Cargando…

The Leader Vitality Scale: Development, Psychometric Assessment, and Validation

One of the most important units of analysis for positive organizational psychology research is leaders and future leaders in the workplace. Leaders often have a large responsibility for and influence on the well-being and performance of their followers. They also face the unique challenge of serving...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shapiro, Jamie, Donaldson, Stewart I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884672
_version_ 1784733842747162624
author Shapiro, Jamie
Donaldson, Stewart I.
author_facet Shapiro, Jamie
Donaldson, Stewart I.
author_sort Shapiro, Jamie
collection PubMed
description One of the most important units of analysis for positive organizational psychology research is leaders and future leaders in the workplace. Leaders often have a large responsibility for and influence on the well-being and performance of their followers. They also face the unique challenge of serving their followers and the organization while needing to maintain their own vitality and well-being. Vitality can provide a foundation of energy resources to a leader to serve at their full capacity. This study develops and empirically examines a new three factor scale to measure leader vitality which includes physical, psychological, and emotional components. In study 1, a total of 175 participants (including n = 128 leaders) completed the Leader Vitality Scale (LVS) and other positive psychology related measures. Exploratory factor analysis and then confirmatory factor analysis showed that the LVS is hierarchical with three distinct factors, with overall vitality as the higher-order factor. Correlational tests with two established vitality scales for general use showed that the LVS is positively related to existing scales, demonstrating convergent validity. In study 2, data was gathered from 92 top level leaders in the C-Suite (n = 25), vice presidents (n = 23), directors (n = 21), and managers (n = 23) of organizations across the United States. Results showed that LVS scores significantly correlated with life satisfaction, positive emotions, positive functioning at work, and psychological capital. Overall, these findings suggest that the LVS is a valid measure for assessing leader vitality, and can used in future studies of well-being and positive functioning at work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9226326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92263262022-06-25 The Leader Vitality Scale: Development, Psychometric Assessment, and Validation Shapiro, Jamie Donaldson, Stewart I. Front Psychol Psychology One of the most important units of analysis for positive organizational psychology research is leaders and future leaders in the workplace. Leaders often have a large responsibility for and influence on the well-being and performance of their followers. They also face the unique challenge of serving their followers and the organization while needing to maintain their own vitality and well-being. Vitality can provide a foundation of energy resources to a leader to serve at their full capacity. This study develops and empirically examines a new three factor scale to measure leader vitality which includes physical, psychological, and emotional components. In study 1, a total of 175 participants (including n = 128 leaders) completed the Leader Vitality Scale (LVS) and other positive psychology related measures. Exploratory factor analysis and then confirmatory factor analysis showed that the LVS is hierarchical with three distinct factors, with overall vitality as the higher-order factor. Correlational tests with two established vitality scales for general use showed that the LVS is positively related to existing scales, demonstrating convergent validity. In study 2, data was gathered from 92 top level leaders in the C-Suite (n = 25), vice presidents (n = 23), directors (n = 21), and managers (n = 23) of organizations across the United States. Results showed that LVS scores significantly correlated with life satisfaction, positive emotions, positive functioning at work, and psychological capital. Overall, these findings suggest that the LVS is a valid measure for assessing leader vitality, and can used in future studies of well-being and positive functioning at work. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9226326/ /pubmed/35756249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884672 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shapiro and Donaldson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Shapiro, Jamie
Donaldson, Stewart I.
The Leader Vitality Scale: Development, Psychometric Assessment, and Validation
title The Leader Vitality Scale: Development, Psychometric Assessment, and Validation
title_full The Leader Vitality Scale: Development, Psychometric Assessment, and Validation
title_fullStr The Leader Vitality Scale: Development, Psychometric Assessment, and Validation
title_full_unstemmed The Leader Vitality Scale: Development, Psychometric Assessment, and Validation
title_short The Leader Vitality Scale: Development, Psychometric Assessment, and Validation
title_sort leader vitality scale: development, psychometric assessment, and validation
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884672
work_keys_str_mv AT shapirojamie theleadervitalityscaledevelopmentpsychometricassessmentandvalidation
AT donaldsonstewarti theleadervitalityscaledevelopmentpsychometricassessmentandvalidation
AT shapirojamie leadervitalityscaledevelopmentpsychometricassessmentandvalidation
AT donaldsonstewarti leadervitalityscaledevelopmentpsychometricassessmentandvalidation