Cargando…

Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review

Background and Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal tumors, with a 5-year overall survival rate of less than 10%. To date, curative surgical resection remains the only favorable option for improving patients’ survival. However, there is no consensus on w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gulla, Aiste, Hashimoto, Daisuke, Wagner, Doris, Damaseviciute, Ryte, Strupas, Kestutis, Satoi, Sohei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9227260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060756
_version_ 1784734126176206848
author Gulla, Aiste
Hashimoto, Daisuke
Wagner, Doris
Damaseviciute, Ryte
Strupas, Kestutis
Satoi, Sohei
author_facet Gulla, Aiste
Hashimoto, Daisuke
Wagner, Doris
Damaseviciute, Ryte
Strupas, Kestutis
Satoi, Sohei
author_sort Gulla, Aiste
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal tumors, with a 5-year overall survival rate of less than 10%. To date, curative surgical resection remains the only favorable option for improving patients’ survival. However, there is no consensus on which prognostic biochemical, radiological markers or neoadjuvant therapy regimens would benefit patients the most. Materials and Methods: A literature review was performed focusing on overall survival, R0 resection, 30-day mortality, adverse events (AEs), and elevated biomarkers. The electronic databases were searched from 2015 to 2020. Results: We reviewed 22 independent studies. In total, 20 studies were retrospective single- or multi-center reviews, while 2 studies were prospective Phase II trials. Conclusions: Patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC, who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgery, have significantly better survival rates. The CA 19-9 biomarker levels in the neoadjuvant setting should be evaluated and considered as a specific biomarker for tumor resectability and overall survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9227260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92272602022-06-25 Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review Gulla, Aiste Hashimoto, Daisuke Wagner, Doris Damaseviciute, Ryte Strupas, Kestutis Satoi, Sohei Medicina (Kaunas) Review Background and Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal tumors, with a 5-year overall survival rate of less than 10%. To date, curative surgical resection remains the only favorable option for improving patients’ survival. However, there is no consensus on which prognostic biochemical, radiological markers or neoadjuvant therapy regimens would benefit patients the most. Materials and Methods: A literature review was performed focusing on overall survival, R0 resection, 30-day mortality, adverse events (AEs), and elevated biomarkers. The electronic databases were searched from 2015 to 2020. Results: We reviewed 22 independent studies. In total, 20 studies were retrospective single- or multi-center reviews, while 2 studies were prospective Phase II trials. Conclusions: Patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC, who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgery, have significantly better survival rates. The CA 19-9 biomarker levels in the neoadjuvant setting should be evaluated and considered as a specific biomarker for tumor resectability and overall survival. MDPI 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9227260/ /pubmed/35744019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060756 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Gulla, Aiste
Hashimoto, Daisuke
Wagner, Doris
Damaseviciute, Ryte
Strupas, Kestutis
Satoi, Sohei
Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review
title Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review
title_full Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review
title_fullStr Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review
title_short Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review
title_sort interdisciplinary approach of establishing pdac resectability: biochemical, radiological and nat regimen prognostic factors—literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9227260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060756
work_keys_str_mv AT gullaaiste interdisciplinaryapproachofestablishingpdacresectabilitybiochemicalradiologicalandnatregimenprognosticfactorsliteraturereview
AT hashimotodaisuke interdisciplinaryapproachofestablishingpdacresectabilitybiochemicalradiologicalandnatregimenprognosticfactorsliteraturereview
AT wagnerdoris interdisciplinaryapproachofestablishingpdacresectabilitybiochemicalradiologicalandnatregimenprognosticfactorsliteraturereview
AT damaseviciuteryte interdisciplinaryapproachofestablishingpdacresectabilitybiochemicalradiologicalandnatregimenprognosticfactorsliteraturereview
AT strupaskestutis interdisciplinaryapproachofestablishingpdacresectabilitybiochemicalradiologicalandnatregimenprognosticfactorsliteraturereview
AT satoisohei interdisciplinaryapproachofestablishingpdacresectabilitybiochemicalradiologicalandnatregimenprognosticfactorsliteraturereview