Cargando…

Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study

Background: Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed plastic surgery procedures. Providing patients with realistic 3D simulations of breast augmentation outcomes is becoming increasingly common. Until recently, such programs were expensive and required significant equipment, train...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: La Padula, Simone, Pensato, Rosita, D’Andrea, Francesco, de Gregorio, Ludovica, Errico, Concetta, Rega, Umberto, Canta, Luigi, Pizza, Chiara, Roccaro, Giovanni, Billon, Raphaelle, Dibra, Endri, Meningaud, Jean Paul, Hersant, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743534
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123464
_version_ 1784733543434289152
author La Padula, Simone
Pensato, Rosita
D’Andrea, Francesco
de Gregorio, Ludovica
Errico, Concetta
Rega, Umberto
Canta, Luigi
Pizza, Chiara
Roccaro, Giovanni
Billon, Raphaelle
Dibra, Endri
Meningaud, Jean Paul
Hersant, Barbara
author_facet La Padula, Simone
Pensato, Rosita
D’Andrea, Francesco
de Gregorio, Ludovica
Errico, Concetta
Rega, Umberto
Canta, Luigi
Pizza, Chiara
Roccaro, Giovanni
Billon, Raphaelle
Dibra, Endri
Meningaud, Jean Paul
Hersant, Barbara
author_sort La Padula, Simone
collection PubMed
description Background: Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed plastic surgery procedures. Providing patients with realistic 3D simulations of breast augmentation outcomes is becoming increasingly common. Until recently, such programs were expensive and required significant equipment, training, and office space. New simple user-friendly programs have been developed, but to date there remains a paucity of objective evidence comparing these 3D simulations with post-operative outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess the aesthetic similarity between a pre-operative 3D simulation generated using Arbrea breast simulation software and real post-operative outcomes, with a focus on patient satisfaction. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective study of patients requiring breast augmentation. Patients were asked to assess how realistic the simulation was compared to the one-year post-operative result using the authors’ grading scale for breast augmentation simulation assessment. Patient satisfaction with the simulations was assessed using a satisfaction visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). Patient satisfaction with the surgical outcome was assessed using the BREAST-Q Augmentation Module. Results: All patients were satisfied with the simulations and with the attained breast volume, with a mean VAS score of 8.2 ± 1.2. The mean simulation time took 90 s on average. The differences between the pre-operative and one-year post-operative values of the three BREAST-Q assessments were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Three-dimensional simulation is becoming increasingly common in pre-operative planning for breast augmentation. The present study aimed to assess the degree of similarity of three-dimensional simulations generated using Arbrea Breast Software and found that the use of the software provided a very satisfying representation for patients undergoing breast augmentation. However, we recommend informing patients that only the volume simulation is extremely accurate. On the other hand, it is necessary to not guarantee an absolute correspondence regarding the breast shape between the simulation and the post-operative result.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9225128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92251282022-06-24 Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study La Padula, Simone Pensato, Rosita D’Andrea, Francesco de Gregorio, Ludovica Errico, Concetta Rega, Umberto Canta, Luigi Pizza, Chiara Roccaro, Giovanni Billon, Raphaelle Dibra, Endri Meningaud, Jean Paul Hersant, Barbara J Clin Med Article Background: Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed plastic surgery procedures. Providing patients with realistic 3D simulations of breast augmentation outcomes is becoming increasingly common. Until recently, such programs were expensive and required significant equipment, training, and office space. New simple user-friendly programs have been developed, but to date there remains a paucity of objective evidence comparing these 3D simulations with post-operative outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess the aesthetic similarity between a pre-operative 3D simulation generated using Arbrea breast simulation software and real post-operative outcomes, with a focus on patient satisfaction. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective study of patients requiring breast augmentation. Patients were asked to assess how realistic the simulation was compared to the one-year post-operative result using the authors’ grading scale for breast augmentation simulation assessment. Patient satisfaction with the simulations was assessed using a satisfaction visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). Patient satisfaction with the surgical outcome was assessed using the BREAST-Q Augmentation Module. Results: All patients were satisfied with the simulations and with the attained breast volume, with a mean VAS score of 8.2 ± 1.2. The mean simulation time took 90 s on average. The differences between the pre-operative and one-year post-operative values of the three BREAST-Q assessments were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Three-dimensional simulation is becoming increasingly common in pre-operative planning for breast augmentation. The present study aimed to assess the degree of similarity of three-dimensional simulations generated using Arbrea Breast Software and found that the use of the software provided a very satisfying representation for patients undergoing breast augmentation. However, we recommend informing patients that only the volume simulation is extremely accurate. On the other hand, it is necessary to not guarantee an absolute correspondence regarding the breast shape between the simulation and the post-operative result. MDPI 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9225128/ /pubmed/35743534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123464 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
La Padula, Simone
Pensato, Rosita
D’Andrea, Francesco
de Gregorio, Ludovica
Errico, Concetta
Rega, Umberto
Canta, Luigi
Pizza, Chiara
Roccaro, Giovanni
Billon, Raphaelle
Dibra, Endri
Meningaud, Jean Paul
Hersant, Barbara
Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study
title Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study
title_full Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study
title_fullStr Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study
title_short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study
title_sort assessment of patient satisfaction using a new augmented reality simulation software for breast augmentation: a prospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743534
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123464
work_keys_str_mv AT lapadulasimone assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy
AT pensatorosita assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy
AT dandreafrancesco assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy
AT degregorioludovica assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy
AT erricoconcetta assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy
AT regaumberto assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy
AT cantaluigi assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy
AT pizzachiara assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy
AT roccarogiovanni assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy
AT billonraphaelle assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy
AT dibraendri assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy
AT meningaudjeanpaul assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy
AT hersantbarbara assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy