Cargando…

Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization

Background: Caustic ingestion has gained increasing attention worldwide. However, the insight into whether to use esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or computed tomography (CT) for first-line investigation remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate a diagnostic and management algorithm that c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yu-Jhou, Seak, Chen-June, Cheng, Hao-Tsai, Chen, Chien-Cheng, Chen, Tsung-Hsing, Sung, Chang-Mu, Ng, Chip-Jin, Kang, Shih-Ching, Su, Ming-Yao, Hsieh, Sen-Yung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743772
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060989
_version_ 1784733599026642944
author Chen, Yu-Jhou
Seak, Chen-June
Cheng, Hao-Tsai
Chen, Chien-Cheng
Chen, Tsung-Hsing
Sung, Chang-Mu
Ng, Chip-Jin
Kang, Shih-Ching
Su, Ming-Yao
Hsieh, Sen-Yung
author_facet Chen, Yu-Jhou
Seak, Chen-June
Cheng, Hao-Tsai
Chen, Chien-Cheng
Chen, Tsung-Hsing
Sung, Chang-Mu
Ng, Chip-Jin
Kang, Shih-Ching
Su, Ming-Yao
Hsieh, Sen-Yung
author_sort Chen, Yu-Jhou
collection PubMed
description Background: Caustic ingestion has gained increasing attention worldwide. However, the insight into whether to use esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or computed tomography (CT) for first-line investigation remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate a diagnostic and management algorithm that combines EGD and CT for rapid triage. Methods: We established an algorithm for our hospital in 2013, aiming to maximize the benefits and minimize the limitations of EGD and CT. Then, we retrospectively analyzed the 163 enrolled patients treated between 2014 and 2019 and categorized them into 4 groups: A = 3 (1.8%): with perforation signs and directly confirmed by CT, B = 10 (6.1%): clinically suspected perforation but not initially proven by CT, C = 91 (55.8%): initial perforation less favored but with EGD grade ≥ 2b or GI/systemic complications, and D = 59 (36.2%): clinically stable with EGD grade ≤ 2a, according to initial signs/symptoms and EGD/CT grading. The morbidity and mortality of each group were analyzed. The predictive values of EGD and CT were examined by logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The outcomes of such algorithm were reported. CT was imperative for patients with toxic signs and suspected perforation. For non-emergent operations, additional EGD was safe and helpful in identifying surgical necessity. For patients with an initially low perforation risk, EGD alone sufficiently determined admission necessity. Among inpatients, EGD provided excellent discrimination for predicting the risk for signs/symptoms’ deterioration. Routine additional CT was only beneficial for those with deteriorating signs/symptoms. Conclusions: According to the analyses, initial signs/symptoms help to choose EGD or CT as the first-line investigative tool in caustic patients. CT is necessary for seriously injured patients, but it cannot replace EGD for moderate/mild injuries. The severity stratification and patient categorization help to simplify complex scenarios, accelerate decision-making, and prevent unnecessary intervention/therapy. External validation in a larger sample size is further indicated for this algorithm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9225358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92253582022-06-24 Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization Chen, Yu-Jhou Seak, Chen-June Cheng, Hao-Tsai Chen, Chien-Cheng Chen, Tsung-Hsing Sung, Chang-Mu Ng, Chip-Jin Kang, Shih-Ching Su, Ming-Yao Hsieh, Sen-Yung J Pers Med Article Background: Caustic ingestion has gained increasing attention worldwide. However, the insight into whether to use esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or computed tomography (CT) for first-line investigation remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate a diagnostic and management algorithm that combines EGD and CT for rapid triage. Methods: We established an algorithm for our hospital in 2013, aiming to maximize the benefits and minimize the limitations of EGD and CT. Then, we retrospectively analyzed the 163 enrolled patients treated between 2014 and 2019 and categorized them into 4 groups: A = 3 (1.8%): with perforation signs and directly confirmed by CT, B = 10 (6.1%): clinically suspected perforation but not initially proven by CT, C = 91 (55.8%): initial perforation less favored but with EGD grade ≥ 2b or GI/systemic complications, and D = 59 (36.2%): clinically stable with EGD grade ≤ 2a, according to initial signs/symptoms and EGD/CT grading. The morbidity and mortality of each group were analyzed. The predictive values of EGD and CT were examined by logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The outcomes of such algorithm were reported. CT was imperative for patients with toxic signs and suspected perforation. For non-emergent operations, additional EGD was safe and helpful in identifying surgical necessity. For patients with an initially low perforation risk, EGD alone sufficiently determined admission necessity. Among inpatients, EGD provided excellent discrimination for predicting the risk for signs/symptoms’ deterioration. Routine additional CT was only beneficial for those with deteriorating signs/symptoms. Conclusions: According to the analyses, initial signs/symptoms help to choose EGD or CT as the first-line investigative tool in caustic patients. CT is necessary for seriously injured patients, but it cannot replace EGD for moderate/mild injuries. The severity stratification and patient categorization help to simplify complex scenarios, accelerate decision-making, and prevent unnecessary intervention/therapy. External validation in a larger sample size is further indicated for this algorithm. MDPI 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9225358/ /pubmed/35743772 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060989 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Yu-Jhou
Seak, Chen-June
Cheng, Hao-Tsai
Chen, Chien-Cheng
Chen, Tsung-Hsing
Sung, Chang-Mu
Ng, Chip-Jin
Kang, Shih-Ching
Su, Ming-Yao
Hsieh, Sen-Yung
Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization
title Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization
title_full Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization
title_short Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization
title_sort evaluation of a diagnostic and management algorithm for adult caustic ingestion: new concept of severity stratification and patient categorization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743772
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060989
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyujhou evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization
AT seakchenjune evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization
AT chenghaotsai evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization
AT chenchiencheng evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization
AT chentsunghsing evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization
AT sungchangmu evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization
AT ngchipjin evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization
AT kangshihching evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization
AT sumingyao evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization
AT hsiehsenyung evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization