Cargando…
Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review
Background and Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal tumors, with a 5-year overall survival rate of less than 10%. To date, curative surgical resection remains the only favorable option for improving patients’ survival. However, there is no consensus on w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9227260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060756 |
_version_ | 1784734126176206848 |
---|---|
author | Gulla, Aiste Hashimoto, Daisuke Wagner, Doris Damaseviciute, Ryte Strupas, Kestutis Satoi, Sohei |
author_facet | Gulla, Aiste Hashimoto, Daisuke Wagner, Doris Damaseviciute, Ryte Strupas, Kestutis Satoi, Sohei |
author_sort | Gulla, Aiste |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal tumors, with a 5-year overall survival rate of less than 10%. To date, curative surgical resection remains the only favorable option for improving patients’ survival. However, there is no consensus on which prognostic biochemical, radiological markers or neoadjuvant therapy regimens would benefit patients the most. Materials and Methods: A literature review was performed focusing on overall survival, R0 resection, 30-day mortality, adverse events (AEs), and elevated biomarkers. The electronic databases were searched from 2015 to 2020. Results: We reviewed 22 independent studies. In total, 20 studies were retrospective single- or multi-center reviews, while 2 studies were prospective Phase II trials. Conclusions: Patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC, who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgery, have significantly better survival rates. The CA 19-9 biomarker levels in the neoadjuvant setting should be evaluated and considered as a specific biomarker for tumor resectability and overall survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9227260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92272602022-06-25 Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review Gulla, Aiste Hashimoto, Daisuke Wagner, Doris Damaseviciute, Ryte Strupas, Kestutis Satoi, Sohei Medicina (Kaunas) Review Background and Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal tumors, with a 5-year overall survival rate of less than 10%. To date, curative surgical resection remains the only favorable option for improving patients’ survival. However, there is no consensus on which prognostic biochemical, radiological markers or neoadjuvant therapy regimens would benefit patients the most. Materials and Methods: A literature review was performed focusing on overall survival, R0 resection, 30-day mortality, adverse events (AEs), and elevated biomarkers. The electronic databases were searched from 2015 to 2020. Results: We reviewed 22 independent studies. In total, 20 studies were retrospective single- or multi-center reviews, while 2 studies were prospective Phase II trials. Conclusions: Patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC, who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgery, have significantly better survival rates. The CA 19-9 biomarker levels in the neoadjuvant setting should be evaluated and considered as a specific biomarker for tumor resectability and overall survival. MDPI 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9227260/ /pubmed/35744019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060756 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Gulla, Aiste Hashimoto, Daisuke Wagner, Doris Damaseviciute, Ryte Strupas, Kestutis Satoi, Sohei Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review |
title | Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review |
title_full | Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review |
title_short | Interdisciplinary Approach of Establishing PDAC Resectability: Biochemical, Radiological and NAT Regimen Prognostic Factors—Literature Review |
title_sort | interdisciplinary approach of establishing pdac resectability: biochemical, radiological and nat regimen prognostic factors—literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9227260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35744019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060756 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gullaaiste interdisciplinaryapproachofestablishingpdacresectabilitybiochemicalradiologicalandnatregimenprognosticfactorsliteraturereview AT hashimotodaisuke interdisciplinaryapproachofestablishingpdacresectabilitybiochemicalradiologicalandnatregimenprognosticfactorsliteraturereview AT wagnerdoris interdisciplinaryapproachofestablishingpdacresectabilitybiochemicalradiologicalandnatregimenprognosticfactorsliteraturereview AT damaseviciuteryte interdisciplinaryapproachofestablishingpdacresectabilitybiochemicalradiologicalandnatregimenprognosticfactorsliteraturereview AT strupaskestutis interdisciplinaryapproachofestablishingpdacresectabilitybiochemicalradiologicalandnatregimenprognosticfactorsliteraturereview AT satoisohei interdisciplinaryapproachofestablishingpdacresectabilitybiochemicalradiologicalandnatregimenprognosticfactorsliteraturereview |