Cargando…

Breast Cancer Stigma Scale: A Reliable and Valid Stigma Measure for Patients With Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: This study aims to develop and validate a stigma scale for Chinese patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Patients admitted to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, for breast cancer treatment participated in this study. Development of the Br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bu, Xiaofan, Li, Shuangshuang, Cheng, Andy S. K., Ng, Peter H. F., Xu, Xianghua, Xia, Yimin, Liu, Xiangyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756211
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841280
_version_ 1784733877435105280
author Bu, Xiaofan
Li, Shuangshuang
Cheng, Andy S. K.
Ng, Peter H. F.
Xu, Xianghua
Xia, Yimin
Liu, Xiangyu
author_facet Bu, Xiaofan
Li, Shuangshuang
Cheng, Andy S. K.
Ng, Peter H. F.
Xu, Xianghua
Xia, Yimin
Liu, Xiangyu
author_sort Bu, Xiaofan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aims to develop and validate a stigma scale for Chinese patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Patients admitted to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, for breast cancer treatment participated in this study. Development of the Breast Cancer Stigma Scale involved the following procedures: literature review, interview, and applying a theoretical model to generate items; the Breast Cancer Stigma Scale’s content validity was assessed by a Delphi study (n = 15) and feedback from patients with breast cancer (n = 10); exploratory factor analysis (n = 200) was used to assess the construct validity; convergent validity was assessed with the Social Impact Scale (n = 50); internal consistency Cronbach’s α (n = 200), split-half reliability (n = 200), and test–retest reliability (N = 50) were used to identify the reliability of the scale. RESULTS: The final version of the Breast Cancer Stigma Scale consisted of 15 items and showed positive correlations with the Social Impact Scale (ρ = 0.641, P < 0.001). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed four components of the Breast Cancer Stigma Scale: self-image impairment, social isolation, discrimination, and internalized stigma, which were strongly related to our perceived breast cancer stigma model and accounted for 69.443% of the total variance. Cronbach’s α for the total scale was 0.86, and each subscale was 0.75–0.882. The test–retest reliability with intra-class correlation coefficients of the total scale was 0.947 (P < 0.001), and split-half reliability with intra-class correlation coefficients of the total scale was 0.911 (P < 0.001). The content validity index (CVI) was 0.73–1.0. CONCLUSION: The newly developed Breast Cancer Stigma Scale offers a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the perceived stigma of patients with breast cancer in clinical and research settings. It may be helpful for stigma prevention in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9226439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92264392022-06-25 Breast Cancer Stigma Scale: A Reliable and Valid Stigma Measure for Patients With Breast Cancer Bu, Xiaofan Li, Shuangshuang Cheng, Andy S. K. Ng, Peter H. F. Xu, Xianghua Xia, Yimin Liu, Xiangyu Front Psychol Psychology PURPOSE: This study aims to develop and validate a stigma scale for Chinese patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Patients admitted to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, for breast cancer treatment participated in this study. Development of the Breast Cancer Stigma Scale involved the following procedures: literature review, interview, and applying a theoretical model to generate items; the Breast Cancer Stigma Scale’s content validity was assessed by a Delphi study (n = 15) and feedback from patients with breast cancer (n = 10); exploratory factor analysis (n = 200) was used to assess the construct validity; convergent validity was assessed with the Social Impact Scale (n = 50); internal consistency Cronbach’s α (n = 200), split-half reliability (n = 200), and test–retest reliability (N = 50) were used to identify the reliability of the scale. RESULTS: The final version of the Breast Cancer Stigma Scale consisted of 15 items and showed positive correlations with the Social Impact Scale (ρ = 0.641, P < 0.001). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed four components of the Breast Cancer Stigma Scale: self-image impairment, social isolation, discrimination, and internalized stigma, which were strongly related to our perceived breast cancer stigma model and accounted for 69.443% of the total variance. Cronbach’s α for the total scale was 0.86, and each subscale was 0.75–0.882. The test–retest reliability with intra-class correlation coefficients of the total scale was 0.947 (P < 0.001), and split-half reliability with intra-class correlation coefficients of the total scale was 0.911 (P < 0.001). The content validity index (CVI) was 0.73–1.0. CONCLUSION: The newly developed Breast Cancer Stigma Scale offers a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the perceived stigma of patients with breast cancer in clinical and research settings. It may be helpful for stigma prevention in China. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9226439/ /pubmed/35756211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841280 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bu, Li, Cheng, Ng, Xu, Xia and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Bu, Xiaofan
Li, Shuangshuang
Cheng, Andy S. K.
Ng, Peter H. F.
Xu, Xianghua
Xia, Yimin
Liu, Xiangyu
Breast Cancer Stigma Scale: A Reliable and Valid Stigma Measure for Patients With Breast Cancer
title Breast Cancer Stigma Scale: A Reliable and Valid Stigma Measure for Patients With Breast Cancer
title_full Breast Cancer Stigma Scale: A Reliable and Valid Stigma Measure for Patients With Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Breast Cancer Stigma Scale: A Reliable and Valid Stigma Measure for Patients With Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Breast Cancer Stigma Scale: A Reliable and Valid Stigma Measure for Patients With Breast Cancer
title_short Breast Cancer Stigma Scale: A Reliable and Valid Stigma Measure for Patients With Breast Cancer
title_sort breast cancer stigma scale: a reliable and valid stigma measure for patients with breast cancer
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756211
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841280
work_keys_str_mv AT buxiaofan breastcancerstigmascaleareliableandvalidstigmameasureforpatientswithbreastcancer
AT lishuangshuang breastcancerstigmascaleareliableandvalidstigmameasureforpatientswithbreastcancer
AT chengandysk breastcancerstigmascaleareliableandvalidstigmameasureforpatientswithbreastcancer
AT ngpeterhf breastcancerstigmascaleareliableandvalidstigmameasureforpatientswithbreastcancer
AT xuxianghua breastcancerstigmascaleareliableandvalidstigmameasureforpatientswithbreastcancer
AT xiayimin breastcancerstigmascaleareliableandvalidstigmameasureforpatientswithbreastcancer
AT liuxiangyu breastcancerstigmascaleareliableandvalidstigmameasureforpatientswithbreastcancer