Cargando…

Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16

The convolutional neural network (CNN) has become a powerful tool in machine learning (ML) that is used to solve complex problems such as image recognition, natural language processing, and video analysis. Notably, the idea of exploring convolutional neural network architecture has gained substantia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naseer, Iftikhar, Akram, Sheeraz, Masood, Tehreem, Jaffar, Arfan, Khan, Muhammad Adnan, Mosavi, Amir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9227226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35746208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22124426
_version_ 1784734114464661504
author Naseer, Iftikhar
Akram, Sheeraz
Masood, Tehreem
Jaffar, Arfan
Khan, Muhammad Adnan
Mosavi, Amir
author_facet Naseer, Iftikhar
Akram, Sheeraz
Masood, Tehreem
Jaffar, Arfan
Khan, Muhammad Adnan
Mosavi, Amir
author_sort Naseer, Iftikhar
collection PubMed
description The convolutional neural network (CNN) has become a powerful tool in machine learning (ML) that is used to solve complex problems such as image recognition, natural language processing, and video analysis. Notably, the idea of exploring convolutional neural network architecture has gained substantial attention as well as popularity. This study focuses on the intrinsic various CNN architectures: LeNet, AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet-50, and Inception-V1, which have been scrutinized and compared with each other for the detection of lung cancer using publicly available LUNA16 datasets. Furthermore, multiple performance optimizers: root mean square propagation (RMSProp), adaptive moment estimation (Adam), and stochastic gradient descent (SGD), were applied for this comparative study. The performances of the three CNN architectures were measured for accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, false omission rate, negative predictive value, and F1 score. The experimental results showed that the CNN AlexNet architecture with the SGD optimizer achieved the highest validation accuracy for CT lung cancer with an accuracy of 97.42%, misclassification rate of 2.58%, 97.58% sensitivity, 97.25% specificity, 97.58% positive predictive value, 97.25% negative predictive value, false omission rate of 2.75%, and F1 score of 97.58%. AlexNet with the SGD optimizer was the best and outperformed compared to the other state-of-the-art CNN architectures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9227226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92272262022-06-25 Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16 Naseer, Iftikhar Akram, Sheeraz Masood, Tehreem Jaffar, Arfan Khan, Muhammad Adnan Mosavi, Amir Sensors (Basel) Article The convolutional neural network (CNN) has become a powerful tool in machine learning (ML) that is used to solve complex problems such as image recognition, natural language processing, and video analysis. Notably, the idea of exploring convolutional neural network architecture has gained substantial attention as well as popularity. This study focuses on the intrinsic various CNN architectures: LeNet, AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet-50, and Inception-V1, which have been scrutinized and compared with each other for the detection of lung cancer using publicly available LUNA16 datasets. Furthermore, multiple performance optimizers: root mean square propagation (RMSProp), adaptive moment estimation (Adam), and stochastic gradient descent (SGD), were applied for this comparative study. The performances of the three CNN architectures were measured for accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, false omission rate, negative predictive value, and F1 score. The experimental results showed that the CNN AlexNet architecture with the SGD optimizer achieved the highest validation accuracy for CT lung cancer with an accuracy of 97.42%, misclassification rate of 2.58%, 97.58% sensitivity, 97.25% specificity, 97.58% positive predictive value, 97.25% negative predictive value, false omission rate of 2.75%, and F1 score of 97.58%. AlexNet with the SGD optimizer was the best and outperformed compared to the other state-of-the-art CNN architectures. MDPI 2022-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9227226/ /pubmed/35746208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22124426 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Naseer, Iftikhar
Akram, Sheeraz
Masood, Tehreem
Jaffar, Arfan
Khan, Muhammad Adnan
Mosavi, Amir
Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16
title Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16
title_full Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16
title_fullStr Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16
title_full_unstemmed Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16
title_short Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16
title_sort performance analysis of state-of-the-art cnn architectures for luna16
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9227226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35746208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22124426
work_keys_str_mv AT naseeriftikhar performanceanalysisofstateoftheartcnnarchitecturesforluna16
AT akramsheeraz performanceanalysisofstateoftheartcnnarchitecturesforluna16
AT masoodtehreem performanceanalysisofstateoftheartcnnarchitecturesforluna16
AT jaffararfan performanceanalysisofstateoftheartcnnarchitecturesforluna16
AT khanmuhammadadnan performanceanalysisofstateoftheartcnnarchitecturesforluna16
AT mosaviamir performanceanalysisofstateoftheartcnnarchitecturesforluna16