Cargando…

Individual differences in frontoparietal plasticity in humans

Neuroplasticity, defined as the brain’s potential to change in response to its environment, has been extensively studied at the cellular and molecular levels. Work in animal models suggests that stimulation to the ventral tegmental area (VTA) enhances plasticity, and that myelination constrains plas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boroshok, Austin L., Park, Anne T., Fotiadis, Panagiotis, Velasquez, Gerardo H., Tooley, Ursula A., Simon, Katrina R., Forde, Jasmine C. P., Delgado Reyes, Lourdes M., Tisdall, M. Dylan, Bassett, Dani S., Cooper, Emily A., Mackey, Allyson P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35739201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00130-1
_version_ 1784733755808677888
author Boroshok, Austin L.
Park, Anne T.
Fotiadis, Panagiotis
Velasquez, Gerardo H.
Tooley, Ursula A.
Simon, Katrina R.
Forde, Jasmine C. P.
Delgado Reyes, Lourdes M.
Tisdall, M. Dylan
Bassett, Dani S.
Cooper, Emily A.
Mackey, Allyson P.
author_facet Boroshok, Austin L.
Park, Anne T.
Fotiadis, Panagiotis
Velasquez, Gerardo H.
Tooley, Ursula A.
Simon, Katrina R.
Forde, Jasmine C. P.
Delgado Reyes, Lourdes M.
Tisdall, M. Dylan
Bassett, Dani S.
Cooper, Emily A.
Mackey, Allyson P.
author_sort Boroshok, Austin L.
collection PubMed
description Neuroplasticity, defined as the brain’s potential to change in response to its environment, has been extensively studied at the cellular and molecular levels. Work in animal models suggests that stimulation to the ventral tegmental area (VTA) enhances plasticity, and that myelination constrains plasticity. Little is known, however, about whether proxy measures of these properties in the human brain are associated with learning. Here, we investigated the plasticity of the frontoparietal system by asking whether VTA resting-state functional connectivity and myelin map values (T1w/T2w ratios) predicted learning after short-term training on the adaptive n-back (n = 46, ages 18–25). We found that stronger baseline connectivity between VTA and lateral prefrontal cortex predicted greater improvements in accuracy. Lower myelin map values predicted improvements in response times, but not accuracy. Our findings suggest that proxy markers of neural plasticity can predict learning in humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9226021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92260212022-06-25 Individual differences in frontoparietal plasticity in humans Boroshok, Austin L. Park, Anne T. Fotiadis, Panagiotis Velasquez, Gerardo H. Tooley, Ursula A. Simon, Katrina R. Forde, Jasmine C. P. Delgado Reyes, Lourdes M. Tisdall, M. Dylan Bassett, Dani S. Cooper, Emily A. Mackey, Allyson P. NPJ Sci Learn Article Neuroplasticity, defined as the brain’s potential to change in response to its environment, has been extensively studied at the cellular and molecular levels. Work in animal models suggests that stimulation to the ventral tegmental area (VTA) enhances plasticity, and that myelination constrains plasticity. Little is known, however, about whether proxy measures of these properties in the human brain are associated with learning. Here, we investigated the plasticity of the frontoparietal system by asking whether VTA resting-state functional connectivity and myelin map values (T1w/T2w ratios) predicted learning after short-term training on the adaptive n-back (n = 46, ages 18–25). We found that stronger baseline connectivity between VTA and lateral prefrontal cortex predicted greater improvements in accuracy. Lower myelin map values predicted improvements in response times, but not accuracy. Our findings suggest that proxy markers of neural plasticity can predict learning in humans. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9226021/ /pubmed/35739201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00130-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Boroshok, Austin L.
Park, Anne T.
Fotiadis, Panagiotis
Velasquez, Gerardo H.
Tooley, Ursula A.
Simon, Katrina R.
Forde, Jasmine C. P.
Delgado Reyes, Lourdes M.
Tisdall, M. Dylan
Bassett, Dani S.
Cooper, Emily A.
Mackey, Allyson P.
Individual differences in frontoparietal plasticity in humans
title Individual differences in frontoparietal plasticity in humans
title_full Individual differences in frontoparietal plasticity in humans
title_fullStr Individual differences in frontoparietal plasticity in humans
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in frontoparietal plasticity in humans
title_short Individual differences in frontoparietal plasticity in humans
title_sort individual differences in frontoparietal plasticity in humans
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35739201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00130-1
work_keys_str_mv AT boroshokaustinl individualdifferencesinfrontoparietalplasticityinhumans
AT parkannet individualdifferencesinfrontoparietalplasticityinhumans
AT fotiadispanagiotis individualdifferencesinfrontoparietalplasticityinhumans
AT velasquezgerardoh individualdifferencesinfrontoparietalplasticityinhumans
AT tooleyursulaa individualdifferencesinfrontoparietalplasticityinhumans
AT simonkatrinar individualdifferencesinfrontoparietalplasticityinhumans
AT fordejasminecp individualdifferencesinfrontoparietalplasticityinhumans
AT delgadoreyeslourdesm individualdifferencesinfrontoparietalplasticityinhumans
AT tisdallmdylan individualdifferencesinfrontoparietalplasticityinhumans
AT bassettdanis individualdifferencesinfrontoparietalplasticityinhumans
AT cooperemilya individualdifferencesinfrontoparietalplasticityinhumans
AT mackeyallysonp individualdifferencesinfrontoparietalplasticityinhumans