyperplasia (15.1%). ICG staining worked for different tumor entities, but diffuse staining was noted in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, ICG-supported RALS lasted shorter (142.7 ± 61.8 min vs. 246.4 ± 98.6 min, p < 0.001), tumors resected in the ICG cohort were significantly smaller (27.1 ± 25.0 mm vs. 47.6 ± 35.2 mm, p = 0.021) and more R0 resections were achieved by ICG-supported RALS (96.3% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.075). Conclusions: ICG-supported RALS achieve surgically and oncologically safe results, while overcoming the limitations of RALS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9225074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92250742022-06-24 The Role of ICG in Robot-Assisted Liver Resections Mehdorn, Anne-Sophie Richter, Florian Hess, Katharina Beckmann, Jan Henrik Egberts, Jan-Hendrik Linecker, Michael Becker, Thomas Braun, Felix J Clin Med Article Introduction: Robotic-assisted liver surgery (RALS) with its known limitations is gaining more importance. The fluorescent dye, indocyanine green (ICG), is a way to overcome some of these limitations. It accumulates in or around hepatic masses. The integrated near-infrared cameras help to visualize this accumulation. We aimed to compare the influence of ICG staining on the surgical and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing RALS. Material and Methods: Patients who underwent RALS between 2014 and 2021 at the Department of General Surgery at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, were included. In 2019, ICG-supported RALS was introduced. Results: Fifty-four patients were included, with twenty-eight patients (50.9%) receiving preoperative ICG. Hepatocellular carcinoma (32.1%) was the main entity resected, followed by the metastasis of colorectal cancers (17%) and focal nodular hyperplasia (15.1%). ICG staining worked for different tumor entities, but diffuse staining was noted in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, ICG-supported RALS lasted shorter (142.7 ± 61.8 min vs. 246.4 ± 98.6 min, p < 0.001), tumors resected in the ICG cohort were significantly smaller (27.1 ± 25.0 mm vs. 47.6 ± 35.2 mm, p = 0.021) and more R0 resections were achieved by ICG-supported RALS (96.3% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.075). Conclusions: ICG-supported RALS achieve surgically and oncologically safe results, while overcoming the limitations of RALS. MDPI 2022-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9225074/ /pubmed/35743595 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123527 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mehdorn, Anne-Sophie Richter, Florian Hess, Katharina Beckmann, Jan Henrik Egberts, Jan-Hendrik Linecker, Michael Becker, Thomas Braun, Felix The Role of ICG in Robot-Assisted Liver Resections |
title | The Role of ICG in Robot-Assisted Liver Resections |
title_full | The Role of ICG in Robot-Assisted Liver Resections |
title_fullStr | The Role of ICG in Robot-Assisted Liver Resections |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of ICG in Robot-Assisted Liver Resections |
title_short | The Role of ICG in Robot-Assisted Liver Resections |
title_sort | role of icg in robot-assisted liver resections |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743595 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123527 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehdornannesophie theroleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT richterflorian theroleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT hesskatharina theroleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT beckmannjanhenrik theroleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT egbertsjanhendrik theroleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT lineckermichael theroleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT beckerthomas theroleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT braunfelix theroleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT mehdornannesophie roleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT richterflorian roleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT hesskatharina roleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT beckmannjanhenrik roleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT egbertsjanhendrik roleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT lineckermichael roleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT beckerthomas roleoficginrobotassistedliverresections AT braunfelix roleoficginrobotassistedliverresections |