Cargando…

Robotic Single-Site Plus Two-Port Myomectomy versus Conventional Robotic Multi-Port Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background: Robotic single-site plus two port myomectomy (RSTM) was designed to reduce the number of incision sites while retaining the advantage of conventional robotic multi-port myomectomy (CRM). This study aimed to explicate RSTM and compare surgical outcomes between it and CRM. Methods: The med...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Won, Seyeon, Choi, Su Hyeon, Lee, Nara, Shim, So Hyun, Kim, Mi Kyoung, Kim, Mi-La, Jung, Yong Wook, Yun, Bo Seong, Seong, Seok Ju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743713
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060928
_version_ 1784733667063496704
author Won, Seyeon
Choi, Su Hyeon
Lee, Nara
Shim, So Hyun
Kim, Mi Kyoung
Kim, Mi-La
Jung, Yong Wook
Yun, Bo Seong
Seong, Seok Ju
author_facet Won, Seyeon
Choi, Su Hyeon
Lee, Nara
Shim, So Hyun
Kim, Mi Kyoung
Kim, Mi-La
Jung, Yong Wook
Yun, Bo Seong
Seong, Seok Ju
author_sort Won, Seyeon
collection PubMed
description Background: Robotic single-site plus two port myomectomy (RSTM) was designed to reduce the number of incision sites while retaining the advantage of conventional robotic multi-port myomectomy (CRM). This study aimed to explicate RSTM and compare surgical outcomes between it and CRM. Methods: The medical records of 146 patients who had undergone RSTM and 173 who had undergone CRM were reviewed. The surgical outcomes between them were compared by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Results: The PSM analysis showed no statistically significant inter-group differences in patient characteristics. With regard to surgical outcomes, the RSTM group enjoyed shorter operative time (148.30 ± 44.8 vs. 162.3 ± 47.4 min, p = 0.011), less hemoglobin decrement (1.8 ± 0.9 vs. 2.3 ± 1.0 g/dL, p < 0.001), and shorter duration of hospital stay (5.4 ± 0.7 vs. 5.8 ± 0.7 days, p < 0.001). Conclusions: RSTM was associated with shorter operative time relative to CRM. Further prospective studies are needed in order to more fully investigate the advantages of RSTM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9225652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92256522022-06-24 Robotic Single-Site Plus Two-Port Myomectomy versus Conventional Robotic Multi-Port Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Won, Seyeon Choi, Su Hyeon Lee, Nara Shim, So Hyun Kim, Mi Kyoung Kim, Mi-La Jung, Yong Wook Yun, Bo Seong Seong, Seok Ju J Pers Med Article Background: Robotic single-site plus two port myomectomy (RSTM) was designed to reduce the number of incision sites while retaining the advantage of conventional robotic multi-port myomectomy (CRM). This study aimed to explicate RSTM and compare surgical outcomes between it and CRM. Methods: The medical records of 146 patients who had undergone RSTM and 173 who had undergone CRM were reviewed. The surgical outcomes between them were compared by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Results: The PSM analysis showed no statistically significant inter-group differences in patient characteristics. With regard to surgical outcomes, the RSTM group enjoyed shorter operative time (148.30 ± 44.8 vs. 162.3 ± 47.4 min, p = 0.011), less hemoglobin decrement (1.8 ± 0.9 vs. 2.3 ± 1.0 g/dL, p < 0.001), and shorter duration of hospital stay (5.4 ± 0.7 vs. 5.8 ± 0.7 days, p < 0.001). Conclusions: RSTM was associated with shorter operative time relative to CRM. Further prospective studies are needed in order to more fully investigate the advantages of RSTM. MDPI 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9225652/ /pubmed/35743713 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060928 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Won, Seyeon
Choi, Su Hyeon
Lee, Nara
Shim, So Hyun
Kim, Mi Kyoung
Kim, Mi-La
Jung, Yong Wook
Yun, Bo Seong
Seong, Seok Ju
Robotic Single-Site Plus Two-Port Myomectomy versus Conventional Robotic Multi-Port Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title Robotic Single-Site Plus Two-Port Myomectomy versus Conventional Robotic Multi-Port Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_full Robotic Single-Site Plus Two-Port Myomectomy versus Conventional Robotic Multi-Port Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_fullStr Robotic Single-Site Plus Two-Port Myomectomy versus Conventional Robotic Multi-Port Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Single-Site Plus Two-Port Myomectomy versus Conventional Robotic Multi-Port Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_short Robotic Single-Site Plus Two-Port Myomectomy versus Conventional Robotic Multi-Port Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_sort robotic single-site plus two-port myomectomy versus conventional robotic multi-port myomectomy: a propensity score matching analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35743713
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060928
work_keys_str_mv AT wonseyeon roboticsinglesiteplustwoportmyomectomyversusconventionalroboticmultiportmyomectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT choisuhyeon roboticsinglesiteplustwoportmyomectomyversusconventionalroboticmultiportmyomectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT leenara roboticsinglesiteplustwoportmyomectomyversusconventionalroboticmultiportmyomectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT shimsohyun roboticsinglesiteplustwoportmyomectomyversusconventionalroboticmultiportmyomectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT kimmikyoung roboticsinglesiteplustwoportmyomectomyversusconventionalroboticmultiportmyomectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT kimmila roboticsinglesiteplustwoportmyomectomyversusconventionalroboticmultiportmyomectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT jungyongwook roboticsinglesiteplustwoportmyomectomyversusconventionalroboticmultiportmyomectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT yunboseong roboticsinglesiteplustwoportmyomectomyversusconventionalroboticmultiportmyomectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT seongseokju roboticsinglesiteplustwoportmyomectomyversusconventionalroboticmultiportmyomectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis