Cargando…

The frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Multiple assessment tools are used in arthroscopic training and play an important role in feedback. However, it is not fully recognized as to the standard way to apply these tools. Our study aimed to investigate the use of assessment tools in arthroscopic training and determine whether t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Haixia, Xian, Chengyao, Zhang, Kai-Jun, Yang, Zhouwen, Li, Wei, Tian, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35695551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2085317
_version_ 1784733686432792576
author Zhou, Haixia
Xian, Chengyao
Zhang, Kai-Jun
Yang, Zhouwen
Li, Wei
Tian, Jing
author_facet Zhou, Haixia
Xian, Chengyao
Zhang, Kai-Jun
Yang, Zhouwen
Li, Wei
Tian, Jing
author_sort Zhou, Haixia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple assessment tools are used in arthroscopic training and play an important role in feedback. However, it is not fully recognized as to the standard way to apply these tools. Our study aimed to investigate the use of assessment tools in arthroscopic training and determine whether there is an optimal way to apply various assessment tools in arthroscopic training. METHODS: A search was performed using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library electronic databases for articles published in English from January 2000 to July 2021. Eligible for inclusion were primary research articles related to using assessment tools for the evaluation of arthroscopic skills and training environments. Studies that focussed only on therapeutic cases, did not report outcome measures of technical skills, or did not mention arthroscopic skills training were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies were included for review. Multiple assessment tools were used in arthroscopic training. The most common objective metric was completion time, reported in 21 studies. Technical parameters based on simulator or external equipment, such as instrument path length, hand movement, visual parameters and injury, were also widely used. Subjective assessment tools included checklists and global rating scales (GRS). Among these, the most commonly used GRS was the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET). Most of the studies combined objective metrics and subjective assessment scales in the evaluation of arthroscopic skill training CONCLUSIONS: Overall, both subjective and objective assessment tools can be used as feedback for basic arthroscopic skill training, but there are still differences in the frequency of application in different contexts. Despite this, combined use of subjective and objective assessment tools can be applied to more situations and skills and can be the optimal way for assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: KEY MESSAGES: Both subjective and objective assessment tools can be used as feedback for basic arthroscopic skill training. Combined use of subjective and objective assessment tools can be applied to more situations and skills and can be the optimal way for assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9225735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92257352022-06-24 The frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review Zhou, Haixia Xian, Chengyao Zhang, Kai-Jun Yang, Zhouwen Li, Wei Tian, Jing Ann Med Sports Medicine & Musculoskeletal Disorders BACKGROUND: Multiple assessment tools are used in arthroscopic training and play an important role in feedback. However, it is not fully recognized as to the standard way to apply these tools. Our study aimed to investigate the use of assessment tools in arthroscopic training and determine whether there is an optimal way to apply various assessment tools in arthroscopic training. METHODS: A search was performed using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library electronic databases for articles published in English from January 2000 to July 2021. Eligible for inclusion were primary research articles related to using assessment tools for the evaluation of arthroscopic skills and training environments. Studies that focussed only on therapeutic cases, did not report outcome measures of technical skills, or did not mention arthroscopic skills training were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies were included for review. Multiple assessment tools were used in arthroscopic training. The most common objective metric was completion time, reported in 21 studies. Technical parameters based on simulator or external equipment, such as instrument path length, hand movement, visual parameters and injury, were also widely used. Subjective assessment tools included checklists and global rating scales (GRS). Among these, the most commonly used GRS was the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET). Most of the studies combined objective metrics and subjective assessment scales in the evaluation of arthroscopic skill training CONCLUSIONS: Overall, both subjective and objective assessment tools can be used as feedback for basic arthroscopic skill training, but there are still differences in the frequency of application in different contexts. Despite this, combined use of subjective and objective assessment tools can be applied to more situations and skills and can be the optimal way for assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: KEY MESSAGES: Both subjective and objective assessment tools can be used as feedback for basic arthroscopic skill training. Combined use of subjective and objective assessment tools can be applied to more situations and skills and can be the optimal way for assessment. Taylor & Francis 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9225735/ /pubmed/35695551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2085317 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Sports Medicine & Musculoskeletal Disorders
Zhou, Haixia
Xian, Chengyao
Zhang, Kai-Jun
Yang, Zhouwen
Li, Wei
Tian, Jing
The frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review
title The frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review
title_full The frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review
title_fullStr The frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review
title_short The frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review
title_sort frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review
topic Sports Medicine & Musculoskeletal Disorders
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35695551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2085317
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouhaixia thefrequencyofassessmenttoolsinarthroscopictrainingasystematicreview
AT xianchengyao thefrequencyofassessmenttoolsinarthroscopictrainingasystematicreview
AT zhangkaijun thefrequencyofassessmenttoolsinarthroscopictrainingasystematicreview
AT yangzhouwen thefrequencyofassessmenttoolsinarthroscopictrainingasystematicreview
AT liwei thefrequencyofassessmenttoolsinarthroscopictrainingasystematicreview
AT tianjing thefrequencyofassessmenttoolsinarthroscopictrainingasystematicreview
AT zhouhaixia frequencyofassessmenttoolsinarthroscopictrainingasystematicreview
AT xianchengyao frequencyofassessmenttoolsinarthroscopictrainingasystematicreview
AT zhangkaijun frequencyofassessmenttoolsinarthroscopictrainingasystematicreview
AT yangzhouwen frequencyofassessmenttoolsinarthroscopictrainingasystematicreview
AT liwei frequencyofassessmenttoolsinarthroscopictrainingasystematicreview
AT tianjing frequencyofassessmenttoolsinarthroscopictrainingasystematicreview