Cargando…

Video-based coaching for surgical residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Video-based coaching (VBC) is used to supplement current teaching methods in surgical education and may be useful in competency-based frameworks. Whether VBC can effectively improve surgical skill in surgical residents has yet to be fully elucidated. The objective of this study is to com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel, Ryan, McKechnie, Tyler, Kruse, Colin C., Levin, Marc, Lee, Yung, Doumouras, Aristithes G., Hong, Dennis, Eskicioglu, Cagla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35739431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09379-4
_version_ 1784733703997489152
author Daniel, Ryan
McKechnie, Tyler
Kruse, Colin C.
Levin, Marc
Lee, Yung
Doumouras, Aristithes G.
Hong, Dennis
Eskicioglu, Cagla
author_facet Daniel, Ryan
McKechnie, Tyler
Kruse, Colin C.
Levin, Marc
Lee, Yung
Doumouras, Aristithes G.
Hong, Dennis
Eskicioglu, Cagla
author_sort Daniel, Ryan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Video-based coaching (VBC) is used to supplement current teaching methods in surgical education and may be useful in competency-based frameworks. Whether VBC can effectively improve surgical skill in surgical residents has yet to be fully elucidated. The objective of this study is to compare surgical residents receiving and not receiving VBC in terms of technical surgical skill. METHODS: The following databases were searched from database inception to October 2021: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PubMed. Articles were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgical residents receiving and not receiving VBC. The primary outcome, as defined prior to data collection, was change in objective measures of technical surgical skill following implementation of either VBC or control. A pairwise meta-analyses using inverse variance random effects was performed. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were used as the primary outcome measure to account for differences in objective surgical skill evaluation tools. RESULTS: From 2734 citations, 11 RCTs with 157 residents receiving VBC and 141 residents receiving standard surgical teaching without VBC were included. There was no significant difference in post-coaching scores on objective surgical skill evaluation tools between groups (SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.01, p = 0.05, I(2) = 74%). The improvement in scores pre- and post-intervention was significantly greater in residents receiving VBC compared to those not receiving VBC (SMD 1.62, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.63, p = 0.002, I(2) = 85%). These results were unchanged with leave-one-out sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis according to operative setting. CONCLUSION: VBC can improve objective surgical skills in surgical residents of various levels. The benefit may be most substantial for trainees with lower baseline levels of objective skill. Further studies are required to determine the impact of VBC on competency-based frameworks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9225812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92258122022-06-24 Video-based coaching for surgical residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis Daniel, Ryan McKechnie, Tyler Kruse, Colin C. Levin, Marc Lee, Yung Doumouras, Aristithes G. Hong, Dennis Eskicioglu, Cagla Surg Endosc 2022 SAGES Oral BACKGROUND: Video-based coaching (VBC) is used to supplement current teaching methods in surgical education and may be useful in competency-based frameworks. Whether VBC can effectively improve surgical skill in surgical residents has yet to be fully elucidated. The objective of this study is to compare surgical residents receiving and not receiving VBC in terms of technical surgical skill. METHODS: The following databases were searched from database inception to October 2021: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PubMed. Articles were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgical residents receiving and not receiving VBC. The primary outcome, as defined prior to data collection, was change in objective measures of technical surgical skill following implementation of either VBC or control. A pairwise meta-analyses using inverse variance random effects was performed. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were used as the primary outcome measure to account for differences in objective surgical skill evaluation tools. RESULTS: From 2734 citations, 11 RCTs with 157 residents receiving VBC and 141 residents receiving standard surgical teaching without VBC were included. There was no significant difference in post-coaching scores on objective surgical skill evaluation tools between groups (SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.01, p = 0.05, I(2) = 74%). The improvement in scores pre- and post-intervention was significantly greater in residents receiving VBC compared to those not receiving VBC (SMD 1.62, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.63, p = 0.002, I(2) = 85%). These results were unchanged with leave-one-out sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis according to operative setting. CONCLUSION: VBC can improve objective surgical skills in surgical residents of various levels. The benefit may be most substantial for trainees with lower baseline levels of objective skill. Further studies are required to determine the impact of VBC on competency-based frameworks. Springer US 2022-06-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9225812/ /pubmed/35739431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09379-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle 2022 SAGES Oral
Daniel, Ryan
McKechnie, Tyler
Kruse, Colin C.
Levin, Marc
Lee, Yung
Doumouras, Aristithes G.
Hong, Dennis
Eskicioglu, Cagla
Video-based coaching for surgical residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Video-based coaching for surgical residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Video-based coaching for surgical residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Video-based coaching for surgical residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Video-based coaching for surgical residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Video-based coaching for surgical residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort video-based coaching for surgical residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 2022 SAGES Oral
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35739431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09379-4
work_keys_str_mv AT danielryan videobasedcoachingforsurgicalresidentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mckechnietyler videobasedcoachingforsurgicalresidentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT krusecolinc videobasedcoachingforsurgicalresidentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT levinmarc videobasedcoachingforsurgicalresidentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leeyung videobasedcoachingforsurgicalresidentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT doumourasaristithesg videobasedcoachingforsurgicalresidentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hongdennis videobasedcoachingforsurgicalresidentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eskicioglucagla videobasedcoachingforsurgicalresidentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis