Cargando…

Searching for Life, Mindful of Lyfe’s Possibilities

We are embarking on a new age of astrobiology, one in which numerous interplanetary missions and telescopes will be designed, built, and launched with the explicit goal of finding evidence for life beyond Earth. Such a profound aim warrants caution and responsibility when interpreting and disseminat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Michael L., Bartlett, Stuart, Chen, Sihe, Tierney, Louisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743813
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12060783
_version_ 1784733534916706304
author Wong, Michael L.
Bartlett, Stuart
Chen, Sihe
Tierney, Louisa
author_facet Wong, Michael L.
Bartlett, Stuart
Chen, Sihe
Tierney, Louisa
author_sort Wong, Michael L.
collection PubMed
description We are embarking on a new age of astrobiology, one in which numerous interplanetary missions and telescopes will be designed, built, and launched with the explicit goal of finding evidence for life beyond Earth. Such a profound aim warrants caution and responsibility when interpreting and disseminating results. Scientists must take care not to overstate (or over-imply) confidence in life detection when evidence is lacking, or only incremental advances have been made. Recently, there has been a call for the community to create standards of evidence for the detection and reporting of biosignatures. In this perspective, we wish to highlight a critical but often understated element to the discussion of biosignatures: Life detection studies are deeply entwined with and rely upon our (often preconceived) notions of what life is, the origins of life, and habitability. Where biosignatures are concerned, these three highly related questions are frequently relegated to a low priority, assumed to be already solved or irrelevant to the question of life detection. Therefore, our aim is to bring to the fore how these other major astrobiological frontiers are central to searching for life elsewhere and encourage astrobiologists to embrace the reality that all of these science questions are interrelated and must be furthered together rather than separately. Finally, in an effort to be more inclusive of life as we do not know it, we propose tentative criteria for a more general and expansive characterization of habitability that we call genesity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9225093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92250932022-06-24 Searching for Life, Mindful of Lyfe’s Possibilities Wong, Michael L. Bartlett, Stuart Chen, Sihe Tierney, Louisa Life (Basel) Perspective We are embarking on a new age of astrobiology, one in which numerous interplanetary missions and telescopes will be designed, built, and launched with the explicit goal of finding evidence for life beyond Earth. Such a profound aim warrants caution and responsibility when interpreting and disseminating results. Scientists must take care not to overstate (or over-imply) confidence in life detection when evidence is lacking, or only incremental advances have been made. Recently, there has been a call for the community to create standards of evidence for the detection and reporting of biosignatures. In this perspective, we wish to highlight a critical but often understated element to the discussion of biosignatures: Life detection studies are deeply entwined with and rely upon our (often preconceived) notions of what life is, the origins of life, and habitability. Where biosignatures are concerned, these three highly related questions are frequently relegated to a low priority, assumed to be already solved or irrelevant to the question of life detection. Therefore, our aim is to bring to the fore how these other major astrobiological frontiers are central to searching for life elsewhere and encourage astrobiologists to embrace the reality that all of these science questions are interrelated and must be furthered together rather than separately. Finally, in an effort to be more inclusive of life as we do not know it, we propose tentative criteria for a more general and expansive characterization of habitability that we call genesity. MDPI 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9225093/ /pubmed/35743813 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12060783 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Perspective
Wong, Michael L.
Bartlett, Stuart
Chen, Sihe
Tierney, Louisa
Searching for Life, Mindful of Lyfe’s Possibilities
title Searching for Life, Mindful of Lyfe’s Possibilities
title_full Searching for Life, Mindful of Lyfe’s Possibilities
title_fullStr Searching for Life, Mindful of Lyfe’s Possibilities
title_full_unstemmed Searching for Life, Mindful of Lyfe’s Possibilities
title_short Searching for Life, Mindful of Lyfe’s Possibilities
title_sort searching for life, mindful of lyfe’s possibilities
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743813
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12060783
work_keys_str_mv AT wongmichaell searchingforlifemindfuloflyfespossibilities
AT bartlettstuart searchingforlifemindfuloflyfespossibilities
AT chensihe searchingforlifemindfuloflyfespossibilities
AT tierneylouisa searchingforlifemindfuloflyfespossibilities