Cargando…

On-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a European tertiary care center

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportions of abdominal US examinations during on-call hours that are negative and that contain an incidentaloma, and to explore temporal changes and determinants. METHODS: This study included 1615 US examinations that were done during on-call hours at a tertiary care c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sluijter, Tim E., Yakar, Derya, Kwee, Thomas C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35486165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03525-1
_version_ 1784733774128349184
author Sluijter, Tim E.
Yakar, Derya
Kwee, Thomas C.
author_facet Sluijter, Tim E.
Yakar, Derya
Kwee, Thomas C.
author_sort Sluijter, Tim E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportions of abdominal US examinations during on-call hours that are negative and that contain an incidentaloma, and to explore temporal changes and determinants. METHODS: This study included 1615 US examinations that were done during on-call hours at a tertiary care center between 2005 and 2017. RESULTS: The total proportion of negative US examinations was 49.2% (795/1615). The total proportion of US examinations with an incidentaloma was 8.0% (130/1615). There were no significant temporal changes in either one of these proportions. The likelihood of a negative US examination was significantly higher when requested by anesthesiology [odds ratio (OR) 2.609, P = 0.011], or when the indication for US was focused on gallbladder and biliary ducts (OR 1.556, P = 0.007), transplant (OR 2.371, P = 0.005), trauma (OR 3.274, P < 0.001), or urolithiasis/postrenal obstruction (OR 3.366, P < 0.001). In contrast, US examinations were significantly less likely to be negative when requested by urology (OR 0.423, P = 0.014), or when the indication for US was acute oncology (OR 0.207, P = 0.045) or appendicitis (OR 0.260, P < 0.001). The likelihood of an incidentaloma on US was significantly higher in older patients (OR 1.020 per year of age increase, P < 0.001) or when the liver was evaluated with US (OR 3.522, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Nearly 50% of abdominal US examinations during on-call hours are negative, and 8% reveal an incidentaloma. Requesting specialty and indication for US affect the likelihood of a negative examination, and higher patient age and liver evaluations increase the chance of detecting an incidentaloma in this setting. These data may potentially be used to improve clinical reasoning and restrain overutilization of imaging. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00261-022-03525-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9226090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92260902022-06-25 On-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a European tertiary care center Sluijter, Tim E. Yakar, Derya Kwee, Thomas C. Abdom Radiol (NY) Practice OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportions of abdominal US examinations during on-call hours that are negative and that contain an incidentaloma, and to explore temporal changes and determinants. METHODS: This study included 1615 US examinations that were done during on-call hours at a tertiary care center between 2005 and 2017. RESULTS: The total proportion of negative US examinations was 49.2% (795/1615). The total proportion of US examinations with an incidentaloma was 8.0% (130/1615). There were no significant temporal changes in either one of these proportions. The likelihood of a negative US examination was significantly higher when requested by anesthesiology [odds ratio (OR) 2.609, P = 0.011], or when the indication for US was focused on gallbladder and biliary ducts (OR 1.556, P = 0.007), transplant (OR 2.371, P = 0.005), trauma (OR 3.274, P < 0.001), or urolithiasis/postrenal obstruction (OR 3.366, P < 0.001). In contrast, US examinations were significantly less likely to be negative when requested by urology (OR 0.423, P = 0.014), or when the indication for US was acute oncology (OR 0.207, P = 0.045) or appendicitis (OR 0.260, P < 0.001). The likelihood of an incidentaloma on US was significantly higher in older patients (OR 1.020 per year of age increase, P < 0.001) or when the liver was evaluated with US (OR 3.522, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Nearly 50% of abdominal US examinations during on-call hours are negative, and 8% reveal an incidentaloma. Requesting specialty and indication for US affect the likelihood of a negative examination, and higher patient age and liver evaluations increase the chance of detecting an incidentaloma in this setting. These data may potentially be used to improve clinical reasoning and restrain overutilization of imaging. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00261-022-03525-1. Springer US 2022-04-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9226090/ /pubmed/35486165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03525-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Practice
Sluijter, Tim E.
Yakar, Derya
Kwee, Thomas C.
On-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a European tertiary care center
title On-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a European tertiary care center
title_full On-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a European tertiary care center
title_fullStr On-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a European tertiary care center
title_full_unstemmed On-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a European tertiary care center
title_short On-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a European tertiary care center
title_sort on-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a european tertiary care center
topic Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35486165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03525-1
work_keys_str_mv AT sluijtertime oncallabdominalultrasonographytherateofnegativeexaminationsandincidentalomasinaeuropeantertiarycarecenter
AT yakarderya oncallabdominalultrasonographytherateofnegativeexaminationsandincidentalomasinaeuropeantertiarycarecenter
AT kweethomasc oncallabdominalultrasonographytherateofnegativeexaminationsandincidentalomasinaeuropeantertiarycarecenter