Cargando…

Variation of the modulus of elasticity of aligner foil sheet materials due to thermoforming

OBJECTIVE: Investigate and compare the mechanical properties of different aligner materials before and after deep drawing and determine differences in the mechanical properties after thermoforming. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four aligner film sheets from three manufacturers (Duran Plus® [Scheu Dental, I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golkhani, Bijan, Weber, Anna, Keilig, Ludger, Reimann, Susanne, Bourauel, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34414481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00327-w
_version_ 1784733743710208000
author Golkhani, Bijan
Weber, Anna
Keilig, Ludger
Reimann, Susanne
Bourauel, Christoph
author_facet Golkhani, Bijan
Weber, Anna
Keilig, Ludger
Reimann, Susanne
Bourauel, Christoph
author_sort Golkhani, Bijan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Investigate and compare the mechanical properties of different aligner materials before and after deep drawing and determine differences in the mechanical properties after thermoforming. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four aligner film sheets from three manufacturers (Duran Plus® [Scheu Dental, Iserlohn, Germany]; Zendura® [ClearCorrect, Bay Materials LLC, Fremont, CA, USA]; Essix ACE® and Essix® PLUS™ [Dentsply Sirona Deutschland, Bensheim, Germany]) were tested in 3‑point bending with support distances of 8, 16, and 24 mm. Dimension of the specimens was 10 × 50 mm(2). Two groups each were tested: (1) 10 specimens were investigated in the as-received state (before thermoforming), (2) 10 specimens were deep drawn on a master plate with cuboids of the dimension 10 × 10 × 50 mm(3). Then, specimens were cut out of the upper side and lateral walls and were measured in 3‑point bending. Forces and reduction in thickness were measured and corrected theoretical forces of drawn sheets after thickness reduction as well as Young’s modulus were calculated. RESULTS: At a support distance of 8 mm and a displacement of 0.25 mm Essix® PLUS™, having the highest thickness in untreated state, showed highest forces of 28.2 N, followed by Duran Plus® (27.3 N), Essix ACE® (21.0 N) and Zendura® (19.7 N). Similar results were registered for the other distances (16, 24 mm). Thermoforming drastically reduced thickness and forces in the bending tests. Forces decreased to around 10% or less for specimens cut from the lateral walls. Young’s modulus decreased significantly for deep drawn foil sheets, especially for Essix® PLUS™. CONCLUSIONS: Three-point bending is an appropriate method to compare different foil sheet materials. Young’s modulus is significantly affected by thermoforming. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00056-021-00327-w) contains supplementary information, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9225978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92259782022-06-25 Variation of the modulus of elasticity of aligner foil sheet materials due to thermoforming Golkhani, Bijan Weber, Anna Keilig, Ludger Reimann, Susanne Bourauel, Christoph J Orofac Orthop Original Article OBJECTIVE: Investigate and compare the mechanical properties of different aligner materials before and after deep drawing and determine differences in the mechanical properties after thermoforming. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four aligner film sheets from three manufacturers (Duran Plus® [Scheu Dental, Iserlohn, Germany]; Zendura® [ClearCorrect, Bay Materials LLC, Fremont, CA, USA]; Essix ACE® and Essix® PLUS™ [Dentsply Sirona Deutschland, Bensheim, Germany]) were tested in 3‑point bending with support distances of 8, 16, and 24 mm. Dimension of the specimens was 10 × 50 mm(2). Two groups each were tested: (1) 10 specimens were investigated in the as-received state (before thermoforming), (2) 10 specimens were deep drawn on a master plate with cuboids of the dimension 10 × 10 × 50 mm(3). Then, specimens were cut out of the upper side and lateral walls and were measured in 3‑point bending. Forces and reduction in thickness were measured and corrected theoretical forces of drawn sheets after thickness reduction as well as Young’s modulus were calculated. RESULTS: At a support distance of 8 mm and a displacement of 0.25 mm Essix® PLUS™, having the highest thickness in untreated state, showed highest forces of 28.2 N, followed by Duran Plus® (27.3 N), Essix ACE® (21.0 N) and Zendura® (19.7 N). Similar results were registered for the other distances (16, 24 mm). Thermoforming drastically reduced thickness and forces in the bending tests. Forces decreased to around 10% or less for specimens cut from the lateral walls. Young’s modulus decreased significantly for deep drawn foil sheets, especially for Essix® PLUS™. CONCLUSIONS: Three-point bending is an appropriate method to compare different foil sheet materials. Young’s modulus is significantly affected by thermoforming. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00056-021-00327-w) contains supplementary information, which is available to authorized users. Springer Medizin 2021-08-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9225978/ /pubmed/34414481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00327-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Golkhani, Bijan
Weber, Anna
Keilig, Ludger
Reimann, Susanne
Bourauel, Christoph
Variation of the modulus of elasticity of aligner foil sheet materials due to thermoforming
title Variation of the modulus of elasticity of aligner foil sheet materials due to thermoforming
title_full Variation of the modulus of elasticity of aligner foil sheet materials due to thermoforming
title_fullStr Variation of the modulus of elasticity of aligner foil sheet materials due to thermoforming
title_full_unstemmed Variation of the modulus of elasticity of aligner foil sheet materials due to thermoforming
title_short Variation of the modulus of elasticity of aligner foil sheet materials due to thermoforming
title_sort variation of the modulus of elasticity of aligner foil sheet materials due to thermoforming
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34414481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00327-w
work_keys_str_mv AT golkhanibijan variationofthemodulusofelasticityofalignerfoilsheetmaterialsduetothermoforming
AT weberanna variationofthemodulusofelasticityofalignerfoilsheetmaterialsduetothermoforming
AT keiligludger variationofthemodulusofelasticityofalignerfoilsheetmaterialsduetothermoforming
AT reimannsusanne variationofthemodulusofelasticityofalignerfoilsheetmaterialsduetothermoforming
AT bourauelchristoph variationofthemodulusofelasticityofalignerfoilsheetmaterialsduetothermoforming