Cargando…
Comparison of the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Tablet for the Induction of Labor in Primipara: A Retrospective Cohort Study
This retrospective study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of Prostin E2 and Propess for the induction of labor (IOL) in nulliparous women between January 2018 and October 2021. The inclusion criteria were nulliparous, singleton, >37 weeks’ gestation, cephalic presentation with an unfavora...
Autores principales: | Ting, Ning-Shiuan, Ding, Dah-Ching, Wei, Yu-Chi |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743589 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123519 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome
por: Mlodawski, Jakub, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor
por: Bhatia, Anju, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labor in Women with Low-Risk Pregnancies: A Prospective Study
por: Anh, Nguyen Duy, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Comparison of Obstetric Outcomes Between Controlled-Release Dinoprostone Vaginal Delivery System (PROPESS) and Administration of Oral Dinoprostone for Labor Induction in Multiparous Women at Term
por: Yokoyama, Nobuko, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Induction of Labor at Term with Oral Misoprostol or as a Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert – A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
por: Beyer, Jana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)