Cargando…

Relationship between serum lipid level and colorectal cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Investigative studies report contradictory results of the relationship between serum lipid levels and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We conducted a meta-analysis of prospective published studies to clarify the relationship between serum lipid and CRC risk. DESIGN: Systematic review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Zhenpeng, Tang, Huazhen, Lu, Shuai, Sun, Xibo, Rao, Benqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052373
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Investigative studies report contradictory results of the relationship between serum lipid levels and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We conducted a meta-analysis of prospective published studies to clarify the relationship between serum lipid and CRC risk. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Embase from inception until December 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We considered prospective cohort and case–control studies that evaluated differences in serum lipid levels with the risk of developing CRC. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers screened and included the studies using standardised electronic data extraction forms. The relative risks of the studies were combined with random-effect and fixed-effect models and were analysed for heterogeneity, publication bias and sensitivity. RESULTS: Twenty-four prospective studies, including 4 224 317 individuals with 29 499 CRC cases, were included in the meta-analysis. The total pooled risk ratio (RR) for high vs low concentrations of triglyceride (TG) concentrations was reported at 1.21 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.34; I(2)=46.8%), total cholesterol (TC) was at 1.15 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.22; I(2)=36.8%), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was 0.86 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.97; I(2)=28.8%) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was observed at 1.03 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.41; I(2)=69.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that high levels of serum TG and TC are positively correlated with the incidence rate of CRC, while high levels of serum HDL-C are negatively correlated with CRC incidence rate. Furthermore, no association was found between LDL-C and the risk of developing CRC. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity brought about by comparative methods, demographic differences and pathological differences between the research subjects limits the effectiveness of the overall pooled results.