Cargando…
Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization
Background: Caustic ingestion has gained increasing attention worldwide. However, the insight into whether to use esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or computed tomography (CT) for first-line investigation remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate a diagnostic and management algorithm that c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743772 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060989 |
_version_ | 1784733599026642944 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yu-Jhou Seak, Chen-June Cheng, Hao-Tsai Chen, Chien-Cheng Chen, Tsung-Hsing Sung, Chang-Mu Ng, Chip-Jin Kang, Shih-Ching Su, Ming-Yao Hsieh, Sen-Yung |
author_facet | Chen, Yu-Jhou Seak, Chen-June Cheng, Hao-Tsai Chen, Chien-Cheng Chen, Tsung-Hsing Sung, Chang-Mu Ng, Chip-Jin Kang, Shih-Ching Su, Ming-Yao Hsieh, Sen-Yung |
author_sort | Chen, Yu-Jhou |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Caustic ingestion has gained increasing attention worldwide. However, the insight into whether to use esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or computed tomography (CT) for first-line investigation remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate a diagnostic and management algorithm that combines EGD and CT for rapid triage. Methods: We established an algorithm for our hospital in 2013, aiming to maximize the benefits and minimize the limitations of EGD and CT. Then, we retrospectively analyzed the 163 enrolled patients treated between 2014 and 2019 and categorized them into 4 groups: A = 3 (1.8%): with perforation signs and directly confirmed by CT, B = 10 (6.1%): clinically suspected perforation but not initially proven by CT, C = 91 (55.8%): initial perforation less favored but with EGD grade ≥ 2b or GI/systemic complications, and D = 59 (36.2%): clinically stable with EGD grade ≤ 2a, according to initial signs/symptoms and EGD/CT grading. The morbidity and mortality of each group were analyzed. The predictive values of EGD and CT were examined by logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The outcomes of such algorithm were reported. CT was imperative for patients with toxic signs and suspected perforation. For non-emergent operations, additional EGD was safe and helpful in identifying surgical necessity. For patients with an initially low perforation risk, EGD alone sufficiently determined admission necessity. Among inpatients, EGD provided excellent discrimination for predicting the risk for signs/symptoms’ deterioration. Routine additional CT was only beneficial for those with deteriorating signs/symptoms. Conclusions: According to the analyses, initial signs/symptoms help to choose EGD or CT as the first-line investigative tool in caustic patients. CT is necessary for seriously injured patients, but it cannot replace EGD for moderate/mild injuries. The severity stratification and patient categorization help to simplify complex scenarios, accelerate decision-making, and prevent unnecessary intervention/therapy. External validation in a larger sample size is further indicated for this algorithm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9225358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92253582022-06-24 Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization Chen, Yu-Jhou Seak, Chen-June Cheng, Hao-Tsai Chen, Chien-Cheng Chen, Tsung-Hsing Sung, Chang-Mu Ng, Chip-Jin Kang, Shih-Ching Su, Ming-Yao Hsieh, Sen-Yung J Pers Med Article Background: Caustic ingestion has gained increasing attention worldwide. However, the insight into whether to use esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or computed tomography (CT) for first-line investigation remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate a diagnostic and management algorithm that combines EGD and CT for rapid triage. Methods: We established an algorithm for our hospital in 2013, aiming to maximize the benefits and minimize the limitations of EGD and CT. Then, we retrospectively analyzed the 163 enrolled patients treated between 2014 and 2019 and categorized them into 4 groups: A = 3 (1.8%): with perforation signs and directly confirmed by CT, B = 10 (6.1%): clinically suspected perforation but not initially proven by CT, C = 91 (55.8%): initial perforation less favored but with EGD grade ≥ 2b or GI/systemic complications, and D = 59 (36.2%): clinically stable with EGD grade ≤ 2a, according to initial signs/symptoms and EGD/CT grading. The morbidity and mortality of each group were analyzed. The predictive values of EGD and CT were examined by logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The outcomes of such algorithm were reported. CT was imperative for patients with toxic signs and suspected perforation. For non-emergent operations, additional EGD was safe and helpful in identifying surgical necessity. For patients with an initially low perforation risk, EGD alone sufficiently determined admission necessity. Among inpatients, EGD provided excellent discrimination for predicting the risk for signs/symptoms’ deterioration. Routine additional CT was only beneficial for those with deteriorating signs/symptoms. Conclusions: According to the analyses, initial signs/symptoms help to choose EGD or CT as the first-line investigative tool in caustic patients. CT is necessary for seriously injured patients, but it cannot replace EGD for moderate/mild injuries. The severity stratification and patient categorization help to simplify complex scenarios, accelerate decision-making, and prevent unnecessary intervention/therapy. External validation in a larger sample size is further indicated for this algorithm. MDPI 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9225358/ /pubmed/35743772 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060989 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chen, Yu-Jhou Seak, Chen-June Cheng, Hao-Tsai Chen, Chien-Cheng Chen, Tsung-Hsing Sung, Chang-Mu Ng, Chip-Jin Kang, Shih-Ching Su, Ming-Yao Hsieh, Sen-Yung Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization |
title | Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization |
title_full | Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization |
title_short | Evaluation of a Diagnostic and Management Algorithm for Adult Caustic Ingestion: New Concept of Severity Stratification and Patient Categorization |
title_sort | evaluation of a diagnostic and management algorithm for adult caustic ingestion: new concept of severity stratification and patient categorization |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743772 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060989 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyujhou evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization AT seakchenjune evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization AT chenghaotsai evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization AT chenchiencheng evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization AT chentsunghsing evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization AT sungchangmu evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization AT ngchipjin evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization AT kangshihching evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization AT sumingyao evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization AT hsiehsenyung evaluationofadiagnosticandmanagementalgorithmforadultcausticingestionnewconceptofseveritystratificationandpatientcategorization |