Cargando…
Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study
Background: Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed plastic surgery procedures. Providing patients with realistic 3D simulations of breast augmentation outcomes is becoming increasingly common. Until recently, such programs were expensive and required significant equipment, train...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123464 |
_version_ | 1784733543434289152 |
---|---|
author | La Padula, Simone Pensato, Rosita D’Andrea, Francesco de Gregorio, Ludovica Errico, Concetta Rega, Umberto Canta, Luigi Pizza, Chiara Roccaro, Giovanni Billon, Raphaelle Dibra, Endri Meningaud, Jean Paul Hersant, Barbara |
author_facet | La Padula, Simone Pensato, Rosita D’Andrea, Francesco de Gregorio, Ludovica Errico, Concetta Rega, Umberto Canta, Luigi Pizza, Chiara Roccaro, Giovanni Billon, Raphaelle Dibra, Endri Meningaud, Jean Paul Hersant, Barbara |
author_sort | La Padula, Simone |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed plastic surgery procedures. Providing patients with realistic 3D simulations of breast augmentation outcomes is becoming increasingly common. Until recently, such programs were expensive and required significant equipment, training, and office space. New simple user-friendly programs have been developed, but to date there remains a paucity of objective evidence comparing these 3D simulations with post-operative outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess the aesthetic similarity between a pre-operative 3D simulation generated using Arbrea breast simulation software and real post-operative outcomes, with a focus on patient satisfaction. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective study of patients requiring breast augmentation. Patients were asked to assess how realistic the simulation was compared to the one-year post-operative result using the authors’ grading scale for breast augmentation simulation assessment. Patient satisfaction with the simulations was assessed using a satisfaction visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). Patient satisfaction with the surgical outcome was assessed using the BREAST-Q Augmentation Module. Results: All patients were satisfied with the simulations and with the attained breast volume, with a mean VAS score of 8.2 ± 1.2. The mean simulation time took 90 s on average. The differences between the pre-operative and one-year post-operative values of the three BREAST-Q assessments were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Three-dimensional simulation is becoming increasingly common in pre-operative planning for breast augmentation. The present study aimed to assess the degree of similarity of three-dimensional simulations generated using Arbrea Breast Software and found that the use of the software provided a very satisfying representation for patients undergoing breast augmentation. However, we recommend informing patients that only the volume simulation is extremely accurate. On the other hand, it is necessary to not guarantee an absolute correspondence regarding the breast shape between the simulation and the post-operative result. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9225128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92251282022-06-24 Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study La Padula, Simone Pensato, Rosita D’Andrea, Francesco de Gregorio, Ludovica Errico, Concetta Rega, Umberto Canta, Luigi Pizza, Chiara Roccaro, Giovanni Billon, Raphaelle Dibra, Endri Meningaud, Jean Paul Hersant, Barbara J Clin Med Article Background: Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed plastic surgery procedures. Providing patients with realistic 3D simulations of breast augmentation outcomes is becoming increasingly common. Until recently, such programs were expensive and required significant equipment, training, and office space. New simple user-friendly programs have been developed, but to date there remains a paucity of objective evidence comparing these 3D simulations with post-operative outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess the aesthetic similarity between a pre-operative 3D simulation generated using Arbrea breast simulation software and real post-operative outcomes, with a focus on patient satisfaction. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective study of patients requiring breast augmentation. Patients were asked to assess how realistic the simulation was compared to the one-year post-operative result using the authors’ grading scale for breast augmentation simulation assessment. Patient satisfaction with the simulations was assessed using a satisfaction visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). Patient satisfaction with the surgical outcome was assessed using the BREAST-Q Augmentation Module. Results: All patients were satisfied with the simulations and with the attained breast volume, with a mean VAS score of 8.2 ± 1.2. The mean simulation time took 90 s on average. The differences between the pre-operative and one-year post-operative values of the three BREAST-Q assessments were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Three-dimensional simulation is becoming increasingly common in pre-operative planning for breast augmentation. The present study aimed to assess the degree of similarity of three-dimensional simulations generated using Arbrea Breast Software and found that the use of the software provided a very satisfying representation for patients undergoing breast augmentation. However, we recommend informing patients that only the volume simulation is extremely accurate. On the other hand, it is necessary to not guarantee an absolute correspondence regarding the breast shape between the simulation and the post-operative result. MDPI 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9225128/ /pubmed/35743534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123464 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article La Padula, Simone Pensato, Rosita D’Andrea, Francesco de Gregorio, Ludovica Errico, Concetta Rega, Umberto Canta, Luigi Pizza, Chiara Roccaro, Giovanni Billon, Raphaelle Dibra, Endri Meningaud, Jean Paul Hersant, Barbara Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study |
title | Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study |
title_full | Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study |
title_short | Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study |
title_sort | assessment of patient satisfaction using a new augmented reality simulation software for breast augmentation: a prospective study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123464 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lapadulasimone assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy AT pensatorosita assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy AT dandreafrancesco assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy AT degregorioludovica assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy AT erricoconcetta assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy AT regaumberto assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy AT cantaluigi assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy AT pizzachiara assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy AT roccarogiovanni assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy AT billonraphaelle assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy AT dibraendri assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy AT meningaudjeanpaul assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy AT hersantbarbara assessmentofpatientsatisfactionusinganewaugmentedrealitysimulationsoftwareforbreastaugmentationaprospectivestudy |