Cargando…
Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16
The convolutional neural network (CNN) has become a powerful tool in machine learning (ML) that is used to solve complex problems such as image recognition, natural language processing, and video analysis. Notably, the idea of exploring convolutional neural network architecture has gained substantia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9227226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35746208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22124426 |
_version_ | 1784734114464661504 |
---|---|
author | Naseer, Iftikhar Akram, Sheeraz Masood, Tehreem Jaffar, Arfan Khan, Muhammad Adnan Mosavi, Amir |
author_facet | Naseer, Iftikhar Akram, Sheeraz Masood, Tehreem Jaffar, Arfan Khan, Muhammad Adnan Mosavi, Amir |
author_sort | Naseer, Iftikhar |
collection | PubMed |
description | The convolutional neural network (CNN) has become a powerful tool in machine learning (ML) that is used to solve complex problems such as image recognition, natural language processing, and video analysis. Notably, the idea of exploring convolutional neural network architecture has gained substantial attention as well as popularity. This study focuses on the intrinsic various CNN architectures: LeNet, AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet-50, and Inception-V1, which have been scrutinized and compared with each other for the detection of lung cancer using publicly available LUNA16 datasets. Furthermore, multiple performance optimizers: root mean square propagation (RMSProp), adaptive moment estimation (Adam), and stochastic gradient descent (SGD), were applied for this comparative study. The performances of the three CNN architectures were measured for accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, false omission rate, negative predictive value, and F1 score. The experimental results showed that the CNN AlexNet architecture with the SGD optimizer achieved the highest validation accuracy for CT lung cancer with an accuracy of 97.42%, misclassification rate of 2.58%, 97.58% sensitivity, 97.25% specificity, 97.58% positive predictive value, 97.25% negative predictive value, false omission rate of 2.75%, and F1 score of 97.58%. AlexNet with the SGD optimizer was the best and outperformed compared to the other state-of-the-art CNN architectures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9227226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92272262022-06-25 Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16 Naseer, Iftikhar Akram, Sheeraz Masood, Tehreem Jaffar, Arfan Khan, Muhammad Adnan Mosavi, Amir Sensors (Basel) Article The convolutional neural network (CNN) has become a powerful tool in machine learning (ML) that is used to solve complex problems such as image recognition, natural language processing, and video analysis. Notably, the idea of exploring convolutional neural network architecture has gained substantial attention as well as popularity. This study focuses on the intrinsic various CNN architectures: LeNet, AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet-50, and Inception-V1, which have been scrutinized and compared with each other for the detection of lung cancer using publicly available LUNA16 datasets. Furthermore, multiple performance optimizers: root mean square propagation (RMSProp), adaptive moment estimation (Adam), and stochastic gradient descent (SGD), were applied for this comparative study. The performances of the three CNN architectures were measured for accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, false omission rate, negative predictive value, and F1 score. The experimental results showed that the CNN AlexNet architecture with the SGD optimizer achieved the highest validation accuracy for CT lung cancer with an accuracy of 97.42%, misclassification rate of 2.58%, 97.58% sensitivity, 97.25% specificity, 97.58% positive predictive value, 97.25% negative predictive value, false omission rate of 2.75%, and F1 score of 97.58%. AlexNet with the SGD optimizer was the best and outperformed compared to the other state-of-the-art CNN architectures. MDPI 2022-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9227226/ /pubmed/35746208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22124426 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Naseer, Iftikhar Akram, Sheeraz Masood, Tehreem Jaffar, Arfan Khan, Muhammad Adnan Mosavi, Amir Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16 |
title | Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16 |
title_full | Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16 |
title_fullStr | Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16 |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16 |
title_short | Performance Analysis of State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures for LUNA16 |
title_sort | performance analysis of state-of-the-art cnn architectures for luna16 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9227226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35746208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22124426 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naseeriftikhar performanceanalysisofstateoftheartcnnarchitecturesforluna16 AT akramsheeraz performanceanalysisofstateoftheartcnnarchitecturesforluna16 AT masoodtehreem performanceanalysisofstateoftheartcnnarchitecturesforluna16 AT jaffararfan performanceanalysisofstateoftheartcnnarchitecturesforluna16 AT khanmuhammadadnan performanceanalysisofstateoftheartcnnarchitecturesforluna16 AT mosaviamir performanceanalysisofstateoftheartcnnarchitecturesforluna16 |