Cargando…

Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Explained by the Free Energy Principle

According to the free energy principle, all sentient beings strive to minimize surprise or, in other words, an information-theoretical quantity called variational free energy. Consequently, psychosocial “stress” can be redefined as a state of “heightened expected free energy,” that is, a state of “e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, Achim, Hartwig, Mattis, Spiller, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756264
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.931701
_version_ 1784733974500737024
author Peters, Achim
Hartwig, Mattis
Spiller, Tobias
author_facet Peters, Achim
Hartwig, Mattis
Spiller, Tobias
author_sort Peters, Achim
collection PubMed
description According to the free energy principle, all sentient beings strive to minimize surprise or, in other words, an information-theoretical quantity called variational free energy. Consequently, psychosocial “stress” can be redefined as a state of “heightened expected free energy,” that is, a state of “expected surprise” or “uncertainty.” Individuals experiencing stress primarily attempt to reduce uncertainty, or expected free energy, with the help of what is called an uncertainty resolution program (URP). The URP consists of three subroutines: First, an arousal state is induced that increases cerebral information transmission and processing to reduce uncertainty as quickly as possible. Second, these additional computations cost the brain additional energy, which it demands from the body. Third, the program controls which stress reduction measures are learned for future use and which are not. We refer to an episode as “good” stress, when the URP has successfully reduced uncertainty. Failure of the URP to adequately reduce uncertainty results in either stress habituation or prolonged toxic stress. Stress habituation reduces uncertainty by flattening/broadening individual goal beliefs so that outcomes previously considered as untenable become acceptable. Habituated individuals experience so-called “tolerable” stress. Referring to the Selfish Brain theory and the experimental evidence supporting it, we show that habituated people, who lack stress arousals and therefore have decreased average brain energy consumption, tend to develop an obese type 2 diabetes mellitus phenotype. People, for whom habituation is not the free-energy-optimal solution, do not reduce their uncertainty by changing their goal preferences, and are left with nothing but “toxic” stress. Toxic stress leads to recurrent or persistent arousal states and thus increased average brain energy consumption, which in turn promotes the development of a lean type 2 diabetes mellitus phenotype. In conclusion, we anchor the psychosomatic concept of stress in the information-theoretical concept of uncertainty as defined by the free energy principle. In addition, we detail the neurobiological mechanisms underlying uncertainty reduction and illustrate how uncertainty can lead to psychosomatic illness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9226719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92267192022-06-25 Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Explained by the Free Energy Principle Peters, Achim Hartwig, Mattis Spiller, Tobias Front Psychol Psychology According to the free energy principle, all sentient beings strive to minimize surprise or, in other words, an information-theoretical quantity called variational free energy. Consequently, psychosocial “stress” can be redefined as a state of “heightened expected free energy,” that is, a state of “expected surprise” or “uncertainty.” Individuals experiencing stress primarily attempt to reduce uncertainty, or expected free energy, with the help of what is called an uncertainty resolution program (URP). The URP consists of three subroutines: First, an arousal state is induced that increases cerebral information transmission and processing to reduce uncertainty as quickly as possible. Second, these additional computations cost the brain additional energy, which it demands from the body. Third, the program controls which stress reduction measures are learned for future use and which are not. We refer to an episode as “good” stress, when the URP has successfully reduced uncertainty. Failure of the URP to adequately reduce uncertainty results in either stress habituation or prolonged toxic stress. Stress habituation reduces uncertainty by flattening/broadening individual goal beliefs so that outcomes previously considered as untenable become acceptable. Habituated individuals experience so-called “tolerable” stress. Referring to the Selfish Brain theory and the experimental evidence supporting it, we show that habituated people, who lack stress arousals and therefore have decreased average brain energy consumption, tend to develop an obese type 2 diabetes mellitus phenotype. People, for whom habituation is not the free-energy-optimal solution, do not reduce their uncertainty by changing their goal preferences, and are left with nothing but “toxic” stress. Toxic stress leads to recurrent or persistent arousal states and thus increased average brain energy consumption, which in turn promotes the development of a lean type 2 diabetes mellitus phenotype. In conclusion, we anchor the psychosomatic concept of stress in the information-theoretical concept of uncertainty as defined by the free energy principle. In addition, we detail the neurobiological mechanisms underlying uncertainty reduction and illustrate how uncertainty can lead to psychosomatic illness. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9226719/ /pubmed/35756264 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.931701 Text en Copyright © 2022 Peters, Hartwig and Spiller. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Peters, Achim
Hartwig, Mattis
Spiller, Tobias
Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Explained by the Free Energy Principle
title Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Explained by the Free Energy Principle
title_full Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Explained by the Free Energy Principle
title_fullStr Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Explained by the Free Energy Principle
title_full_unstemmed Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Explained by the Free Energy Principle
title_short Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Explained by the Free Energy Principle
title_sort obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus explained by the free energy principle
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756264
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.931701
work_keys_str_mv AT petersachim obesityandtype2diabetesmellitusexplainedbythefreeenergyprinciple
AT hartwigmattis obesityandtype2diabetesmellitusexplainedbythefreeenergyprinciple
AT spillertobias obesityandtype2diabetesmellitusexplainedbythefreeenergyprinciple