Cargando…

Personalised Lung Cancer Screening (PLuS) study to assess the importance of coexisting chronic conditions to clinical practice and policy: protocol for a multicentre observational study

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the USA and worldwide, and lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT (LDCT) has the potential to improve lung cancer outcomes. A critical question is whether the ratio of potential benefits to harms found in prior LCS trials applie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Braithwaite, Dejana, Karanth, Shama D, Slatore, Christopher G, Zhang, Dongyu, Bian, Jiang, Meza, Rafael, Jeon, Jihyoun, Tammemagi, Martin, Schabath, Mattthew, Wheeler, Meghann, Guo, Yi, Hochhegger, Bruno, Kaye, Frederic J, Silvestri, Gerard A, Gould, Michael K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064142
_version_ 1784734040130060288
author Braithwaite, Dejana
Karanth, Shama D
Slatore, Christopher G
Zhang, Dongyu
Bian, Jiang
Meza, Rafael
Jeon, Jihyoun
Tammemagi, Martin
Schabath, Mattthew
Wheeler, Meghann
Guo, Yi
Hochhegger, Bruno
Kaye, Frederic J
Silvestri, Gerard A
Gould, Michael K
author_facet Braithwaite, Dejana
Karanth, Shama D
Slatore, Christopher G
Zhang, Dongyu
Bian, Jiang
Meza, Rafael
Jeon, Jihyoun
Tammemagi, Martin
Schabath, Mattthew
Wheeler, Meghann
Guo, Yi
Hochhegger, Bruno
Kaye, Frederic J
Silvestri, Gerard A
Gould, Michael K
author_sort Braithwaite, Dejana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the USA and worldwide, and lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT (LDCT) has the potential to improve lung cancer outcomes. A critical question is whether the ratio of potential benefits to harms found in prior LCS trials applies to an older and potentially sicker population. The Personalised Lung Cancer Screening (PLuS) study will help close this knowledge gap by leveraging real-world data to fully characterise LCS recipients. The principal goal of the PLuS study is to characterise the comorbidity burden of individuals undergoing LCS and quantify the benefits and harms of LCS to enable informed decision-making. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PLuS is a multicentre observational study designed to assemble an LCS cohort from the electronic health records of ~40 000 individuals undergoing annual LCS with LDCT from 2016 to 2022. Data will be integrated into a unified repository to (1) examine the burden of multimorbidity by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and age; (2) quantify potential benefits and harms; and (3) use the observational data with validated simulation models in the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) to provide LCS outcomes in the real-world US population. We will fit a multivariable logistic regression model to estimate the adjusted ORs of comorbidity, functional limitations and impaired pulmonary function adjusted for relevant covariates. We will also estimate the cumulative risk of LCS outcomes using discrete-time survival models. To our knowledge, this is the first study to combine observational data and simulation models to estimate the long-term impact of LCS with LDCT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Institutional Review Board and VA Portland Health Care System. The results will be disseminated through publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Safety considerations include protection of patient confidentiality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9226937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92269372022-07-08 Personalised Lung Cancer Screening (PLuS) study to assess the importance of coexisting chronic conditions to clinical practice and policy: protocol for a multicentre observational study Braithwaite, Dejana Karanth, Shama D Slatore, Christopher G Zhang, Dongyu Bian, Jiang Meza, Rafael Jeon, Jihyoun Tammemagi, Martin Schabath, Mattthew Wheeler, Meghann Guo, Yi Hochhegger, Bruno Kaye, Frederic J Silvestri, Gerard A Gould, Michael K BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the USA and worldwide, and lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT (LDCT) has the potential to improve lung cancer outcomes. A critical question is whether the ratio of potential benefits to harms found in prior LCS trials applies to an older and potentially sicker population. The Personalised Lung Cancer Screening (PLuS) study will help close this knowledge gap by leveraging real-world data to fully characterise LCS recipients. The principal goal of the PLuS study is to characterise the comorbidity burden of individuals undergoing LCS and quantify the benefits and harms of LCS to enable informed decision-making. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PLuS is a multicentre observational study designed to assemble an LCS cohort from the electronic health records of ~40 000 individuals undergoing annual LCS with LDCT from 2016 to 2022. Data will be integrated into a unified repository to (1) examine the burden of multimorbidity by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and age; (2) quantify potential benefits and harms; and (3) use the observational data with validated simulation models in the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) to provide LCS outcomes in the real-world US population. We will fit a multivariable logistic regression model to estimate the adjusted ORs of comorbidity, functional limitations and impaired pulmonary function adjusted for relevant covariates. We will also estimate the cumulative risk of LCS outcomes using discrete-time survival models. To our knowledge, this is the first study to combine observational data and simulation models to estimate the long-term impact of LCS with LDCT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Institutional Review Board and VA Portland Health Care System. The results will be disseminated through publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Safety considerations include protection of patient confidentiality. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9226937/ /pubmed/35732383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064142 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Oncology
Braithwaite, Dejana
Karanth, Shama D
Slatore, Christopher G
Zhang, Dongyu
Bian, Jiang
Meza, Rafael
Jeon, Jihyoun
Tammemagi, Martin
Schabath, Mattthew
Wheeler, Meghann
Guo, Yi
Hochhegger, Bruno
Kaye, Frederic J
Silvestri, Gerard A
Gould, Michael K
Personalised Lung Cancer Screening (PLuS) study to assess the importance of coexisting chronic conditions to clinical practice and policy: protocol for a multicentre observational study
title Personalised Lung Cancer Screening (PLuS) study to assess the importance of coexisting chronic conditions to clinical practice and policy: protocol for a multicentre observational study
title_full Personalised Lung Cancer Screening (PLuS) study to assess the importance of coexisting chronic conditions to clinical practice and policy: protocol for a multicentre observational study
title_fullStr Personalised Lung Cancer Screening (PLuS) study to assess the importance of coexisting chronic conditions to clinical practice and policy: protocol for a multicentre observational study
title_full_unstemmed Personalised Lung Cancer Screening (PLuS) study to assess the importance of coexisting chronic conditions to clinical practice and policy: protocol for a multicentre observational study
title_short Personalised Lung Cancer Screening (PLuS) study to assess the importance of coexisting chronic conditions to clinical practice and policy: protocol for a multicentre observational study
title_sort personalised lung cancer screening (plus) study to assess the importance of coexisting chronic conditions to clinical practice and policy: protocol for a multicentre observational study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064142
work_keys_str_mv AT braithwaitedejana personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT karanthshamad personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT slatorechristopherg personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT zhangdongyu personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT bianjiang personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT mezarafael personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT jeonjihyoun personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT tammemagimartin personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT schabathmattthew personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT wheelermeghann personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT guoyi personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT hochheggerbruno personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT kayefredericj personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT silvestrigerarda personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT gouldmichaelk personalisedlungcancerscreeningplusstudytoassesstheimportanceofcoexistingchronicconditionstoclinicalpracticeandpolicyprotocolforamulticentreobservationalstudy