Cargando…

Evaluation of maxillary sinusitis from panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomographic images using a convolutional neural network

PURPOSE: This study developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to diagnose maxillary sinusitis on panoramic radiographs (PRs) and cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images and evaluated its performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A CNN model, which is an artificial intelligence method, was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serindere, Gozde, Bilgili, Ersen, Yesil, Cagri, Ozveren, Neslihan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799961
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.20210263
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to diagnose maxillary sinusitis on panoramic radiographs (PRs) and cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images and evaluated its performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A CNN model, which is an artificial intelligence method, was utilized. The model was trained and tested by applying 5-fold cross-validation to a dataset of 148 healthy and 148 inflamed sinus images. The CNN model was implemented using the PyTorch library of the Python programming language. A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted, and the area under the curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for both imaging techniques were calculated to evaluate the model. RESULTS: The average accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model in diagnosing sinusitis from PRs were 75.7%, 75.7%, and 75.7%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the deep-learning system in diagnosing sinusitis from CBCT images were 99.7%, 100%, and 99.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of the CNN for maxillary sinusitis from PRs was moderately high, whereas it was clearly higher with CBCT images. Three-dimensional images are accepted as the “gold standard” for diagnosis; therefore, this was not an unexpected result. Based on these results, deep-learning systems could be used as an effective guide in assisting with diagnoses, especially for less experienced practitioners.