Cargando…

Resident integration with inpatient clinical documentation improvement: a quality improvement project

BACKGROUND: Clinical documentation improvement (CDI) is an increasing part of health system quality and patient care with clinical documentation integrity specialists (CDIS) expanding into daily physician workflow. This integration can be especially challenging for resident teams due to increased te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rouse, Michael, Jones, Matthew, Zogleman, Brice, May, Rebekah, Ekilah, Tanya, Gibson, Cheryl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001300
_version_ 1784734020202921984
author Rouse, Michael
Jones, Matthew
Zogleman, Brice
May, Rebekah
Ekilah, Tanya
Gibson, Cheryl
author_facet Rouse, Michael
Jones, Matthew
Zogleman, Brice
May, Rebekah
Ekilah, Tanya
Gibson, Cheryl
author_sort Rouse, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical documentation improvement (CDI) is an increasing part of health system quality and patient care with clinical documentation integrity specialists (CDIS) expanding into daily physician workflow. This integration can be especially challenging for resident teams due to increased team size, lack of documentation experience, and misunderstanding of both CDIS and CDI purpose. PROBLEM: The University of Kansas Health System Internal Medicine residency programme reported challenges with CDIS and resident workflow integration specifically in navigating and understanding CDIS documentation queries, CDIS interruption of interdisciplinary huddles, and general misunderstanding of CDI and the role of CDIS. METHODS: A quality improvement project was undertaken to integrate CDIS more effectively into resident workflow. Combined with a resident debrief session to identify general areas of concern, surveys were administered to internal medicine residents, resident rounding faculty and CDIS team members to identify specific barriers to CDIS–physician integration. INTERVENTION: A collective group of CDIS member teams, internal medicine chief residents and faculty physicians was formed. Changes made to the CDI process based on survey feedback included (1) improving formatting of CDIS electronic query templates, (2) standardisation of timing for CDIS verbal queries during interdisciplinary huddles, and (3) development of a resident didactic session focused on the role of CDIS and documentation’s impact on quality, safety and outcomes as related to the hospital, provider and patient. RESULTS: Surveys completed after implementation showed a positive impact on electronic query template changes and perception of CDIS at interdisciplinary huddles. The didactic curriculum was effective in helping residents understand the role and limitations of CDIS and how documentation affects quality of care. CONCLUSION: CDIS–physician integration into resident teams can occur through a collaborative focus on specific aspects of physician workflow and improving understanding of the impact of CDI on patient safety and quality of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9226871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92268712022-07-08 Resident integration with inpatient clinical documentation improvement: a quality improvement project Rouse, Michael Jones, Matthew Zogleman, Brice May, Rebekah Ekilah, Tanya Gibson, Cheryl BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report BACKGROUND: Clinical documentation improvement (CDI) is an increasing part of health system quality and patient care with clinical documentation integrity specialists (CDIS) expanding into daily physician workflow. This integration can be especially challenging for resident teams due to increased team size, lack of documentation experience, and misunderstanding of both CDIS and CDI purpose. PROBLEM: The University of Kansas Health System Internal Medicine residency programme reported challenges with CDIS and resident workflow integration specifically in navigating and understanding CDIS documentation queries, CDIS interruption of interdisciplinary huddles, and general misunderstanding of CDI and the role of CDIS. METHODS: A quality improvement project was undertaken to integrate CDIS more effectively into resident workflow. Combined with a resident debrief session to identify general areas of concern, surveys were administered to internal medicine residents, resident rounding faculty and CDIS team members to identify specific barriers to CDIS–physician integration. INTERVENTION: A collective group of CDIS member teams, internal medicine chief residents and faculty physicians was formed. Changes made to the CDI process based on survey feedback included (1) improving formatting of CDIS electronic query templates, (2) standardisation of timing for CDIS verbal queries during interdisciplinary huddles, and (3) development of a resident didactic session focused on the role of CDIS and documentation’s impact on quality, safety and outcomes as related to the hospital, provider and patient. RESULTS: Surveys completed after implementation showed a positive impact on electronic query template changes and perception of CDIS at interdisciplinary huddles. The didactic curriculum was effective in helping residents understand the role and limitations of CDIS and how documentation affects quality of care. CONCLUSION: CDIS–physician integration into resident teams can occur through a collaborative focus on specific aspects of physician workflow and improving understanding of the impact of CDI on patient safety and quality of care. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9226871/ /pubmed/35732406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001300 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Rouse, Michael
Jones, Matthew
Zogleman, Brice
May, Rebekah
Ekilah, Tanya
Gibson, Cheryl
Resident integration with inpatient clinical documentation improvement: a quality improvement project
title Resident integration with inpatient clinical documentation improvement: a quality improvement project
title_full Resident integration with inpatient clinical documentation improvement: a quality improvement project
title_fullStr Resident integration with inpatient clinical documentation improvement: a quality improvement project
title_full_unstemmed Resident integration with inpatient clinical documentation improvement: a quality improvement project
title_short Resident integration with inpatient clinical documentation improvement: a quality improvement project
title_sort resident integration with inpatient clinical documentation improvement: a quality improvement project
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001300
work_keys_str_mv AT rousemichael residentintegrationwithinpatientclinicaldocumentationimprovementaqualityimprovementproject
AT jonesmatthew residentintegrationwithinpatientclinicaldocumentationimprovementaqualityimprovementproject
AT zoglemanbrice residentintegrationwithinpatientclinicaldocumentationimprovementaqualityimprovementproject
AT mayrebekah residentintegrationwithinpatientclinicaldocumentationimprovementaqualityimprovementproject
AT ekilahtanya residentintegrationwithinpatientclinicaldocumentationimprovementaqualityimprovementproject
AT gibsoncheryl residentintegrationwithinpatientclinicaldocumentationimprovementaqualityimprovementproject