Cargando…
Wie stark hat die COVID-19-Pandemie die kardiologische Rehabilitation im ersten Jahr der Pandemie beeinflusst? Ein Vergleich der Leistungszahlen aus 2019 mit 2020 in Deutschland
INTRODUCTION: In Germany, the COVID-19 pandemic led to substantial changes in outpatient and acute clinical cardiac care and rehabilitation. To estimate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rehabilitation in 2020, institutional performance was compared to the pre-pandemic year 2019. MET...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier GmbH.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35760747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2022.05.007 |
_version_ | 1784734045052076032 |
---|---|
author | Bestehorn, Kurt Schwaab, Bernhard Schlitt, Axel |
author_facet | Bestehorn, Kurt Schwaab, Bernhard Schlitt, Axel |
author_sort | Bestehorn, Kurt |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In Germany, the COVID-19 pandemic led to substantial changes in outpatient and acute clinical cardiac care and rehabilitation. To estimate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rehabilitation in 2020, institutional performance was compared to the pre-pandemic year 2019. METHODS: The performance numbers from rehabilitation institutions were compared. These data were provided in 2019 and 2020 as part of an online survey that the German Society for the Prevention and Rehabilitation of Cardiovascular Diseases (DGPR) performs annually. RESULTS: Complete data for 2019 and 2020 were available from 60 institutions. The overall number of patients treated was reduced by 14.3%, with substantial differences between institutions. Women were more affected (–16.4%) than men (–13.4%) and retirees (–14.5%) significantly more than people still in the workforce (–7.5%). In 25 institutions (42.4%) there was a COVID-19 outbreak resulting in a partial or complete shutdown in 15.7%. In total, 34.5% of the institutions treated patients with COVID-19 infection, 30.5% after such an infection. A large majority of these institutions (72.1%) had to bear the costs for testing suspected cases of SARS-CoV-2-infection alone. CONCLUSION: The economic and logistic burden of the COVID-19 pandemic has posed a threat to cardiac rehabilitation in Germany. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9226969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier GmbH. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92269692022-06-24 Wie stark hat die COVID-19-Pandemie die kardiologische Rehabilitation im ersten Jahr der Pandemie beeinflusst? Ein Vergleich der Leistungszahlen aus 2019 mit 2020 in Deutschland Bestehorn, Kurt Schwaab, Bernhard Schlitt, Axel Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes Qualität und Sicherheit in der Gesundheitsversorgung / Quality and Safety in Health Care INTRODUCTION: In Germany, the COVID-19 pandemic led to substantial changes in outpatient and acute clinical cardiac care and rehabilitation. To estimate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rehabilitation in 2020, institutional performance was compared to the pre-pandemic year 2019. METHODS: The performance numbers from rehabilitation institutions were compared. These data were provided in 2019 and 2020 as part of an online survey that the German Society for the Prevention and Rehabilitation of Cardiovascular Diseases (DGPR) performs annually. RESULTS: Complete data for 2019 and 2020 were available from 60 institutions. The overall number of patients treated was reduced by 14.3%, with substantial differences between institutions. Women were more affected (–16.4%) than men (–13.4%) and retirees (–14.5%) significantly more than people still in the workforce (–7.5%). In 25 institutions (42.4%) there was a COVID-19 outbreak resulting in a partial or complete shutdown in 15.7%. In total, 34.5% of the institutions treated patients with COVID-19 infection, 30.5% after such an infection. A large majority of these institutions (72.1%) had to bear the costs for testing suspected cases of SARS-CoV-2-infection alone. CONCLUSION: The economic and logistic burden of the COVID-19 pandemic has posed a threat to cardiac rehabilitation in Germany. Published by Elsevier GmbH. 2022-09 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9226969/ /pubmed/35760747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2022.05.007 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier GmbH. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Qualität und Sicherheit in der Gesundheitsversorgung / Quality and Safety in Health Care Bestehorn, Kurt Schwaab, Bernhard Schlitt, Axel Wie stark hat die COVID-19-Pandemie die kardiologische Rehabilitation im ersten Jahr der Pandemie beeinflusst? Ein Vergleich der Leistungszahlen aus 2019 mit 2020 in Deutschland |
title | Wie stark hat die COVID-19-Pandemie die kardiologische Rehabilitation im ersten Jahr der Pandemie beeinflusst? Ein Vergleich der Leistungszahlen aus 2019 mit 2020 in Deutschland |
title_full | Wie stark hat die COVID-19-Pandemie die kardiologische Rehabilitation im ersten Jahr der Pandemie beeinflusst? Ein Vergleich der Leistungszahlen aus 2019 mit 2020 in Deutschland |
title_fullStr | Wie stark hat die COVID-19-Pandemie die kardiologische Rehabilitation im ersten Jahr der Pandemie beeinflusst? Ein Vergleich der Leistungszahlen aus 2019 mit 2020 in Deutschland |
title_full_unstemmed | Wie stark hat die COVID-19-Pandemie die kardiologische Rehabilitation im ersten Jahr der Pandemie beeinflusst? Ein Vergleich der Leistungszahlen aus 2019 mit 2020 in Deutschland |
title_short | Wie stark hat die COVID-19-Pandemie die kardiologische Rehabilitation im ersten Jahr der Pandemie beeinflusst? Ein Vergleich der Leistungszahlen aus 2019 mit 2020 in Deutschland |
title_sort | wie stark hat die covid-19-pandemie die kardiologische rehabilitation im ersten jahr der pandemie beeinflusst? ein vergleich der leistungszahlen aus 2019 mit 2020 in deutschland |
topic | Qualität und Sicherheit in der Gesundheitsversorgung / Quality and Safety in Health Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9226969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35760747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2022.05.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bestehornkurt wiestarkhatdiecovid19pandemiediekardiologischerehabilitationimerstenjahrderpandemiebeeinflussteinvergleichderleistungszahlenaus2019mit2020indeutschland AT schwaabbernhard wiestarkhatdiecovid19pandemiediekardiologischerehabilitationimerstenjahrderpandemiebeeinflussteinvergleichderleistungszahlenaus2019mit2020indeutschland AT schlittaxel wiestarkhatdiecovid19pandemiediekardiologischerehabilitationimerstenjahrderpandemiebeeinflussteinvergleichderleistungszahlenaus2019mit2020indeutschland |